The Effectiveness of a Creative Arts en Psychomotor Therapy Intervention for People With Personality Disorders. From Negative Thinking to Positive Doing. (NDPD)

March 13, 2024 updated by: Suzanne Haeyen

The Effectiveness of a Creative Arts en Psychomotor Therapy Intervention for People With Personality Disorders to Enhance Psychological Adaptation and Wellbeing, a Multiple Baseline Single Case Experimental Design.

Mental health consists of the absence of mental disorders and the presence of mental well-being. However; mental health care currently focuses mainly on mental disorders and less on promoting mental well-being. And yet people with personality problems often score very low on well-being. In order to work on sustainable mental health, attention is needed for both mental complaints and well-being and this is achieved through promoting psychological adaptation.

Psychological adaptation is the process in which a person deals in a healthy way with their own needs, emotions and inner signals (such as stress) as well as the smaller or larger challenges in life. For people with personality problems psychological adaptation is also low, they mainly react in rigid patterns.

Creative arts and psychomotor therapies (CAPTS) are a non-verbal form of therapy in which various creative methods, such as theater, sports, dance, music and sports methods, are used to make contact with emotions and to practice healthier ways of dealing with them. This is very suitable for working on promoting psychological adaptivity, within a safe and playful context. It's about doing and experiencing, and discovering what works for you personally, more than talking and understanding.

That this is effective is endorsed by professionals and clients in mental health care, but scientific evidence is still scarce. That is why a specially developed, CAPTS module for people with personality problems will be investigated in a mixed methods design. We focus on both effectiveness and working mechanisms in a Multiple Baseline Single Case Experimental Design and a qualitative approach.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Personality disorders are common psychiatric disorders. 5%-10% of all Dutch people have a personality disorder. The best-known personality disorders are borderline, narcissistic and avoidant personality disorders. Personality disorders often arise in adolescence. Deep-seated limitations in behavior, thoughts, feelings, connection and intimacy lead to long-term dysregulation in dealing with oneself and others. This causes problems in several areas of life that patients can no longer solve themselves, including difficulties in intimate relationships and incapacity for work. Specialist treatment can turn the tide.

Creative arts and psychomotor therapies (CAPTS) are often a permanent part of the treatment for personality disorders, in addition to psychotherapy and psychotropic drugs. The treatment tradition of the CAPTS spans approximately a century and includes the disciplines: art, drama, dance, music and psychomotor therapy. For professional therapists, the patients' request for help is the starting point. The treatments for the various personality disorders therefore often overlap. The CAPTS focus on experiencing and doing. Feelings, thoughts and behavioral patterns emerge through making art, play, music or physical sensation. Awareness and (self) reflection are stimulated and new roles and skills are practiced in a safe manner.

With CAPTS, patients with a personality disorder can develop more appropriate ways of relating to themselves and others. To date, little practice-oriented research has been conducted into the treatment of personality disorders with occupational therapy. However, the Dutch Healthcare Institute insists on substantiation of the effectiveness of the CAPTS to justify its reimbursement. There is also an increasing demand for this from the professional organizations of professional therapists and patient organizations.

Existing treatments for personality disorders are aimed at reducing complaints. However, mental health also consists of the presence of well-being. Well-being is about whether someone feels good psychologically, emotionally and socially. Even if patients have physical and psychological complaints. Patients with a personality disorder often have low well-being. Promoting well-being is an important step towards their recovery, which is an important treatment goal according to the treatment guideline. Working on better psychological adaptation is how this can be achieved, one will get more adaptive to their own emotional needs within the context of daily life. Wellbeing will be improved accordingly.

CAPTS professionals indicate that no specific treatment module with CAPTS interventions has yet been developed to promote the psychological adaptation and well-being of patients with a personality disorder. From a professional point of view, they feel the need for this, because that is precisely where their strength lies. Patient organizations confirm the importance of this from the patient perspective.

When developing and evaluating CAPTS interventions, it is therefore important to promote psychological adaptation and well-being of patients with a personality disorder, in addition to reducing complaints.

In summary, personality disorders are common and serious psychiatric disorders that impair psychological and social functioning. CAPTS treatment is promising for promoting psychological adaptation and well-being of patients with personality disorders. However, treatment specifically aimed at this is not yet available in practice. Practical research into the development and evaluation of CAPTS interventions meets an important and immediate need in the professional field and is in line with the treatment guidelines for personality disorders and various national research agendas. From a social perspective, the proper treatment of people with serious psychological suffering is an important issue.

Research Question:

How can the various CAPTS disciplines promote psychological adaptivity in patients with a personality disorder and what is the effect of this approach on complaint reduction and well-being?

Aim of this research:

Designing and testing a practical and broadly applicable module with CAPTS interventions and a practical manual that promote psychological adaptation and well-being of people with personality disorders.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

17

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • HAN University of Applied Sciences
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Suzanne Haeyen
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jackie Heijman
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hans Wouters
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Karin Timmerman
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Imke Wiersma

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having a personality disorder.
  • suitable for grouptherapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • excessive dissocation, Conversion disorder, excessive destructive and suicidal behavior.
  • present psychosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: A CAPTS intervention for people with personality disorders.
Experimental: Control Period - Intervention Period Multiple baseline single case experimental design wherein all patients are first assigned to the control condition (or control period) are then assigned to the intervention condition (or intervention period) and finally to the follow-up period (control period). Patients are randomized for the time (t) at which they start with the intervention.
a Group (max of 9 participants) Creative arts and psychomotor therapies (CAPTS) intervention for people with personality disorders. Consisting of 10 sessions, where two CAPTS disciplines and therapists are represented each session. Each session lasts 90 minutes. Sessions are aimed at psychological adativity thru=ough the CAPTS. The sessions cover warming up in one of the CAPTS, short psycho education and a longer assigment focusing on the session goal. The first half of the interventions focusses mainly on listening to body signals, emotions and emotional needs and dealing in a healthy way with these. The second half will be more complex when dealing with challenges and adapting tot he context in a healthy way are goals of the sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Generic sense of ability to adapt scale (GSAAS)
Time Frame: Up to 23 repeated measures, i.e. weekly over the course of 23 weeks (5-8 weeks control period + 10 weeks intervention + 5 weeks follow-up)
Assessment of the ability to adapt with 10 5-point scale items.
Up to 23 repeated measures, i.e. weekly over the course of 23 weeks (5-8 weeks control period + 10 weeks intervention + 5 weeks follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-expression and Emotion Regulation in Art Therapy Scale (SERATS)
Time Frame: Up to 23 repeated measures, i.e. weekly over the course of 23 weeks (5-8 weeks control period + 10 weeks intervention + 5 weeks follow-up)
Self-expression and Emotion Regulation in Art Therapy Scale (SERATS): Assessment of emotional self-expression and regulation during therapy with 9 5-point scale items
Up to 23 repeated measures, i.e. weekly over the course of 23 weeks (5-8 weeks control period + 10 weeks intervention + 5 weeks follow-up)
Schema Modes Questionnaire, Healthy adult and Happy Child Subscale. (SMI)
Time Frame: Up to 23 repeated measures, i.e. weekly over the course of 23 weeks (5-8 weeks control period + 10 weeks intervention + 5 weeks follow-up)
Assessment of adaptive schemamodes the Healthy adult and Happy Child, with 20 6-point scale items.
Up to 23 repeated measures, i.e. weekly over the course of 23 weeks (5-8 weeks control period + 10 weeks intervention + 5 weeks follow-up)
Schema Modes Questionnaire, maladaptive schemamodes. (SMI)
Time Frame: 2 repeated measures of the SMI the maladaptive modes, at the start of the control period and at the end of the follow up period, max. 23 weeks apart]
Assessment of maladaptive schemamodes, with 98 6-point scale items.
2 repeated measures of the SMI the maladaptive modes, at the start of the control period and at the end of the follow up period, max. 23 weeks apart]
Mental Health Continuum- short form (MHC-sf).
Time Frame: 2 repeated measures of the MHC-sf for Mental wellbeing, at the start of the control period and at the end of the follow up period, max. 23 weeks apart]
Assessment of Mental wellbeing, with 14 6-point scale items
2 repeated measures of the MHC-sf for Mental wellbeing, at the start of the control period and at the end of the follow up period, max. 23 weeks apart]
Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI).
Time Frame: 2 repeated measures of the BSI for, at the start of the control period and at the end of the follow up period, max. 23 weeks apart]
Assessment of sympoms of psychopathology, with 53 5-points scale items.
2 repeated measures of the BSI for, at the start of the control period and at the end of the follow up period, max. 23 weeks apart]

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interviews with the participants and therapists
Time Frame: Once 3 weeks after the intervention
Semi structured interviews about the experiences of the participants and the therapists with the intervention, qualitative data.
Once 3 weeks after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Christine de Vries, MSc, HAN University of Applied Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NDPD - SU1606

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We will make IPD available, but personal data wont be shared at all. Using a doi for the processed data giving a description of the meta-data and then data can be requested at the principal investigator.

investigator, to whom data requests can be sent.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication of the main paper until 10 years after this publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The principal investigator will investigate whether requests are reasonable and feasible and adhere to ethical considerations.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Personality Disorders

Clinical Trials on Creative arts and psychomotor therapies intervention for people with personality disorders

3
Subscribe