Corticosteroids in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Prospective Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Study

February 14, 2024 updated by: Jorge Guillermo Boretto, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Systemic Versus Local Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Prospective Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Study.

The goal of this prospective, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority analytical study is to compare the Boston score in patients treated with systemic (intramuscular) versus local infiltration corticosteroids in mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients over 18 years of age with mild or moderate carpal tunnel syndrome.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the effectiveness of intramuscular injection of corticosteroids compared to local infiltration in the treatment of mild/moderate carpal tunnel syndrome?
  • What are the adverse effects and application site pain associated with each route of administration?

Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be asked to participate in the study and sign an informed consent form.

The Redcap randomizer will be used to assign the patient to one of the branches.

Researchers will compare

  • Branch A: patients treated with local corticosteroid infiltration in carpal tunnel under ultrasound
  • Branch B: patients treated with intramuscular corticosteroid injection.

Researchers will:

  • Compare Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score at 1.5 months, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-procedure.
  • Describe adverse reactions associated with the route of administration.
  • Compare the pain at the site of application associated with the route of administration.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral compressive neuropathy of the upper limb, consisting of involvement of the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel. It has a prevalence of 7% to 16% in the United Kingdom adult population, while in the United States between 400/500 thousand patients are treated surgically, with an annual economic cost exceeding $2 billion.

A variety of treatments are available according to the stage of the pathology, including splinting, kinesic therapy, ultrasound, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic or local corticosteroids , as well as surgical treatment in patients who do not respond to previous options.

Corticosteroid infiltration is one of the most widely used methods for the treatment of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (ICTS) in mild and moderate stages, and short-term symptomatic improvement is reported in the literature, although the optimal dose and drug used for the same is varied in the various published studies, and is still a matter of debate in the literature. Betamethasone has greater anti-inflammatory power and a longer duration of action at the same equivalent dose than other corticosteroids used in the treatment of CTS (prednisolone, methylprednisolone, triamcinolone, cortisone).

In addition, ultrasound-guided local infiltration helps prevent iatrogenic injury compared to anatomical repair-guided infiltration. Studies show improvement in scores assessing symptomatology, although there is no strength in determining improvement in functional and electromyographic assessment. The rate of adverse reactions with this technique is low, reported to be <0.1% for major complications, and 2% for minor complications.

The effectiveness of local and systemic corticosteroids has been demonstrated, but whether there is any difference in clinical improvement in patients between one route of administration versus the other remains a question mark.

Rationale for the study In the institution, both intramuscular and ultrasound-guided administration of systemic corticosteroids are part of standard practice, with systemic administration indicated in the trauma department and ultrasound-guided administration in the rheumatology department. Although, given that these are standard practices, retrospective evaluation of the cases could answer the objective of this study, in the review of the cases the investigators found an imbalance in the type of CTS in the cohorts treated in each department. This is mainly due to the fact that in the orthopaedics service most patients consult for CTS and in the rheumatology service, due to the speciality itself, there is a large proportion of patients with secondary CTS (rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile arthritis, gout, etc.). Because of this, and to avoid patient selection bias, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of systemic (intramuscular) corticosteroid treatment with local infiltration in ICTS.

The same efficacy of systemic administration (intramuscular) as local administration (via ultrasound-guided infiltration in the carpal tunnel) should reduce the cost of treatment and the complications associated with local injection. In addition, it would allow effective treatment in centres where there are no specialists trained in the ultrasound-guided infiltration technique, allowing greater generalization of the treatment.

The investigator's hypothesis is that intramuscular corticosteroid infiltration (systemic effect) offers the same results in terms of symptom improvement as locally applied corticosteroids under ultrasound.

The primary objective is to compare the Boston score in patients treated with systemic (intramuscular) versus local infiltration corticosteroids in mild and moderate ICTS at 1.5 months, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-procedure.

The exploratory objectives are to describe adverse reactions associated with the route of administration and to compare the pain at the site of application associated with both methods, in relation to the technique used, measured with the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

106

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years and older
  • Clinical diagnosis of mild/moderate idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (paresthesias in the territory of the median nerve: in fingers 1, 2, 3 and radial border of 4 of the hand, nocturnal hand pain, and Positive Tinel's test, or Positive Phalen's test, or Positive Durkan's test)
  • Diagnosis by electromyography and sensory and motor conduction velocity of mild/moderate involvement
  • Patients who have agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, brachial plexus pathologies, thoracic operculum syndrome
  • Systemic diseases causing secondary Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes with polyneuropathy, hypothyroidism with low adherence to treatment, chronic renal disease)
  • Chronic corticosteroid therapy or regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Severe carpal tunnel syndrome: signs of thenar atrophy, daytime pain, sensory deficit in median nerve territory (two-point discrimination test >10mm)
  • Previous history of wrist or distal radius fracture
  • Corticosteroid allergies
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Branch A: Local corticosteroid infiltration under ultrasound
One dose. 1 ml Betamethasone acetate 6mg/2ml + Betamethasone disodium phosphate 6mg/2ml
Local betamethasone injection under ultrasound in the carpal tunnel, in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome
Experimental: Branch B: treated with intramuscular corticosteroid injection
One dose. 2 ml Betamethasone acetate 6mg/2ml + Betamethasone disodium phosphate 6m/2ml.
betamethasone intramuscular injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months

Compare the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire in patients treated with systemic (intramuscular) versus local infiltration corticosteroids

Two scales:

  • Symptom severity scale (11 questions): sum of the score of each question divided by the number of questions, with the lower limit and lower severity1 , and the upper limit and higher severity 5
  • Functional status scale (8 questions): sum of the score of each question divided by the number of questions, with the lower limit and lower severity 1, and the upper limit and higher severity 5.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse reactions
Time Frame: 12 months
To describe adverse reactions associated with the route of administration.
12 months
Pain at the site of application
Time Frame: 12 months

To compare the pain at the site of application associated with both methods, in relation to the technique used

Visual analogue scale for pain: subjective pain scale, from 0 as the lower limit to 10 as the upper limit, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst possible pain".

12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 11, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 11, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

study that tries not to reveal the identity of the participants

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Local bethametasone injection

3
Subscribe