Betamethasone to Control Postoperative Pain in Emergency Endodontic Care

Periapical Injection of Betamethasone to Control Postoperative Pain in Emergency Endodontic Care - A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial

The objective of this randomized double-blind study was to evaluate the effect of betamethasone in the control of postoperative pain in patients undergoing endodontic treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

To prevent post endodontic treatment pain, systemic administration of corticosteroids may have their effect maximized if the infiltration is performed in the oral mucosa, near the periapex of the tooth, which concentrates the inflammatory process. The administration of corticosteroids at this moment, taking advantage of the anesthetic effect still present, ensures continuous comfort during the postoperative period.

The objective of this randomized double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of the systemic administration of betamethasone - through infiltration in the oral mucosa - to control pain and edemas in patients undergoing emergency endodontic treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minas Gerais
      • Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 39100000
        • Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 72 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals had to have a tooth with pain of endodontic origin justifying emergency care;
  • Individuals diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis or necrosis associated to pericementitis.

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals who presented:

  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Use of corticosteroids;
  • History of hypersensitivity to the drugs used in this study;
  • Pain associated with abscesses of endodontic origin;
  • Individuals with tuberculosis;
  • Individuals with systemic fungal infections;
  • Individuals with simple ocular herpes;
  • Individuals with glaucoma;
  • Individuals with acute psychosis.
  • Individuals with psychotic tendencies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group betamethasone
Active Comparator: betamethasone disodium phosphate at a concentration of 4 mg / ml - dosage of 0.05 mg / kg
The injections were performed with the aid of syringes fitted with ultrafine needles (BD ultrafine U-100, 0.3 x 8 mm), in the buccal mucosa, submucosally near the tooth's periapex of the periapical region of the tooth involved, by using the submucosal infiltration technique.
Other Names:
  • Group 1
Placebo Comparator: Group placebo
sterile saline solution (sodium chloride 0.9% - 1 ml ampoules) - dosage of 0.05 mg / kg
The injections were performed with the aid of syringes fitted with ultrafine needles (BD ultrafine U-100, 0.3 x 8 mm), in the buccal mucosa, submucosally near the tooth's periapex of the periapical region of the tooth involved, by using the submucosal infiltration technique.
Other Names:
  • Group 2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain determined using the "Point Verbal Rating Scale - Modified VRS4"
Time Frame: 4 hours after treatment
During the post-surgical interval of 4 hours, the pain was determined using the "Point Verbal Rating Scale - Modified VRS4"
4 hours after treatment
Pain determined using the "Point Verbal Rating Scale - Modified VRS4"
Time Frame: 24 hours after treatment
During the post-surgical interval of 24 hours, the pain was determined using the "Point Verbal Rating Scale - Modified VRS4"
24 hours after treatment
Pain determined using the "Point Verbal Rating Scale - Modified VRS4"
Time Frame: 48 hours after treatment
During the post-surgical interval of 48 hours, the pain was determined using the "Point Verbal Rating Scale - Modified VRS4"
48 hours after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analgesic consumption
Time Frame: 4 hours after treatment
Each patient was contacted by phone to answer how many analgesic pills have taken. None, 1, 2 or more.
4 hours after treatment
Analgesic consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after treatment
Each patient was contacted by phone to answer how many analgesic pills have taken. None, 1, 2 or more.
24 hours after treatment
Analgesic consumption
Time Frame: 48 hours after treatment
Each patient was contacted by phone to answer how many analgesic pills have taken. None, 1, 2 or more.
48 hours after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marcos P. Pinheiro, PhD, Federal University of Valleys of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Bethametasone

3
Subscribe