Ultrasound Operator Influence on Diagnostics With AI for Thyroid Nodules - Clinial Trial

March 5, 2024 updated by: Axel Bukhave Edström, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

The Ultrasound Operator's Influence on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Thyroid Nodules Assessment - a Clinical Trial

This is a prospective clinical study aiming to test how the experience of the ultrasound operator influences the performance of AI-based (artificial intelligence-based) diagnostics when analysing thyroid nodules on ultrasound scans. The investigators set up an experiment with five stations, each with a patient with a thyroid nodule and an ultrasound machine with the deep learning based system S-Detect for Thyroid installed. 20 study participants where recruited: 8 medical students of novice ultrasound skill, 3 junior ENT (ear-nose-throat) registrars of intermediate ultrasound skill, and 9 senior ENT registrars experienced in ultrasound. The participants scanned all the patients and recorded their analyses of the nodules using the EUTIRADS (European thyroid imagining reporting and data system) system in three different ways: a analysis of their own, S-Detect's analysis, and an analysis combining the two previous.

The hypothesis was that the AI system would perform equally well when between the participant groups. In addition, it was expected that the experienced participants would perform better than the students without AI help, and that the doctors would gain little from AI input, but that the students would have their performance improved by AI input.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Medical students

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Last year student

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Experience with ultrasound beyond that which is taught at the University of Copenhagen

Junior ENT registrar doctors

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Doctor enrolled in introductory training as ENT physician.

Senior ENT registrar doctors

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Doctor enrolled in ENT training.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experiment
20 participants ultrasound scan five patients with thyroid nodules, and assess these nodules themselves, then with the AI-program, and at last they give a combined assessment.
Deep learning based program on Samsung ultrasound machines designed to do real-time semi-automated analysis of thyroid nodules. The ultrasound operator freezes a transverse image of the patient's thyroid nodule and activates S-Detect. The operator selects the nodule on the screen, and the program automatically draws a region of interest. Then S-Detect gives a dichotomous diagnosis of either "Possibly benign" and "Possibly malignant". In addition, it measures the nodule and characterises it with a lexicon based on EUTIRADS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of S-Detect diagnosis
Time Frame: 1 day (day of experiment)
Number of correct thyroid nodule malignancy diagnoses out of total malignancy diagnoses by the AI-based ultrasound diagnostic system "S-Detect" on the five patients' thyroid nodules. Gold standard is cytology and histology of the nodules.
1 day (day of experiment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of biopsy recommendation
Time Frame: 1 day (day of experiment)
Number of correct biopsy recommendations on the five patients' thyroid nodules. Recommendation is derived from EUTIRADS analyses done by participants with and without AI assistance. Gold standard is biopsy recommendation derived from expert consensus EUTIRADS assessment of the nodules.
1 day (day of experiment)
Nodule classification agreement
Time Frame: 1 day (day of experiment)
Agreement of nodule classification with gold standard. Nodule classifications are derived from EUTIRADS done by participants, S-Detect, and participant with S-Detect input on the five patients' thyroid nodules. Gold standard is expert consensus EUTIRADS assessment of the nodules.
1 day (day of experiment)
Accuracy of EUTIRADS scores
Time Frame: 1 day (day of experiment)
Number of correct EUTIRADS scores given by analyses from participants, S-Detect, and participants with S-Detect input on the five patients' thyroid nodules. Gold standard is EUTIRADS score from expert consensus EUTIRADS assessment of the nodules.
1 day (day of experiment)
Nodule measurement
Time Frame: 1 day (day of experiment)
Measurement of the five patients' thyroid nodules done by participants and S-Detect. Gold standard are measurements from expert consensus assessment analysis of the nodules.
1 day (day of experiment)
OSAUS score
Time Frame: 1 day (day of experiment)
Mean OSAUS (objective structured assessment of ultrasound skills) scores of participants as assessed from their ultrasound scans of the five patients. Assessment are independently by two head-and-neck ultrasound experts.
1 day (day of experiment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tobias Todsen, Ph.d, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 4, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thyroid Nodule

Clinical Trials on S-Detect for Thyroid

3
Subscribe