Intensive Weight Loss Intervention Versus Usual Care for Adults With Severe and Complex Obesity (LightWAY)

April 24, 2024 updated by: Carsten Dirksen

Intensive Weight Loss Intervention Versus Usual Care for Adults With Severe and Complex Obesity: the LightWAY Randomised Trial: Lighthouse Consortium on Obesity Management (LightCOM) Trial no 3

In this trial, the aim is to assess the clinical benefits and harms, as well as cost-effectiveness of an intensive weight loss (IWL) intervention that includes total dietary replacements, behavioural support and weight-loss medication compared with existing weight management programmes within primary care for people with severe and complex obesity.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

In the LightWAY trial, an intensive weight loss (IWL) intervention will be compared with with usual care. The IWL lasts two years, and includes total dietary replacements, behavioural support, and weight loss medication in three phases:

  • Induction' phase (week 0-12 after randomisation): total dietary replacement (TDR) programme and behavioural support with weight loss medication (WLM) if rate of weight loss is insufficient.
  • Weight loss continuation' phase (week 13-32 after randomisation): progression of dietary programme including reduction in use of TDR products, reintroduction of healthy foods, with behavioural support, introduction of physical activity, WLM (as required).
  • Maintenance' phase (week 33-104 after randomisation): Continued healthy diet and physical activity with WLM (if required), with return to induction phase if weight regain occurs induction, weight loss continuation, maintenance.

Usual care will differ between the two countries (Denmark and the United Kingdom).

In Denmark, participants will receive a pamphlet on current obesity management guidelines from the Danish National Board of Health, and will be advised to contact their GP for potential referral to local municipality-based obesity management programmes. Furthermore, a notification will be sent to the participant's GP, informing that the participant has been enrolled in the trial and is randomised to usual care. The availability and structure of current obesity programmes varies between municipalities.

In the United Kingdom, participants are eligible for referral into an NHS Tier 3 weight management service. These services are commissioned by integrated care boards, and can therefore differ slightly across the 42 regions within the UK. These are specialist weight management clinics that provide non-surgical, intensive medical management with a multidisciplinary approach to care. These clinics often consist of specialist doctors, nurses, dieticians and physiotherapists/exercise therapists, and include psychological support.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Frederiksberg, Denmark, 2000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Frederiksberg kommune: Social-, Sundheds- og Arbejdsmarkedsområdet
        • Contact:
          • Addie J Frederiksen
      • Frederiksberg, Denmark, 2000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg
        • Contact:
          • Sofus C Larsen
      • Hvidovre, Denmark, 2650
        • Recruiting
        • The Department of Medicine and the Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre
        • Contact:
          • Carsten Dirksen
      • Hvidovre, Denmark, 2650
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hvidovre kommune: Center for Sundhed og Ældre, Hvidovre Sundhedscenter, Sundhed og Forebyggelse
        • Contact:
          • Maria Bleiback Clausen
      • Søborg, Denmark, 2860
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Gladsaxe kommune: Social- og Sundhedsforvaltningen, Sundhed og Rehabilitering
        • Contact:
          • Julie Borgen Braget
      • Oxford, United Kingdom
        • Not yet recruiting
        • IHR CRN: Thames Valley and South Midlands
        • Contact:
          • Susan Jebb

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Please note that participants need to be invited in order to take part in the trial

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years and ≤60 years old at screening.
  2. Has severe and complex obesity i.e. BMI>35 or >32.5 in people with South Asian, Chinese, other Asian, Middle Eastern, Black African or African-Caribbean family backgrounds and with one or more of these specific adiposity-related chronic diseases of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, non-alcoholic steatosis, or sleep apnoea.
  3. Provides informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Intending to become pregnant in the next two years or pregnant or breastfeeding.
  2. Use of WLM or GLP-1 agonist treatment within the last three months.
  3. Currently being treated for cancer other than oestrogen antagonist therapy or non-melanoma skin cancer.
  4. Prior bariatric surgery, not including laparoscopic gastric banding, intragastric balloons or duodenal-jejunal bypass sleeve (Endobarrier™ or similar) if the device has been removed >1 year before screening.
  5. Diagnosis of or treatment for severe eating disorder within the last 6 months.
  6. Any other disease that markedly compromises the participant's ability to adhere to the treatment programme or follow-up or is likely to mean that weight loss will not improve the person's length or quality of life, such as conditions limiting life expectancy.
  7. Conditions that contraindicate or complicate TDR (including type 1 diabetes or other diabetes requiring insulin therapy, phenylketonuria, coeliac disease, or other conditions requiring special diets).
  8. Conditions that contraindicate or complicate GLP-1 treatment (including history of pancreatitis)
  9. Taking part in other research involving multidisciplinary obesity treatment would compromise participation in this trial.
  10. Another member of the household enrolled in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intensive weight loss intervention
The intensive weight loss intervention (IWL) includes total dietary replacements, behavioural support, and weight loss medication. The intervention consists of three phases: induction, weight loss continuation, maintenance, and it will lasts two years in total.
Intensive weight loss intervention, incl. total meal replacements, behavioural support, and weight loss medication.
Active Comparator: Usual care
Denmark: usual care offered by the GP or local municipality. The UK: tier 3 weight management services.
Usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Weight (kg)
104 weeks after randomisation
MetS-Z
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic syndrome severity Z-score (scale from -4 to 4, mean is 0, higher scores indicate a worse outcome)
104 weeks after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait speed
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
4-metre gait speed (m/s)
104 weeks after randomisation
Short-Form-36, mental component score
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Quality of life, SF36-mental component score (scale from 0-100, higher scores indicate better mental health)
104 weeks after randomisation
Weight loss (20%)
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Proportion of participants with weight loss ≥20%
104 weeks after randomisation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Labour market attachment - WPAI
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Work productivity and impairment (WPAI) score points (scale from 0-100, higher scores indicate more limitations in ability to work and lower productivity)
104 weeks after randomisation
Labour market attachment - days of sick leave
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Self-reported number of days sick leave during follow-up
104 weeks after randomisation
Health economy: Within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis - costs
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
24-month costs, DKK
104 weeks after randomisation
Health economy: Within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis - QALY
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Incremental cost per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) gained, DKK
104 weeks after randomisation
Health economy: Model-based cost-effectiveness analysis - QALY
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Predicted lifetime QALYs gained
104 weeks after randomisation
Health economy: Model-based cost-effectiveness analysis - healthcare costs
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Predicted lifetime healthcare costs, DKK
104 weeks after randomisation
Health economy: Model-based cost-effectiveness analysis - cost effectiveness ratios
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Long-term incremental cost effectiveness ratios
104 weeks after randomisation
Long-term effects - prescription patterns
Time Frame: 5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
  1. Proportion of participants on glucose-lowering medications
  2. Proportion of participants on lipid-lowering medications
  3. Proportion of participants on blood pressure-lowering medications
  4. Proportion of participants on medication for pain relief
  5. Proportion of participants on weight loss medication
  6. Proportion of participants on medication used for psychiatric disorders (antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics)
5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
SAE
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event during the intervention period (according to ICH-GCP guidelines)
104 weeks after randomisation
Incident eating disorders
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Proportion of participants with incident eating disorders during the intervention period
104 weeks after randomisation
Body composition - waist circumference
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Waist circumference (cm)
104 weeks after randomisation
Body composition - fat percentage
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
  1. Body fat percentage
  2. Visceral fat percentage
  3. Subcutaneous fat percentage
104 weeks after randomisation
Body composition - weight loss (10%)
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Proportion of participants with weight loss ≥10%
104 weeks after randomisation
Physical functioning - SENS
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Objectively measured moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) using SENS Motion accelerometers (hours/day)
104 weeks after randomisation
Physical functioning - SF-36
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Short Form 36 (SF-36) physical component score (scale from 0-100, higher scores indicate better physical health)
104 weeks after randomisation
Physical functioning - sit to stand test
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Number of sit to stands completed in the 30 Second Sit to Stand test
104 weeks after randomisation
Sleep
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Sleep duration using SENS Motion accelerometers (hours/day)
104 weeks after randomisation
Medications during the intervention period
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
  1. Proportion of participants prescribed glucose-lowering medications (number, type)
  2. Proportion of participants prescribed lipid-lowering medications (number, type)
  3. Proportion of participants prescribed blood pressure-lowering medications (number, type)
  4. Proportion of participants prescribed medication for pain relief (number, type)
  5. Proportion of participants prescribed use of medications for psychiatric disorders (number, type)
104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic health - blood pressure
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic health - pulse
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Pulse rate (beats per minute)
104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic health - Hb1Ac
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Haemoglobin A1c (mmol/mol)
104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic health - insulin
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Fasting insulin concentration (pmol/L)
104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic health - HOMA2-IR
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
HOMA2-IR (calculated from glucose and C-peptide concentration) (ratio)
104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic health - lipids
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Fasting lipid profile (HDL, LDL and triglycerides) (mmol/L)
104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic health - eGFR
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), creatinine (µmol/L), calculated from creatinine, sex and years
104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic health - hsCRP
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), mg/L
104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic health - Fib4
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Fib-4 (ALT/AST/platelets) (ratio)
104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic health - proteinuria
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Proteinuria, measured as urine albumin/creatinine (ratio)
104 weeks after randomisation
Metabolic health - TSH
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (IU/L)
104 weeks after randomisation
Mental health - MDI
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Major Depression Inventory (MDI) (scale from 0-50, higher scores indicate more symptoms of depression)
104 weeks after randomisation
Mental health - WBIS-M
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-M) score (scale from 1-7, higher scores indicate higher degree of internalised weight bias)
104 weeks after randomisation
Mental health - EDE-Q
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) score (scale from 0 to 6, higher scores indicate higher degree of eating disorder)
104 weeks after randomisation
Genetic profiles' (using comprehensive genetic mapping) association with the metabolic and/or weight loss response to IWL vs usual care
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
  1. Common gene variants with low to moderate effect on the phenotype for the construction of aggregate genetic risk scores
  2. Rare variants with potential functional effects in genes known to harbour high-impact obesity variants e.g. MC4R, LEP, LEPR, POMC, PCSK1, SIM1, NTRK2, MC3R, MRAP2, BDNF, SH2B1, KSR2
104 weeks after randomisation
Long-term effects - mortality and major cardiovascular disease (CVD)
Time Frame: 5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
  • Proportion of participants who die from any cause
  • Proportion of participants with a major CVD outcome consisting of any of the following (each of the components will be assessed exploratively): myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalisation for angina, coronary-artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, hospitalisation for heart failure, peripheral vascular disease
5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Long-term effects - incident cancer
Time Frame: 5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
  1. Proportion of participants with any diagnosis of cancer
  2. Proportion of participants with cancers known to be associated with obesity: GI tract including liver and kidney and reproduction organs (including breast for women and prostate for men)
5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Long-term effects - fracture risk
Time Frame: 5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
  1. Proportion of participants with major osteoporotic fracture (hip, spine, wrist)
  2. Proportion of participants with any fracture
5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Long-term effects - health economic and labour market attachment, employment status
Time Frame: 5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Employment status for each participant
5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Long-term effects - health economic and labour market attachment, salary
Time Frame: 5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Salary for each participant
5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Long-term effects - health economic and labour market attachment, absence
Time Frame: 5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Number of absence days
5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Long-term effects - health economic and labour market attachment, sick leave
Time Frame: 5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Proportion of participants with any sick leave
5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Long-term effects - health economic and labour market attachment, long-term sick leave
Time Frame: 5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Proportion of participants with long-term sick leave (more than 4 weeks continuous sickness absence)
5, 10 and 20 years after randomisation
Bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by DXA
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
  1. Bone mineral density (g/cm²) of hip (total hip and femoral neck),
  2. Bone mineral density (g/cm²) of lumbar region
104 weeks after randomisation
Health economy: Within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis - quality of life, index score
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Quality of life (measured using the 5-level EQ-5D version, EQ-5D-5L index score (score between -1 and 1, higher scores indicate better health)
104 weeks after randomisation
Health economy: Within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis - quality of life, VAS
Time Frame: 104 weeks after randomisation
Quality of life (measured using the 5-level EQ-5D version, EQ-5D-5L VAS score (scale from 0-100, higher scores indicate better health)
104 weeks after randomisation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Carsten Dirksen, Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2048

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LightWAY

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After the results have been published, the aim is to make a depersonalised dataset publicly available on e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov and/or the European Union (EU) Zenodo database (https://zenodo.org/). The final choice will reflect which platform(s) that are compliant with current legislation at that time.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

When the results have been published

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers with a protocol for their planned study

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Usual care

3
Subscribe