- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06350305
Screening for High-risk Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
April 9, 2024 updated by: Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Screening Study at High-risk Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
This study is a multicenter cross-sectional study design aimed at screening risk factors for the combination of disease and syndrome in high-risk individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Targeting high-risk populations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), targeted at key issues such as unclear risk factors and lack of prevention and treatment plans, high-risk population screening was conducted to identify risk factors.
This study is expected to detect at least 3600 high-risk individuals with early-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
The incidence rate of high-risk individuals in the early stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is 30%, which means the total screening population is 12000 cases.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
3600
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: yang Xie, doctor
- Phone Number: 0371-66248624
- Email: xieyanghn@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
Henan
-
Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450000
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine
-
Contact:
- yang Xie, doctor
- Phone Number: 0371-66248624
- Email: xieyanghn@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
According to the Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Revised in 2021), a multi-stage cluster random sampling method was used to select individuals from representative administrative villages with a history of chronic cough or sputum production, breathing difficulties, recurrent lower respiratory tract infections, and/or exposure to potential risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- According to the Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Revised in 2021), a multi-stage cluster random sampling method was used to select individuals from representative administrative villages with a history of chronic cough or sputum production, breathing difficulties, recurrent lower respiratory tract infections, and/or exposure to potential risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- The investigators agreed to participate in this clinical study by voluntarily signing an informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are delirious, have impaired consciousness, dementia, various psychiatric disorders, etc., and cannot be accurately informed of their basic physical condition.
- Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, are not suitable for participation in this study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
COPD screening questionnaire from Terrassa (EGARPOC)
Time Frame: During screening
|
3-29 scores.
Scores for each questionnaire item were tallied based on the participant's responses, and if the total score was ≥13, the participant needed to be seen by a physician for further testing to determine if they had COPD.
|
During screening
|
COPD assessment in primary care to identify undiagnosed respiratory disease and exacerbation risk questionnaire (CAPTURE)
Time Frame: During screening
|
0-6 scores.
Scores for each questionnaire item were tallied based on the participant's responses, and if the total score was ≥2, the participant needed to be seen by a physician for further testing to determine if they had COPD.
|
During screening
|
COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
Time Frame: During screening
|
0-40 scores.
Scores for each questionnaire item were tallied based on the participant's responses, and if the total score was >10, the participant needed to be seen by a physician for further testing to determine if they had COPD.
|
During screening
|
COPD screening questionnaire (COPD-Q)
Time Frame: During screening
|
0-10 scores.
Scores for each questionnaire item were tallied based on the participant's responses, and if the total score was ≥4, the participant needed to be seen by a physician for further testing to determine if they had COPD.
|
During screening
|
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnostic questionnaire (CDQ)
Time Frame: During screening
|
0-38 scores.
Scores for each questionnaire item were tallied based on the participant's responses, and if the total score was ≥17, the participant needed to be seen by a physician for further testing to determine if they had COPD.
|
During screening
|
modified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnostic questionnaire (mCDQ)
Time Frame: During screening
|
0-45 scores.
Scores for each questionnaire item were tallied based on the participant's responses, and if the total score was ≥18, the participant needed to be seen by a physician for further testing to determine if they had COPD.
|
During screening
|
Simple screening questionnaire
Time Frame: During screening
|
0-11 scores.
Scores for each questionnaire item were tallied based on the participant's responses, and if the total score was ≥6, the participant needed to be seen by a physician for further testing to determine if they had COPD.
|
During screening
|
lung function questionnaire (LFQ)
Time Frame: During screening
|
5-25 scores.
Scores for each questionnaire item were tallied based on the participant's responses, and if the total score was ≤18, the participant needed to be seen by a physician for further testing to determine if they had COPD.
|
During screening
|
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaire (COPD-SQ)
Time Frame: During screening
|
0-38 scores.
Scores for each questionnaire item were tallied based on the participant's responses, and if the total score was ≥16, the participant needed to be seen by a physician for further testing to determine if they had COPD.
|
During screening
|
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population screener questionnaire (COPD-PS)
Time Frame: During screening
|
0-10 scores.
Scores for each questionnaire item were tallied based on the participant's responses, and if the total score was ≥5, the participant needed to be seen by a physician for further testing to determine if they had COPD.
|
During screening
|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Risk Scale (COPDRS)
Time Frame: During screening
|
0-9 scores.
Scores for each questionnaire item were tallied based on the participant's responses, and if the total score was ≥5, the participant needed to be seen by a physician for further testing to determine if they had COPD.
|
During screening
|
Standardised Scale of Physical Fitness in Chinese Medicine
Time Frame: During screening
|
Answer all the questions in the Classification and Determination of Physical Qualities in Chinese Medicine Table.
Each question is rated on a 5-point scale, and the raw and transformed scores are calculated to determine the type of physical qualities according to the criteria.
Raw score = sum of the scores of each entry.
Transformation score = [(raw score - number of entries)/(number of entries × 4)] × 100.
|
During screening
|
Syndrome therapeutic evaluation scale of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-STES)
Time Frame: During screening
|
Subjects should fill in the relevant entries truthfully according to the category of symptoms as judged by the doctor and tick the appropriate box.
Among them, the part of tongue and pulse should be filled in by the doctor.
|
During screening
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 1, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
April 5, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 11, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 9, 2024
Last Verified
April 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Screening for high-risk COPD
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on High-risk COPD
-
Xijing HospitalRecruitingHigh-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (High-risk PCI) | Left Ventricular Assist DevicesChina
-
Array BioPharmaCompletedAML | Advanced and Selected Solid Tumors | High Risk and Very High Risk MDSUnited States, Australia, Italy, Spain, France, Switzerland, United Kingdom
-
George Washington UniversityUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Aga Khan University; Kenya Medical... and other collaboratorsRecruitingPregnancy, High RiskPakistan, Ghana, Kenya, India, Zambia
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingPregnancy, High RiskPakistan, Kenya, Zambia
-
London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRawalpindi Medical CollegeCompletedPregnancy, High RiskPakistan, Zambia
-
University of AarhusCopenhagen University Hospital, HvidovreCompletedAn Adapted Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction Program for Psycho-socially Vulnerable Pregnant Women.Pregnancy, High RiskDenmark
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHigh Risk PregnancyEgypt
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); University... and other collaboratorsCompletedHigh-risk MedicationsUnited States
-
University Hospital, LilleCompletedPregnancy, High RiskFrance
-
University of British ColumbiaNational Institutes of Health (NIH)Completed
Clinical Trials on questionnaire survey
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonCompleted
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterCompleted
-
Institut de Sante Parasport Connecte SynergiesFédération Française Handisport (FFH); Université de Montpellier - UMR Santé...RecruitingDisability or Chronic Disease Leading to DisablementFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRecruitingCervical Cancer | Transgender Persons | Health Services for Transgender PersonsFrance
-
Brno University HospitalRecruiting
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingRectal CancerUnited States
-
Shengjing HospitalActive, not recruitingCareer Burnout | Student BurnoutChina
-
Institut de Sante Parasport Connecte SynergiesAssociation des Paralysees de France (APF)Active, not recruiting
-
Dalarna County Council, SwedenTerminatedOral Leukoplakia | Oral Lichen Planus | ErythroplakiaSweden
-
Brno University HospitalMasaryk UniversityCompletedCovid19 | Distress, EmotionalCzechia