Study of the Fluid Intake Effect During Labour

The Effect of Fluid Intake on the Duration of Labour, Type of Delivery, Well-being of the Pregnant Woman and the Newborn

Ingestion during labor is an issue that has attracted the attention of the scientific community in recent decades, with different practices occurring in different countries. However, the scientific evidence of the risk / benefit of fluid intake in labor is still not fully understood. The aim of this study was to contribute with data that allow the evaluation of an eventual relationship between the amount of fluid ingested during labor and the type of delivery, the duration of labor, the occurrence of nausea and vomiting and the value of the Index of Apgar at the 1st and 5th minutes of the newborn's life. An observational study, with a convenience sample of 144 parturient from two hospitals of Portugal were employed. The analysis was based on recording the before mentioned variables and potentially confounding variables. In order to control for potential sources of bias in the study and to guarantee the homogeneity of the sample in the specific statistical treatment of each dependent variable, an observation grid was drawn up for all the participants in the study. Twenty eight of the parturient, the parturient's ambulation, labour analgesia, food intake during labour, the use of oxytocin during labour, the occurrence of postpartum complications, the birth weight of the newborn and the occurrence of birth complications.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

To carry out the study, authorization was requested from the National Data Protection Commission. Each participant was given a code to ensure the confidentiality and protection of the data collected. The data obtained was recorded on coded sheets (without any element identifying the participant) and entered into a database accessed only by the researcher in charge and processed using the identification code assigned to the participants. The study was also authorized by the Ethics Committee of the Egas Moniz School of Health and Science, by the Ethics Committee of Garcia de Orta Hospital, and by Barreiro Hospital. The data was collected after the informed consent of the pregnant woman/couple, using an observation grid that allowed the variables to be observed and recorded, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

This is an observational study, since the researcher chose not to interfere in the clinical practice of each of the hospital institutions, and nothing was imposed on the pregnant woman/couple.

The analysis was based on recording the variables mentioned above and potentially confounding variables. In order to control for potential sources of bias in the study and to guarantee the homogeneity of the sample in the specific statistical treatment of each dependent variable, an observation grid was drawn up for all the participants in the study, including, in addition to the amount and type of fluid ingested, the type of labour, the assessment of the duration of labour, expressed in the partogram (a sheet recording the progress of labour) in the parturient's file, the occurrence of nausea and vomiting during labour. Apguar index (AI) at the first and fifth minute of life, the age of the parturient, the parturient's ambulation, labour analgesia, food intake during labour, the use of oxytocin during labour, the occurrence of complications in the postpartum period, the weight of the Newborn (NB) at birth and the occurrence of complications during labour.

The target population was primiparous women with low-risk, full-term pregnancies with cephalic fetuses and spontaneous onset of labour. The sample size was determined by the Gpower 3.1® programme, according to the statistical analysis to be carried out and with a 95% confidence interval, which suggested an sample number of 150. This was a convenience sample made up of pregnant women who had signed an informed consent form at Garcia de Orta Hospital and at Barreiro Hospital and who met the inclusion criteria. All parturients with associated pathologies, either previous or during pregnancy, medium or high-risk pregnancies and who develop problems during labour, such as hyperthermia, hypotension, hypoglycaemia, lipothymia, fetuses with cardiotocographic alterations and NB with tight cervical circles at birth were excluded. Pregnant women who did not walk and who were not given intravenous oxytocin during labour were also excluded in order to standardize the sample, as were all the parturients who did not consent to their data being used.

An assessment was made of the volume capacity of the water glasses, using duly certified 50 mL syringes, in order to calibrate and control the correct measurement of the amount of water ingested. The water was measured using a graduated glass, since its water intake policy is governed by the formula 1ml/kg/hour of clear liquids (water or tea). Subsequently, an observation grid was drawn up for all the participants in the study, and the data was collected and integrated into the observation grid directly from the pregnant women present in the delivery room.

The data was processed and analysed statistically using IBM SPSS™ version 24 software. Taking into account the data collected on the observation grid, the sample was descriptively analysed, the assumptions for applying statistical methods were checked and the data was statistically analysed. Bearing in mind the objectives of this study [to see if there is an association between the amount of water ingested during labour (LW) and the type of delivery, the duration of LW, the occurrence of nausea and vomiting, the Apgar score (AI) at the 1st and 5th minute of life of the Newborn (NB)] and the different nature of the variables: scalar - total amount of fluid ingested (mL), duration of labour (hours) and nominal - type of delivery; occurrence of nausea and vomiting; AI at the 1st and 5th minutes, different statistical analyses were used to confirm the null hypothesis as well as testing the normality of the sample distribution for the scalar variables (duration of labour) using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. As the distribution of the variable was not normal ρ ≤ 0.05. The investigators analysed it using non-parametric tests using Spearman's Rho Correlation Coefficient. For the remaining variables, the Logistic Regression test was applied, since this statistical analysis makes it possible to estimate the chances of a given event occurring, given a set of variables. In this case, for example, to identify the risk of dystocia for each mL of fluid ingested.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Monte De Caparica
      • Almada, Monte De Caparica, Portugal, 2829-699
        • Egas Moniz School of Health and Science

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

An initial analysis of the data collected from the total sample of N=171 showed that 16 per cent (N=27) of parturients did not walk (N=10) or were not given oxytocin (N=17). The use of ambulation and oxytocin speeds up the labour process. Therefore, in order to control labour conditions and external influences, as well as to guarantee the homogeneity of the sample, pregnant women who did not walk or were not given oxytocin were excluded. Therefore, the overall sample considered for the descriptive analysis was N= 144.

The overall sample was made up of pregnant women aged between 18 (10.4%) and 39 (0.7%), with an average age of 26.22 ± 5.42. The average weight of the pregnant women was 74.06kg ± 11.62, ranging from 52 (1.4%) to 122kg (0.7%), with the average being 70kg (7.6%).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • low-risk pregnancies
  • term pregnancies (> 37 weeks gestation),
  • primiparous pregnancies
  • fetuses with cephalic presentation
  • with spontaneous onset of labour
  • at the beginning of the active phase of labour (> 4cm dilation).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • parturients with associated pathologies, either previous or during pregnancy, medium or high-risk pregnancies and who develop problems during labour, such as hyperthermia, hypothermia, hypoglycaemia, lipothymia, foetuses with cardiotocographic alterations and NBs with tight cervical circles at birth.
  • pregnant women who did not walk and who were not given intravenous (IV) oxytocin during labour
  • parturients who did not consent to their data being used.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Type of labour
Time Frame: During the labour
The labour type was registered taken in account if eutocic, cup, forceps, caesarean section.
During the labour
Duration of labour
Time Frame: During the labour
The mean value of labour duration in hours (h)
During the labour
Occurrence of nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: During the labour
The frequency of nausea and vomiting episodes in number
During the labour
Apgar index of the newborn (From 0 to 10)
Time Frame: At the 1st and 5th minute of the newborn's life
The apgar index will be analysed by a score from 0 to 10. The 5-minute Apgar score of 7-10 as reassuring, a score of 4-6 as moderately abnormal, and a score of 0-3 as low in the term infant and late-preterm infant and as a nonspecific sign of illness.
At the 1st and 5th minute of the newborn's life

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexandra Bernardo, PhD, Egas Moniz School of Health and Science

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Complication

Clinical Trials on Liquid ingestion during labour

3
Subscribe