The Impact of Commercial Blenderized Formula on Caloric Needs, Gastrointestinal Symptoms, and Gut Microbiome in Children With Cerebral Palsy (CP)

June 27, 2024 updated by: Fernando Navarro, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

The Impact of Commercial Blenderized Formula on Caloric Needs, Gastrointestinal Symptoms, and Gut Microbiome in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Single Center Randomized Open Label Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scale Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scale (GI-PedsQL) differences , to assess the differences in stool microbiome and stool metabolomics , to assess differences in salivary cytokine profile , to assess differences in weight change , to compare the use of antacid medications and to compare the use of laxative medications in patients on commercial formulas (CF) versus commercial blenderized tube feed (CBTF).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with CP receiving >75% of total daily caloric requirements from commercial formulas (CF) via a gastrostomy tube 12french or greater
  • Patients' insurance covers a CBTF
  • Diagnosis of cerebral palsy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving enteral nutrition by transpyloric feeds or jejunal tube.
  • Receiving <75% of total daily energy requirements from a commercial formula
  • Weight or weight for length or body mass index less than the 5th percentile for age or greater than the 85th% percentile for age when plotted on the cerebral palsy growth chart
  • Rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease diagnosis
  • Use of monomeric formulas

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: commercial blenderized tube feed (CBTF)
Based on assessment by a dietician the participant will be fed the commercial blenderized formula to meet their caloric needs
Active Comparator: commercial formulas (CF)
Participant will be fed the commercial formula to meet their caloric needs per standard of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life as assessed by the Pediatric QoL Inventory of GI Symptom Scale.
Time Frame: Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
This is a 74 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always), higher score indicating worse outcome.
Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fecal samples for microbiome analysis (identity, composition, and relative abundance of bacterial taxa in stool specimens)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Change in stool metabolomic profile
Time Frame: Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Mass spectrometry will be used to assess the following metabolites: amino acids, methylated metabolites, bile acids, and nucleotides.
Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Change in salivary cytokine profile
Time Frame: Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Gene expression of the following salivary inflammatory cytokines will be assessed: interleukin-8 (IL-8), toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8), interleukin-26 (IL-26), interleukin-22 (IL-22), C-C motif chemokine receptor type 1 (CCR1), Caspase 2 (CASP2), toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8), and Intercellular adhesion molecule 3 (ICAM3).
Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Change in stool caliber using the Bristol stool scale
Time Frame: Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)

The Bristol stool scale categorizes stool into one of 7 types, as follows. Types 1 and 2 indicate constipation, with 3 and 4 being the ideal stools as they are easy to defecate while not containing excess liquid, and 6 and 7 indicate diarrhea.

Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (difficult to pass) Type 2: Sausage-shaped, but lumpy Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (average stool) Type 5: Soft blobs with clear cut edges Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool (diarrhea) Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid (diarrhea)

Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Number of participants who needed to add or remove antacid or laxative medications from their bowel regimen
Time Frame: Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Medications in the bowel regimen include antacids and laxatives.
Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Number of participants who had dose adjustments to their antacid or laxative medications
Time Frame: Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Change in weight
Time Frame: Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Change in weight percentile
Time Frame: Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)
Baseline, end of study (2 months after baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fernando Navarro, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on commercial blenderized tube feed (CBTF)

Subscribe