Erector Spinae Plane Block v.s Patient Controlled Analgesia in Correction Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis

December 6, 2024 updated by: Ren Liao, West China Hospital

Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block v.s Patient Controlled Analgesia in Correction Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Scoliosis correction surgery involves extensive surgical wounds, intense intraoperative stimulation, and severe postoperative pain, often necessitating the use of potent opioids. However, there is a critical clinical need for effective pain management strategies that both ensure sufficient analgesia and minimize opioid-related adverse effects. The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) has shown promise as an effective analgesic technique, but its application in scoliosis correction surgery has not been reported.We hypothesize that ESPB provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA) pumps. Specifically, ESPB is expected to significantly reduce postoperative pain scores, decrease perioperative opioid consumption, and mitigate opioid-related side effects.

This study is a randomized controlled trial involving 40 participants undergoing scoliosis correction surgery, randomized into two groups: the ESPB group and the PCA group. The primary outcome measure is the resting pain score at 2 hours postoperatively, which will be used to evaluate the efficacy of ESPB. Secondary outcomes include perioperative opioid consumption and the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects. The study aims to provide evidence for ESPB as an innovative and effective method for postoperative analgesia in scoliosis correction surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Scoliosis correction surgery involves large surgical wounds spanning multiple vertebrae, requiring sufficient analgesia to manage intense intraoperative stimulation and severe postoperative pain. Effective pain control in this context often necessitates potent opioids, such as morphine or equivalent drugs. Current perioperative analgesia strategies include intraoperative use of long-acting opioids (e.g., sufentanil, fentanyl) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps for postoperative pain management, primarily involving opioids like sufentanil or morphine. However, opioids are associated with adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, bowel obstruction, pruritus, dizziness, respiratory depression, opioid tolerance, and hyperalgesia, which can lead to suboptimal pain control and negatively impact patients' quality of life and postoperative recovery. There is a critical need for effective analgesic methods in scoliosis correction surgery that minimize opioid-related adverse effects, enhance the patient experience, and promote accelerated recovery.

The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) was first reported by Forero et al. in 2016 as an effective analgesic technique for rib-related neuropathic pain. Its mechanism involves the injection of local anesthetics into the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process, allowing for the diffusion of the anesthetic to adjacent areas. ESPB exerts its primary analgesic effect through the posterior branches of spinal nerves and can further diffuse anteriorly to paravertebral and epidural spaces, and laterally across the costotransverse foramina, affecting nerve roots and visceral structures. This mechanism provides comprehensive analgesia. ESPB has since been widely applied in perioperative pain management for thoracic surgery, shoulder arthroscopy, breast surgery, abdominal surgery, cesarean sections, and urological procedures, as well as for acute and chronic pain conditions such as rib fractures, postherpetic neuralgia, burns, and cancer pain.

Studies have demonstrated that ESPB effectively reduces postoperative pain scores, decreases opioid consumption, delays the need for rescue analgesics, reduces the number of patients requiring rescue medication, and lowers the incidence of nausea and vomiting in spinal surgeries. Although there are limited case reports and clinical experience summarizing its perioperative analgesic effect in scoliosis correction surgery, preliminary findings suggest it is effective.

Based on the analgesic mechanism of ESPB and prior studies, we hypothesize that ESPB provides superior postoperative pain control compared to PCA, significantly reducing postoperative pain scores, perioperative opioid consumption, and associated adverse effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • West China Hospital, Sichuan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 14 years or older, regardless of gender.
  • Scheduled for scoliosis correction surgery.
  • Signed informed consent from the participant or their legal guardian.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to local anesthetics such as ropivacaine.
  • Family history of malignant hyperthermia.
  • Severe systemic diseases affecting the heart, lungs, liver, or kidneys.
  • Neurological or psychiatric disorders.
  • Communication difficulties, such as hearing impairment or speech disorders.
  • Concurrent participation in other clinical studies.
  • Other conditions deemed unsuitable for participation by the investigators.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ESPB Group
Participants will receive ultrasound-guided ESPB preoperatively, using 40 ml of 0.3% ropivacaine.
Participants will receive ultrasound-guided ESPB preoperatively, using 40 ml of 0.3% ropivacaine.
Active Comparator: PCA Group
Participants will receive postoperative PCA with a formulation of 200 µg sufentanil diluted to 100 ml. The PCA settings will include a background dose of 3 ml/hour, a lockout time of 15 minutes, and a bolus dose of 2 ml.
Participants will receive postoperative PCA with a formulation of 200 µg sufentanil diluted to 100 ml. The PCA settings will include a background dose of 3 ml/hour, a lockout time of 15 minutes, and a bolus dose of 2 ml.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resting numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores
Time Frame: 2 hours postoperatively
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a tool for assessing pain intensity, allowing patients to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain," 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable," and pain levels are categorized as 0 (no pain), 1-3 (mild pain), 4-6 (moderate pain), and 7-10 (severe pain).
2 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severe complications
Time Frame: 30 days postoperatively
The incidence of severe complications are categorized into five grades based on severity: Grade I (resolved with temporary treatment, e.g., postoperative nausea and vomiting), Grade II (prolonged hospital stay required, e.g., pneumonia requiring antibiotics), Grade III (life-threatening events requiring intervention but recoverable during hospitalization, e.g., deep vein thrombosis), Grade IV (significant harm persisting 30 days or longer with a marked decrease in quality of life, e.g., postoperative cognitive dysfunction or delirium), and Grade V (death within 30 days postoperatively).
30 days postoperatively
Postoperative resting NRS pain scores
Time Frame: 3 days after surgery
Resting NRS pain scores on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3
3 days after surgery
Postoperative NRS pain scores during movement
Time Frame: 3 days after surgery
NRS pain scores during movement on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3.
3 days after surgery
Postoperative opioids consumption
Time Frame: 30 days postoperatively
Opioids will be used as a rescue measure for acute pain, including sulfentanil, fentanil, and morphine. Sulfentanil or fentanil will be given to the participants in PACU when the NRS scores higher than 4. When a participant's resting NRS pain score exceeds 4 in the ward, 5 mg of morphine can be administered intravenously. If the effect is insufficient, an additional 5 mg may be given after 30 minutes, with a maximum daily dose of 20 mg.
30 days postoperatively
Time to initiate functional exercises
Time Frame: 30 days postoperatively
Duration from hospital admission to the first attempt at mobilization, either preoperatively or postoperatively (in days)
30 days postoperatively
Total length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 7 days after discharge
Duration from hospital admission to discharge (in days)
7 days after discharge
Postoperative length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 7 days after discharge
Duration from the day of surgery to discharge (in days)
7 days after discharge
Total hospital cost
Time Frame: 7 days after discharge
Total hospital cost
7 days after discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ren Liao, M.D., West China Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will be shared after de-identification.The shared data will include de-identified individual participant data, and metadata supporting the primary and secondary outcomes, as well as the study protocol.Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the main study results and ending 3 years following publication. Requests for data sharing should be directed to the corresponding author (liaoren7733@163.com). Upon approval of a formal proposal, a data-sharing agreement will be signed, and access will be granted through a secure datasharing platform.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the main study results and ending 3 years following publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests for data sharing should be directed to the corresponding author: liaoren7733@163.com.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Plane Block

Clinical Trials on ESPB

Subscribe