- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06246292
The Efficacy and Safety of Landmark-guided Compared to Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Techniques for Analgesia in Female Patients After Breast Surgery.
February 4, 2024 updated by: Alexandria University
Erector Spinae Plane Block: Anatomical Landmark Versus Ultra-sounded Guided Technique, a Randomized Controlled Trial
The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a technique that helps alleviate acute pain.
It involves injecting local anesthetic between the erector spinae muscle (ESM) and the vertebra's transverse process (TP).
This technique can be guided by ultrasound or anatomical landmarks, and it can be performed while the patient is lying down, sitting or on their side.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Ultrasound guidance has established itself as the norm for regional anesthesia procedures, enabling live visualization of anatomical structures and enhancing the precision and safety of needle insertion.
Conversely, the blind technique relies on anatomical landmarks and the ability to palpate to direct needle insertion.
Although the blind technique might provide simplicity and efficiency, uncertainties persist concerning its precision and possible associated risks.
As the popularity of the ESPB increases, a relevant query emerges: Should it be conducted with ultrasound guidance or through a non-guided technique?
This study was designed to validate the efficacy and safety of a landmark-guided ESPB technique compared to an ultrasound-guided ESPB technique for analgesia in breast surgery.
The hypothesis was that the ultrasound and anatomical landmark techniques for ESPB would provide equivalent analgesia.
The study's primary objective was to compare the success rate of both techniques.
The secondary objectives were to compare the dermatomal block spread, analgesic effectiveness, and technique-related complications.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
248
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt, 21521
- faculty of medicine, Alexandria Unverisity
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18 years or older.
- Patients had an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical score of I-II.
- Patients undergoing unilateral elective breast surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients had a contraindication to an ESPB (including coagulopathy, recent anticoagulant medication usage, or infection at the needle puncture site).
- Patients had a history of opioid addiction, preoperative opioid use, and allergies to study medications.
- Obesity (body mass index exceeding 35 kg/m²).
- If the placement of ESPB was not completed due to technique difficulties.
- Patients who expressed a lack of willingness to participate in the study were not considered eligible for participation.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: landmark guided ESPB technique
The ESPB was performed using the landmarks described by Vadera et al. (5).
Before initiating the block procedure, the spinous process of the T4 vertebra and a point situated 3 cm to its side are marked at the appropriate level.
The needle was inserted perpendicularly to the skin and advanced in all planes until it contacts the vertebra's transverse process.
The depth at which the thoracic vertebra's transverse process lies from the skin can vary, ranging from 2 to 4 cm, contingent upon the individual's physique.
The needle tip was positioned between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process.
The volume of local anesthetics was injected in this plane.
|
The ESPB is a truncal block guided by anatomical landmarks, involving the injection of local anesthetic beneath the erector spinae muscle (ESM), positioned between the ESM and the transverse process (TP) of the vertebra.
|
Active Comparator: ultrasound-guided ESPB technique
The block was performed based on the original description by Forero et al. (2).
A high-frequency linear transducer (MyLab 70 Xvision, Esaote SpA, Florence, Italy) was positioned in the parasagittal plane 2 cm lateral to the T4 vertebra.
Once the transverse process and the overlying erector spinae muscle were visible on the ultrasound, the needle was introduced using the in-plane technique.
The needle was inserted in the cranial-to-caudal direction until it reached the tip of the transverse process.
Following a negative aspiration and a successful hydro dissection, the local anesthetic solution was injected beneath the erector spinae muscle's fascia.
|
The ESPB is a truncal block guided by ultrasound, involving the injection of local anesthetic beneath the erector spinae muscle (ESM), positioned between the ESM and the transverse process (TP) of the vertebra.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
To compare the success rate of both landmark-guided ESPB and ultrasound-guided ESPB techniques for analgesia in breast surgery
Time Frame: 30 minutes after regional block procedure
|
The primary outcome was the binary outcome: therapeutic success or failure of ESPB techniques in achieving cutaneous sensory block for breast surgery (from T1 to T6).
|
30 minutes after regional block procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
To compare the dermatomal block spread in both groups
Time Frame: 30 minutes after regional block procedure.
|
Assessment of the number of blocked cutaneous sensory dermatomes from T1 to T10.
|
30 minutes after regional block procedure.
|
To compare the analgesic effectiveness in both groups
Time Frame: The first 24 hours postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours.
|
Assessment of rest visual analog score (VAS) for surgical site pain (0 -10) 2.
|
The first 24 hours postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours.
|
To compare the technique-related complications in both groups
Time Frame: During the regional block procedure.
|
Assessment of occurrence of adverse effects.
|
During the regional block procedure.
|
To compare the analgesic effectiveness in both groups
Time Frame: The first 24 hours postoperatively.
|
The time (minutes) to the first intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) demand dose.
|
The first 24 hours postoperatively.
|
To compare the analgesic effectiveness in both groups
Time Frame: intra- and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Total fentanyl opioid consumption (microgram).
|
intra- and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Islam elbardan, Dr., University of Alexandria
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 10, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 4, 2024
First Posted (Estimated)
February 7, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
February 7, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 4, 2024
Last Verified
January 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB number: 00012098
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Nerve Block
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteUnknownInferior Alveolar Nerve Block | Greater Palatine Nerve BlockCanada
-
Diskapi Teaching and Research HospitalCompletedArthroscopic Shoulder Surgery | Suprascapular Nerve Block | Axillary Nerve BlockTurkey
-
Tanta UniversityRecruitingArthroscopic Shoulder Surgery | Anterior Suprascapular Nerve Block | Interscalene Nerve BlockEgypt
-
Bozyaka Training and Research HospitalCompletedPeripheral Nerve Block | Foot and Ankle Surgery | Popliteal Nerve BlockTurkey
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanySuspendedAnesthesia, Local | Brachial Plexus Block | Nerve BlockGermany
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedPericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block) | Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane BlockEgypt
-
University Hospital, AntwerpCompletedSurgery | Anesthesia | Brachial Plexus Block | Nerve BlockBelgium
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Brachial Plexus Block | Nerve BlockTurkey
-
Menoufia UniversityCompletedPericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block) | Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane BlockEgypt
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Anatomical landmark-guided ESPB
-
Kenichiro YamagataCompletedAtrial Fibrillation | Peripheral Vascular Disease | Vascular Access ComplicationsCzechia, Japan
-
Aga Khan University Hospital, PakistanCompleted
-
Universiti Sains MalaysiaCompletedWounds and InjuriesMalaysia
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedDialysis Catheter; MalpositionEgypt
-
Chosun University HospitalRecruiting
-
Antonios LikourezosTerminated
-
Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityRecruiting
-
Aksaray UniversityNot yet recruitingTracheostomy Complication | Percutaneous Tracheostomy | Airway Trauma | Tracheostomy HemorrhageTurkey
-
Andrews Research & Education FoundationAmerican Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM)CompletedKnee OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterTerminated