Structured Rehabilitation Program for Patients With Total Knee Replacement

August 23, 2021 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Structured Rehabilitation Program on Pain and Function in Patients With Total Knee Replacement

This study will be a randomized controlled trial. This study will be conducted in Horizon Hospital Lahore. A sample size of 26 patients will be taken. Patients will be divided into two groups by lottery method. Group A will be treated with Structured Rehabilitation program along with conventional physiotherapy while Group B will be treated with conventional physiotherapy only. Both groups will receive treatment for 4 weeks,3 sessions per week. The outcome measures Numeric pain rating scale(NPRS),6 minutes' walk test and Womac scale will be measured at baseline and at the end of 4th week. Data will be analyzed by SPSS 25.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Total knee replacement (TKR) is the most common, gold standard surgical intervention in relieving pain, improving physical functions and quality of life in end-stage osteoarthritis.An estimated 25-47% of patients who are eligible for primary joint replacement in the United Kingdom have isolated unicompartmental osteoarthritis, and would be eligible to receive either implant.

Adequate post-operative pain control in TKR patients is very important as inadequate pain control can lead to delayed mobilization, prolonged hospital stay, deep vein thrombosis with embolic events, increased psychological stress thereby increasing morbidity and mortality of TKR patients.Physiotherapy, principally exercise prescription and gait re- education, is advocated for people after THR and TKR.Surgeons are particularly concerned regarding cementless implants, given they rely on press fit fixation in the surrounding bone for primary stability.Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty often have unfulfilled expectations from the surgery that can lead to dissatisfaction.Patients have a poor understanding of outcomes related to total knee replacement (TKR) surgery, with most patients underestimating the potential benefits and overestimating the risk of complications.To prevent chronic pain after TKR, several perioperative interventions show benefits and merit further research. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has been successfully adopted across a range of procedures with using rehabilitation program. This study will focus on effects of structured rehabilitation program of 4 weeks with different goals in each week for reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Study will provide a structured rehabilitation program for the physiotherapist to achieve all goals in three phases (protective, Recovery & Activity phase).

AP Antony-Leo 2019 in this RCT study improvements occurred by following structured rehabilitation care,quality of life and joint specific outcomes through medial parapatellear approach.Andrew David Beswick. In TKR to prevent chronic pain, showing benefits by using several perioperative interventions.In this systematic review the patients with osteoarthritis achieve long term outcomes after TKR by using perioperative interventions. In evidence base review enhanced recovery after surgery had already been used successfully in various surgical specialities. This evidence-based review provides an insight into the best evidence linked to each component and their rationale for inclusion in the proposed enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Arijit Goshi 2019. In this evidence base review enhanced recovery programmes require a multidisciplinary team of dedicated professionals, principally involving preoperative education, multimodal pain control and accelerated rehabilitation; this will be enhanced if combined with minimally invasive surgery. The current economic environment and restricted healthcare budget further necessitate brief hospitalisation while minimising costs.MS Ibrahim 2019.C.E.H Scott 2019. The patient satisfaction rate of 81.4 % at 12 month in this study is comparable to other studies.In this prospective study it is important to clear that whether dissatisfaction is a consequence of surgical technique, implant design, patient selection, or counselling and the management of expectation. This study provided knowledge about to help patient selection and counselling. Soren T.Sku 2019 in an RCT study in patients with knee osteoarthritis who were eligible for total knee replacement, treatment with total knee replacement followed by nonsurgical treatment resulted in greater pain relief and functional improvement after 12 month as compared to nonsurgical treatment.Literature shows that postoperative rehabilitation for total knee replacement is of prime importance and improves postoperative outcomes and it would be more beneficial to divide outcome goals in phases so as to achieve these goals according to week wise distribution

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Pakistan
    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Horizon Hospital Lahore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patient with unilateral or bilateral total knee replacement through medial parapatellar approach.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients awaiting revision TKR
  • Post traumatic patients planned for TKR
  • Those with non-degenerative joint diseases
  • Patients got infected after operation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Structured rehabilitation program
Structured rehabilitation program & conventional physical therapy
Other: Structured Rehabilitation Program
Early Function Phase (Protective phase) week 1 Progressive Function Phase (Recovery Phase) 2nd and 3rd week Advance Function Phase (Activity Phase) 4th week
Other: Conventional Physical Therapy
• Rapid post-operative mobilization • Range of motion exercises started • Passive extension by placing pillow under foot • Flexion-by dangling the leg over the side of bed • Muscle strengthening exercises • Weight bearing is allowed on 1st post-operative
Active Comparator: conventional physical therapy
Other: Conventional Physical Therapy
• Rapid post-operative mobilization • Range of motion exercises started • Passive extension by placing pillow under foot • Flexion-by dangling the leg over the side of bed • Muscle strengthening exercises • Weight bearing is allowed on 1st post-operative

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: 4th week
NPRS is a segmented version of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). It consists of number from 0 to 10. Patient selects a number that best reflects his/her pain intensity where 0 is no pain and 10 is maximum pain. For construct validity, NPRS was highly correlated to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0.86-0.95). The test-retest reliability of this scale is recorded to be 0.96. (Hawker et al. 2011)
4th week
6 Minute walk test
Time Frame: 4th week

The 6-min walk test (6 MWT) is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk distance (6 MWD) provides a measure for integrated global response of multiple cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal systems involved in exercise.

The 6 MWT provides information regarding functional capacity, response to therapy and prognosis across a broad range of chronic cardiopulmonary conditions. Main strengths of the 6 MWT stem from its simplicity in concept and performance, low cost, ease of standardization, and acceptance by test subjects, including those who are deconditioned, elderly, or frail.
4th week
WOMAC SCALE
Time Frame: 4th week
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a widely used, proprietary set of standardized questionnaires used by health professionals to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints. The WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0- 20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68).[2] Physical functioning questions cover everyday activities such as stair use, standing up from a sitting or lying position, standing, bending, walking, getting in and out of a car, shopping, putting on or taking off socks, lying in bed, getting in or out of a bath, sitting, and heavy and light household duties.
4th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC/Lhr/20/1041/M. Arsalan

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee

Clinical Trials on Structured Rehabilitation Program

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Equatorial Guinea

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe