Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Informed Consent Formats by Information Preference and Priority

24. Januar 2018 aktualisiert von: Carnegie Mellon University
This study will test whether different formats of medical informed consent documents can help improve understanding and confidence in decision-making for clinical trials. The study will be primarily run through an online survey.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

The goal of this study is to investigate whether the same information can be communicated in different formats of an informed consent document in ways that improve participant understanding and confidence. Participants will review one of several different versions of the same informed consent document, and will be asked to complete a survey after reading the documents. The survey will ask participants their willingness to enroll in the clinical trial discussed in the document and their confidence in their decision. The survey will also test participants recollection of information from the informed consent document. Researchers will look at this data to see if there are ways to improve knowledge about the clinical trial and confidence in decisions without necessarily changing enrollment preferences.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

500

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 15213
        • Carnegie Mellon University

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 Years Old or Older
  • Read and agreed to informed consent
  • Indicated desire to participate
  • Diagnosed with asthma
  • US resident

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants from whom we receive multiple responses will be dropped from analysis (but will be compensated for participation)

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Grundlegende Wissenschaft
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: Original
Participants will review the full-length, original consent form for the clinical trial.
Participants will review the full-length, original consent form for the clinical trial.
Experimental: Shortened
Participants will review a shortened consent form for the clinical trial, which includes only material indicated as important by 2/3 of participants from a previous study.
Participants will review a shortened consent form for the clinical trial, which includes only material indicated as important by 2/3 of participants from a previous study.
Experimental: Reordered
Participants will review a reordered, shortened consent form. This form is based on the shortened consent form, but the sections are reordered based on a previous study, such that sentences previously rated as more likely to impact a participant's decision is more likely to be presented first (except for an initial introductory section).
Participants will review a reordered, shortened consent form. This form is based on the shortened consent form, but the sections are reordered based on a previous study, such that sentences previously rated as more likely to impact a participant's decision is more likely to be presented first (except for an initial introductory section).
Experimental: Highlighted
Participants will review a shortened consent form with a highlights box, where the highlights box includes the 10 sentences rates as most likely to impact a participant's decision from a previous study.
Participants will review a shortened consent form with a highlights box, where the highlights box includes the 10 sentences rates as most likely to impact a participant's decision from a previous study.
Experimental: Interactive
Participants will review an interactive, shortened consent form, where hyperlinks to different sections of the consent form are provided. The landing page includes the introductory section.
Participants will review an interactive, shortened consent form, where hyperlinks to different sections of the consent form are provided. The landing page includes the introductory section.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Score for high impact questions
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Sum of correct answers (T/F) for any item relating to material that was rated as 50 or higher on impact on willingness to enroll in a previous study.
through study completion, an average of 30 minutes

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Score for low impact questions
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Sum of correct answers (T/F) for any item relating to material that was rated as 49 or lower on impact on willingness to enroll in a previous study.
through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Total score for all questions
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Sum of correct answers (T/F) on full knowledge test.
through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Interaction effect of format and importance on likelihood of correct answer
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Interaction effect in a logistic regression predicting a correct answer, based on the format of the consent form and the importance of the answer.
through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Scores for different information categories
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Sum of correct answers (T/F) for each of the 20 information categories
through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Effect of location on score
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Logistic regression coefficient of likelihood of predicting a correct answer, based upon the location on which the sentence appeared--uses only the shortened, and the reordered conditions. Note that sentences appearing in the introduction (which is the first section of all treatments) must be dropped, as there will be no variation in location.
through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Decision to enroll
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Likert measure of participants hypothetical decision to enroll in the study
through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Confidence in enrollment decision
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Likert measure of participants confidence in hypothetical decision to enroll in the study
through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Satisfaction with consent structure
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Likert measure of participants satisfaction with the consent form
through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Perception of investigator concern for well being
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Likert measure of participants belief in the investigator's concerns for the participant's well-being
through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Perception of investigator transparency
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Likert measure of participants belief that the investigator is trying to communicate information about the trial accurately
through study completion, an average of 30 minutes
Participant's probability estimate of the likelihood that the treatment would help control their asthma
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes

Survey question of the following form:

'If you enrolled in the trial described in the consent form, what is the probability that the treatment could help control your asthma better, where 0% means "no chance at all of helping" and 100% means "would definitely help"?'

Participants provided with drop-down menu including values from 0% to 100% in increments of 1%.

through study completion, an average of 30 minutes

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Participant's free-response text describing what was learned from reading the informed consent document
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 30 minutes

Survey question of the following form:

"What are some of the key things you learned from reading the informed consent document?"

Participants are then provided with an free-response text box where they are allowed to enter whatever text they want, as long as they enter some text. These responses will be coded by two independent coders, blinded to the treatment arms, using an emergent coding system to identify different topics that participants may raise.

through study completion, an average of 30 minutes

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Mitarbeiter

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

27. November 2017

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

31. Dezember 2017

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

31. Dezember 2017

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

8. Januar 2018

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

24. Januar 2018

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

31. Januar 2018

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

31. Januar 2018

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

24. Januar 2018

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Januar 2018

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • STUDY2017_00000268

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Intend to share deidentified participant data, but we want to review the received data to ensure that there is no information that could potentially reveal individual identity that we may not initially anticipate. As such, a clear delineation of what data will be disclosed is not yet available.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Asthma

Klinische Studien zur Original consent form

Abonnieren