Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Comparing Two Acute Care Transition Programs for Older Adults and Their Family Caregivers

16. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
This study investigates better ways to help people after they leave the hospital and how to involve their families in this process. The main goal is to see if adding family support to a patient-centered hospital-to-home intervention helps patients stay safely at home, spend fewer days back in the emergency room or going back into the hospital. The study team also wants to see if the family-centered approach helps improve the patient's ability to do everyday activities without feeling overwhelmed. Two approaches are being compared: one focuses just on the patient, and the other includes special strategies to better support families involved too. Family will be involved in assessing what the patient and family needs. The family-focused approach not only emphasizes the experience, health, and safety of the patient but also the experience of the family member caring for the older adult. The study also involves families in education and provides families skills-building experiences that can help with caregiving stress, problem-solving, and communicating with the healthcare team. The approach will help the family member prepare for their loved one's transition home and provide coaching with the goal of reducing the mental, physical and financial burden of providing care at home. To spread the intervention across many states, the study team will be using telephone calls, video calls, and other technologies as families prefer.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

For all patients, the transition from hospital to home is a vulnerable period, placing them at great risk for adverse events. In a landmark 2003 report on care transitions, investigators found that 19% of patients experience adverse events soon after discharge (many preventable or ameliorable) and 66% experience adverse drug events. Care transitions also impact those around the recently discharged patient - increasing the burden on family members who provide caregiving support. Without communication and engagement in care transitions, family members experience reduced preparedness for their post-discharge caregiving role, increased caregiver burden, social isolation, and reduced mental/physical well-being.

Patient-centered care transitions can be supported through evidence-based interventions. Recent knowledge generated through PCORI's Transitional Care Evidence to Action Network and other research programs has identified remaining evidence gaps. This Phased Large Award for Comparative Effectiveness Research entitled Comparing Two Acute Care Transition Programs for Older Adults and Their Family Caregivers will create new knowledge related to engaging and supporting family caregivers. After optimization in the feasibility phase, briefly, the Phase 2 comparative effectiveness trial will have the following characteristics:

Setting: 20 Acute Care Hospitals across 5 states selected for rural/urban diversity and patient characteristics Sample: Dyads: Older Adults (N = 1,200) discharged to home and their Family Caregivers (N = 1,200)

Comparators:

Comparator A is an active care transition intervention that includes effective strategies focused on the patient.

Comparator B includes all Comparator A active strategies, plus focused family caregiver engagement and support.

Randomization:

1:1 Dyad-level RCT stratified by rural/urban home setting and presence of patient cognitive impairment

Patient-Centered Outcomes Include: Patient remaining safely at home (60-day hospital free days), post-discharge adverse events, patient-reported outcomes (e.g.: role functioning). Also, this study extends beyond prior effectiveness research by assessing family-caregiver-reported outcomes (e.g.: caregiver burden).

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

2560

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

  • Vereinigte Staaten
    • North Carolina
      • Bermuda Run, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 27006
      • High Point, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 27262
      • North Wilkesboro, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 28659
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 27157

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • 65 and older
  • English and Spanish speaking
  • Preadmission location: community dwelling
  • Distance from Hospital: Local and Distant (rural) included
  • Cognitive impairment, dementia allowed
  • Technology Literacy: Flexible from high to low
  • EPIC readmission risk score over 12
  • Discharged home

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted from skilled nursing facility
  • Discharged to skilled nursing facility
  • Left Against Medical Advice (AMA)
  • Planned readmission
  • Died during index admission
  • Caregiver unwilling to participate

Caregiver Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults 18 and older
  • English and Spanish speaking
  • Providing tangible support to patient
  • Distance from Hospital: Local and Distant (rural) included
  • Only Mild Cognitive Impairment allowed
  • Able to be trained in Video Visit Technology
  • Available to support post-discharge

Caregiver Exclusion Criteria:

• Has a greater than a mild cognitive impairment (≤ 22 on MCA)

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: Patient Focused Strategies
An active care transition intervention that includes effective strategies focused on the patient.
Sonstiges: Patient-Centered Intervention
Effective strategies focused on the patient such as patient needs assessment, multi-disciplinary discharge planning, discharge instructions, follow-up education, and follow-up assessments.
Experimental: Patient and Family Focused Strategies
An active care transition intervention that includes effective strategies focused on the patient plus focused family caregiver engagement and support.
Sonstiges: Patient-Centered Intervention
Effective strategies focused on the patient such as patient needs assessment, multi-disciplinary discharge planning, discharge instructions, follow-up education, and follow-up assessments.
Sonstiges: Family Caregiver Enhanced Intervention
Caregiver strategies such as a family caregiver needs assessment, structured education, and skill building.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Hospital-Free Days
Zeitfenster: Day 60
The count of days alive and outside acute care hospitals from discharge to day 60. It will be calculated using EHR and Medicare claims data to objectively capture hospital free days elements (i.e.: mortality days, inpatient days, observation stays, and ED visits).
Day 60

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Number of Hospital-Free Days
Zeitfenster: Day 30, 90, and 180
The count of days alive and outside acute care hospitals from discharge to a specified day. It will be calculated using EHR and Medicare claims data to objectively capture hospital free days elements (i.e.: mortality days, inpatient days, observation stays, and ED visits).
Day 30, 90, and 180
Number of Patient Readmissions
Zeitfenster: Day 30, 60, and 90
All-cause, acute care readmissions calculated as both a count and dichotomous using EHR and Medicare claims data.
Day 30, 60, and 90
Zarit Burden Interview Score
Zeitfenster: Day 60
Caregiver burden will be measured using the 12-item Zarit Burden Interview. Scores will range from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate greater burden.
Day 60
Zarit Burden Interview Score
Zeitfenster: Day 30, 90, and 180
Caregiver burden will be measured using the 12-item Zarit Burden Interview. Scores will range from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate greater burden.
Day 30, 90, and 180
PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities 8-item short form (APS-SF8) Score
Zeitfenster: Day 60
Social role function is one's ability to perform usual social roles and activities (e.g.: leisure, family). It will be measured by using the APS-SF8. Each item is scored using a 5-point Likert scale (1=Never, 5=Always). Scores are typically converted to a standardized T-score, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Day 60
PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities 8-item short form (APS-SF8) Score
Zeitfenster: Day 30, 90 and 180
Social role function is one's ability to perform usual social roles and activities (e.g.: leisure, family). It will be measured by using the APS-SF8. Each item is scored using a 5-point Likert scale (1=Never, 5=Always). Scores are typically converted to a standardized T-score, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Day 30, 90 and 180
Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M) - Patient Satisfaction Score
Zeitfenster: Day 7
Patient satisfaction will be measured using the 9-item PACT-M-1. Scores will range from 9 to 45. Higher scores indicate better perception of the quality of discharge arrangements.
Day 7
Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M) - Patient Self-Efficacy Score
Zeitfenster: Day 30
Patient self-efficacy will be measured using the 8-item PACT-M-2. Scores will range from 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate a better experience with managing care at home.
Day 30
Patient Activation Measures Score
Zeitfenster: Day 60
Patient activation will be measured using the 13-item Patient Activation Measures. Scores will range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge, skills, and confidence for managing their health and health care.
Day 60
Preparedness for Caregiving Scale Score
Zeitfenster: Day 7
Family caregiver preparedness will be measured using the 8-item Preparedness for Caregiving Scale. Scores will range from 0 to 32. Higher scores indicate better preparedness for the caregiving role.
Day 7
Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale Score
Zeitfenster: Day 30
Family caregiver self-efficacy will be measured using the 8-item Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale. Scores will range from 8 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
Day 30
Caregiver Activation Measures Score
Zeitfenster: Day 60
Patient activation will be measured using the 13-item Caregiver Activation Measures. Scores will range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge, skills, and confidence for managing their health and health care.
Day 60
Visit Completion Rate
Zeitfenster: Day 14 and 30
Number of patients that completed follow-up visit
Day 14 and 30
Time to First Outpatient Follow-up
Zeitfenster: Day 14 and 30
Number of days between discharge and first outpatient follow-up visit
Day 14 and 30
Rate of Access to Community Services - Patient
Zeitfenster: Day 30 and 60
Number of patients that had screening and intervention assessment for unmet social needs.
Day 30 and 60
Rate of Access to Community Services - Caregiver
Zeitfenster: Day 30 and 60
Number of caregivers that had screening and intervention assessment for unmet social needs
Day 30 and 60
Partners at Care Transitions Measures - Adverse Events Score
Zeitfenster: Day 7 and 30
Adverse events will be measured using the 7-item Partners at Care Transitions Measures. Scores will range from 7 to 30. Higher scores indicate greater care problems and more adverse events post discharge.
Day 7 and 30
Mortality Rate
Zeitfenster: Day 60 and 180
Count of days to date of patient death
Day 60 and 180
Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-minute Protocol Score
Zeitfenster: Day 0, 60, and 180
Cognitive function (attention, orientation, language, memory, and executive function) will be measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-min protocol. Scores will range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.
Day 0, 60, and 180

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Mitarbeiter

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Thomas Houston, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Juli 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. November 2031

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. November 2031

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

16. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

16. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

22. Juni 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

22. Juni 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

16. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • IRB00145199
  • PLACER-2025C1-43844 (Andere Zuschuss-/Finanzierungsnummer: Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Pflege Übergang

Klinische Studien zur Patient-Centered Intervention

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Vietnam

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren