Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Make a Journal Feel as if it Was Mailed Back From the Future

28 février 2017 mis à jour par: Yale University

Make a Journal Feel as if it Was Mailed Back From the Future Rather Than the Past so the Reader Will be More Likely to Read and Retain Journal Content

Optimal patient care hinges on physicians remaining up to date with developing medical knowledge. With ever increasing clinical demands however, the ability of physicians to do this is compromised. While the structure of journal based reports requires the devotion of significant time to glean emerging medical findings, social media can grab an individual's attention and then direct them to external media sites, so as to obtain more specific and detailed information of emerging medical findings. If medical journals were to fully embrace social media, physicians would have a more time-cost effective means for staying up to date.

Specific aims Using the investigator's experience as editors of two medical education based blogs, the Specific Aims of this project is to determine if a combined journal and social media-based education strategy will be more likely to continuously engage physicians. The investigators will specifically test whether physicians who access a medical journal blog will have better knowledge of the information contained in a journal, measured by CME-based questions of journal articles than they would if they only received links to the journal's site.

Specifically, the investigators will randomize participants into 3 groups with all interventions done by e-mail: group 1 is the usual care group, and will receive no intervention except for a reminder every six months to take a test of journal-based Continuing Medical Education (CME) questions from 2 anesthesiology journals; group 2 will get e-mailed web links to different specific articles, including articles on which the CME questions are based, published in 2 anesthesiology journals Monday through Friday with a reminder to take the same test every six months; and group 3 will get e-mailed web links to blogs Monday through Friday based on the same specific articles as in group 2; each daily blog will focus on a specific article, including articles on which CME questions are based, the blogs will have web links to the articles on which they are based and every six months group 3 will get a reminder to take the same test. This will continue for 2 years' duration. Every six months, the investigators will assess knowledge of material contained in the two journals using CME material from the journals.

The investigators hypothesize that those participants randomized to group 3, the group that will receive web links to blogs, will stay more informed, as measured by the test score of CME-based questions. The investigators expect that both groups 1, usual care, and 2, e-mailed links to articles, will have a similar low score as the investigators found in a preliminary study of anesthesiologists who were presented with a set of journal-based CME questions.

Public Health Significance. This study will demonstrate the utility of journal based blogs as a support to physicians in their effort to remain up to date with developing medical knowledge.

Aperçu de l'étude

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Member of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
  • Must have granted ASA permission to receive email requests

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwillingness to participate in the study
  • Inability to read or write
  • Younger than 26 years of age

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Aucune intervention: No daily emails
The usual care group will receive no intervention except for a reminder every six months to take a test of journal-based CME questions from 2 anesthesiology journals
Comparateur placebo: Article email links
The email link group will get e-mailed web links to different specific articles, including articles on which the CME questions are based, published in 2 anesthesiology journals Monday through Friday with a reminder to take the same test every six months
Email links to specific articles, published in 2 journals M-Fr with a reminder to take the same test every six month
Expérimental: Blog email links
The experimental group will get e-mailed web links to blogs Monday through Friday based on the same specific articles as in group 2; each daily blog will focus on a specific article, including articles on which CME questions are based, the blogs will have web links to the articles on which they are based and every six months group 3 will get a reminder to take the same test.
Emailed web links to blog posts M-Fr based on the same articles as in Email links group; each blog post will focus on a specific article with links to the corresponding article. Every six months group 3 will get a reminder to take the same test.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
CME testing
Délai: 2 years
CME testing scores based on CME tests from 2 different anesthesiology journals
2 years

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Lance Lichtor, M.D., Yale University

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 octobre 2015

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 février 2017

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 février 2017

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

23 juillet 2015

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

23 juillet 2015

Première publication (Estimation)

24 juillet 2015

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

3 mars 2017

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 février 2017

Dernière vérification

1 février 2017

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 1506016077

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Knowledge Bases

Essais cliniques sur Article email links

3
S'abonner