Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Simulation-Free Celiac Plexus Pain Ablation Using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Cancer-Related Celiac Pain (Celiac SRS)

8 giugno 2026 aggiornato da: University Health Network, Toronto

A Prospective Pilot Clinical Trial of Simulation-Free Celiac Plexus Pain Ablation Using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Cancer-Related Celiac Pain

This is a prospective, single-arm, pilot feasibility clinical trial designed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a simulation-free adaptive radiotherapy workflow to enable single-session celiac plexus SBRT planning and delivery. In this trial, the treatment itself is non-investigational (standard-of-care celiac plexus SBRT) but the treatment workflow (simulation-free, using adaptive radiotherapy to compress treatment planning and delivery into a single session) is novel. Investigators hypothesize the successful completion of the simulation-free ART workflow through treatment delivery in the first on-table treatment attempt for at least 80% of patients.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

A standard treatment for pain caused by cancer affecting the celiac plexus (a group of nerves in the upper abdomen behind the stomach and pancreas) is a type of radiation therapy called stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). In the usual process for this type of radiation treatment, the patient would first have a special radiation planning scan called a computer tomography simulation (CTsim) to create a personalized treatment plan. The planning process usually takes 5 to 10 days, which means treatment may begin up to 2 weeks after the initial CTsim scan. Recent technology has allowed for treatment to be planned without a separate CTsim scan, called a CTsim-free workflow. In this study, investigators will use pre-existing scans (such as diagnostic imaging) to create the patient's treatment plan. On the day of treatment, the care team will use a technique called Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART) to adjust the plan based on the patient body's position and anatomy that day, allowing planning and treatment to happen in a single visit.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

5

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Luoghi di studio

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Reclutamento
        • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
        • Investigatore principale:
          • Michael Yan

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have histologically or cytologically confirmed cancer that is metastatic or unresectable, and considered appropriate per the treating physician to receive celiac plexus SBRT.
  • Age >18 years. Because no data are currently available on the use of celiac axis SBRT in subjects ≤18 years of age, children are excluded from this study.
  • Performance status: ECOG Performance status ≤ 3
  • Severe retroperitoneal pain syndrome (radiates from the lower back to the upper abdomen, belt- like distribution), intensity of at least 5 on 11-point Brief Pain Inventory (BPI, average pain) scale.
  • Subjects must have anatomical involvement of the celiac plexus on the diagnostic CT, PET/CT, or MRI. This includes: Any pancreatic cancer, any other cancer that on imaging demonstrates either gross involvement of the celiac blood vessels or celiac plexus on imaging OR haziness around the celiac blood vessels that typically implies tumor engulfment.
  • Prior chemotherapy or biological treatment is allowed, but any active oncological treatment should be stopped at least 1 week prior to radiation therapy and renewed at least 1 week following radiation therapy.
  • Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  • Subjects must have a diagnostic CT of the abdomen and pelvis, with or without contrast, acquired < 28 days prior to the study consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In ability to tolerate lying supine and still for at least 45 minutes.
  • Performance status: ECOG Performance status of 4.
  • Previous radiotherapy to the upper abdomen overlapping with the projected site of treatment.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women are excluded from this study.
  • Subjects with conditions associated with increased risk of side effects from radiation such as inflammatory bowel disease and scleroderma.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 14 days of study entry. If pregnancy test is not clinically indicated as determined by treating physician or protocol principal investigator, documentation of this exception is sufficient in lieu of a pregnancy test.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Sim-free ART workflow
Altro: Treatment plan
Simulation-free radiation treatment planning, in which pre-existing diagnostic images are used to generate a radiation treatment pre-plan (as opposed to acquiring planning-specific image sets). This will be paired with the use of online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) to refine the pre-plan to create a final plan that matches the on-table internal target and gastrointestinal anatomy observed with on-board imaging on the day of treatment. This enables single-session celiac plexus SBRT planning and delivery.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Successful treatment plan workflow of 80% of patients
Lasso di tempo: 1 year

The feasibility and safety of the simulation-free adaptive radiotherapy workflow for celiac plexus SBRT for clinical use. Feasibility defined as the successful completion of the simulation-free ART workflow through treatment delivery in the first on-table treatment attempt for at least 80% of patients.

All of the following criteria must be met to be deemed feasible:

  • Meets all priority 1 OAR constraints
  • Meets a PTV_Opt_2500 and PTV_Opt_2000 priority 2 constraints
  • Patient specific QA pass as per institutional standards
  • Patient able to tolerate treatment position for CBCT and entirety of treatment process. If a break is required and the patient is repositioned, the ART process must repeat from CBCT acquisition
  • Complete delivery of all planned monitor units
1 year

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Component time
Lasso di tempo: 1 year
Average time required for each component of the simulation-free ART workflow, including but not limited to plan generation using diagnostic imaging, pre-treatment activities (e.g., on-table patient setup/imaging, dose prediction, segmentation of daily contours, plan optimization and evaluation), and treatment delivery.
1 year
Dosimetric comparison of radiation plans
Lasso di tempo: 1 year
Dosimetric comparison of radiation plans created on traditional offline CBCT images with those created using the simulation-free ART workflow (i.e., comparison of target coverage, sparing of organs-at-risk).
1 year
Frequency of online re-adaptation
Lasso di tempo: 1 Year
Frequency of online re-adaptation within the sim-free workflow. Readaptation defined as the need to regenerate a treatment plan after an initial plan had been generated that does not satisfy treatment parameters.
1 Year
Patient satisfaction
Lasso di tempo: 1 year
Overall patient satisfaction with celiac plexus SBRT using a simulation-free, adaptive radiotherapy workflow. This will be assessed using the Radiotherapy Experience Questionnaire (RTEQ) which is a validated RT experience questionnaire that reports patient experiences with the overall treatment process by answering statements on a scale of strongly agree to strongly disagree. Given that this is a novel workflow/process, the results of the questionnaire will shed light on their overall experience.
1 year
Change in the Brief Pain Inventory pain scale
Lasso di tempo: 6 Weeks
Change in Brief Pain Inventory pain scale, where on a scale 0 is "No Pain" and 10 is "Pain as bad as you can imagine", recorded in the pain diary, 6 weeks after sim-free celiac plexus SBRT.
6 Weeks
Change in Amount of Pain Medication
Lasso di tempo: 6 weeks
Change in the amount of pain medications (Morphine equivalents) use 6 weeks after sim-free celiac plexus SBRT, recorded in the pain diary. Patients will record number of medication units taken (unit of medication is a tablet or capsule, a millilitre (mL) of liquid, a suppository, or a patch).
6 weeks
TCAE Grade 3+ Toxicity
Lasso di tempo: 6 weeks
Any CTCAE Grade 3+ Toxicity at 6 weeks related to the SBRT treatment.
6 weeks
Cost of workflow
Lasso di tempo: 1 year
The overall cost of simulation free workflow compared to select retrospective cases treated on conventional workflow. Timepoints include simulation, planning, treatment, and follow up. Components include planning, therapist, clinician.
1 year
Mean difference between diagnostic and ETHOS plans (COM)
Lasso di tempo: 1 year
Mean difference in location between diagnostic, planning, and hypersight scans at each time point for select organs at risk. These include liver, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, kidneys, small bowel, aorta, and large bowel. Rigid registration to spinal column as baseline (or aorta). Metrics will include center of mass (COM).
1 year
Mean difference between diagnostic and ETHOS plans (DTA)
Lasso di tempo: 1 year
Mean difference in location between diagnostic, planning, and hypersight scans at each time point for select organs at risk. These include liver, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, kidneys, small bowel, aorta, and large bowel. Rigid registration to spinal column as baseline (or aorta). Metrics will include distance to agreement (DTA).
1 year
Mean difference between diagnostic and ETHOS plans (ASSD)
Lasso di tempo: 1 year
Mean difference in location between diagnostic, planning, and hypersight scans at each time point for select organs at risk. These include liver, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, kidneys, small bowel, aorta, and large bowel. Rigid registration to spinal column as baseline (or aorta). Metrics will include average symmetric surface distance (ASSD).
1 year
Mean difference between diagnostic and ETHOS plans (DSC)
Lasso di tempo: 1 Year
Mean difference in location between diagnostic, planning, and hypersight scans at each time point for select organs at risk. These include liver, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, kidneys, small bowel, aorta, and large bowel. Rigid registration to spinal column as baseline (or aorta). Metrics will include dice for volume overlap (DSC).
1 Year
Mean difference between diagnostic and ETHOS plans (DVF)
Lasso di tempo: 1 Year
Mean difference in location between diagnostic, planning, and hypersight scans at each time point for select organs at risk. These include liver, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, kidneys, small bowel, aorta, and large bowel. Rigid registration to spinal column as baseline (or aorta). Metrics will include deformation vector field (DVF).
1 Year

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 giugno 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 giugno 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 giugno 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

26 maggio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

3 giugno 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

9 giugno 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

10 giugno 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

8 giugno 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 giugno 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 25-5377

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Tumore del pancreas

Prove cliniche su Treatment plan

Cerca prove simili

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

CROs by country

CROs in Iran

Condizioni

Malattie rare

Interventi farmacologici

Supplementi dietetici

Sponsor / Collaboratori

Sedi

Sottoscrivi