Study With Candida Antigen for Treatment of Warts

December 29, 2010 updated by: University of Arkansas

A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Immunologic Mechanisms Underlying Wart Resolution After Intralesional Immunotherapy With Candida Antigen

The purpose of this study is to look at how people respond to the treatment of warts through use of the Candida antigen to get an immune response to rid the body of human papillomavirus (HPV). The immune system is the part of the body that fights infections like HPV which causes warts. This research study will examine the response of your wart when injected with a portion of a common yeast (candida) which is the study drug. Your immune system response will also be looked at by doing a test called an ELISPOT assay. This test is done on blood samples. The results of this test may help us to determine how the Candida antigen affects your wart.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The use of recall antigens for treating warts is not yet Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved. The primary goal of this work was to assess the safety of Candin as an investigational new drug (IND) for the treatment of warts. In addition, clinical resolution of treated and untreated warts was evaluated and immunologic responses were examined using an ex vivo interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (IFN-γ ELISPOT) assay in order to elucidate the immunologic mechanisms behind the successful regression of warts in patients undergoing Candin injection immunotherapy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
18

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 46 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must be ages 18-50.
  • Female subjects of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test before each treatment.
  • Female subjects of child-bearing potential agree to use a reliable form of birth- control as the risks associated with candida antigens during pregnancy are not known.
  • Subjects must have two or more cutaneous, non-genital, non-facial warts.
  • Subjects must be able to provide written, informed consent.
  • Subjects must be willing to comply with the requirements of the protocol.

  • Subjects vital signs must be within the following parameters at time of enrollment:

    • Blood Pressure - <150/95 mmHg
    • Temperature - <100.4° F
    • Pulse Rate - 50 to 100 beats/minute
    • Respiratory Rate - <24 breaths/minute

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have a history of disease or treatment that has caused the subject to be immunosuppressed to include, but not limited to, cancer, HIV, or organ transplantation. Immunosuppression will be determined only by medical history.
  • Subjects who are pregnant, lactating, or attempting to become pregnant, as the risks associated with candida antigens during pregnancy are not known.
  • Subjects who have only genital or facial warts.
  • Subjects who are unable to return for follow-up visits or comply with the protocol.
  • Subjects who have a known allergy to Thimerosol or the candida antigen.
  • Subjects who have a history of asthma as determined by a medical history or treatment for an asthmatic episode.
  • Subjects who have any type of diabetes.
  • Subjects who are currently using non-selective Beta Blockers.
  • Subjects who are currently using H2 antagonists (e.g., cimetidine). There will be a 24 hour washout period for any use of H2 antagonists prior to beginning treatment in the study.
  • Subjects who have a history of keloid formation.
  • Subjects who have a history of alcohol or illicit drug abuse, as determined only by medical history.
  • Subjects who have had previous treatment with candida antigens for their warts.
  • Subjects who are currently using any other treatments for their warts. This includes prescription or over-the-counter medications. Subjects must have a wash¬out period of 30 days for any previous treatments prior to beginning the study.
  • Subjects with a blood pressure >150/95, temperature >100.4° F, pulse rate <50 or >100 beats per minute, and respiratory rate >24 at time of enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Candida Antigen
Drug: Candida Antigen
Intralesional injection of 0.3ml candida antigen into largest wart at baseline visit and then every 3 weeks +/- 3 days for a maximum of 10 treatments.
Other Names:
  • Candin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution of Injected Wart
Time Frame: Initial visit to completion of protocol, which is up to 30 weeks
When the participant completed the protocol, clinical resolution of the injected wart was determined by the overall percentage of resolution from the initial visit. Participants were classified as 'complete responders' if they had complete resolution of the injected wart, 'partial responders' if the injected wart regressed between 25% and 99%, and 'non-responders' if they had not achieved at least 25% regression of the injected wart.
Initial visit to completion of protocol, which is up to 30 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution of 1st Anatomically Distant, Non-injected Wart
Time Frame: Initial visit to completion of protocol, which is up to 30 weeks
When the participant completed the protocol, clinical resolution of 1st anatomically distant, non-injected wart was determined by the overall percentage of resolution from the initial visit.
Initial visit to completion of protocol, which is up to 30 weeks
Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution of 2nd Anatomically Distant, Non-injected Wart
Time Frame: Initial visit to completion of protocol, which is up to 30 weeks
When the participant completed the protocol, clinical resolution of 2nd anatomically distant, non-injected wart was determined by the overall percentage of resolution from the initial visit.
Initial visit to completion of protocol, which is up to 30 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Immune Response to Human Papillomavirus Type 57 (HPV-57) L1-peptide
Time Frame: Initial visit to completion of protocol, which is up to 30 weeks
Immunologic responses from peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected prior to vaccination and post-vaccination were measured by ex vivo interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (IFN-γ ELISPOT) assay to human papillomavirus type 57 L1-peptide.
Initial visit to completion of protocol, which is up to 30 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Arkansas

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Allermed Laboratories, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mayumi Nakagawa, MD, PhD, University of Arkansas

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 6, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 7, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 25, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 29, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 46487

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Warts

Clinical Trials on Candida Antigen

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings