Neurophysiological Reserve With Caffeine Manipulation

December 4, 2014 updated by: Flavio de Oliveira Pires, University of Sao Paulo

Neurophysiological Reserve: Peripheral and Central Effects of Caffeine Manipulation

The objective of this study is to verify if there is a neurophysiologic reserve when caffeine and placebo perceived as caffeine are manipulated in closed- and opened-loop exercises. Parameters of excitability level of skeletal muscle and Central Nervous System (CNS), and peripheral metabolism will be measured

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A neurophysiological reserve related to central mechanisms is supposed to be present, which should be observed when an increased central drive occurs. In theory, according to the central regulation model of effort, an increased performance could be due to the elevation on Central Nervous System excitability and activity, since exercise is not peripherally limited. Conversely, the absence of muscle performance improvement to the increased central drive promoted by caffeine would be an evidence for a peripherally localized neurophysiological limit and would indicate the absence of reserve. Therefore, if present, this reserve could be verified by using peripheral and central measures derived from electric-stimulation, evoked twitch and interpolated twitch techniques, associated to measures of EMG and peripheral metabolism, when caffeine is manipulated during closed- and opened-loop exercise.

In addition, there should also be possible to access the reserve without stimulant substance manipulation (placebo effect). By teleological argument derived from the central regulation model of effort, a neurophysiological reserve would be a natural mechanism to protect the cellular integrity. Therefore, it would be reasonable to hypothesize that, if present, a reserve would be observed by an increase in performance promoted by an elevation in central drive when placebo is perceived as caffeine. Unfortunately, however, no study utilized this experimental approach, including measures of central and peripheral activity during closed- and opened-loop exercise, to consistently respond the reserve question.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
      • São Paulo, Brazil, 05508-030
        • University of Sao Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • trained cyclists
  • trained in long distance races

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Maximum oxygen uptake lower than 55 ml/kg/min

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Caffeine
Dietary supplement: Caffeine
After ingestion of 6 mg.kg-1 of body mass of caffeine, subjects will perform the one exercise trial.
Dietary supplement: Caffeine
6 mg/kg of body mass of caffeine will be ingested by subjects before exercise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurophysiological reserve evidenced by caffeine
Time Frame: Immediately after the administration (around 10 minutes)
The time to cover a 4-km trial (closed-loop) or the time to exhaustion in an incremental intensity test (opened-loop) can show if the caffeine manipulation affects the performance. In addition, measures of CNS excitability such as EMG during the closed-loop exercise or at the exhaustion point in the opened-loop exercise, and measures such as the amplitude of H reflex, the rate of increase in H reflex/M wave relationship, can indicate if some central or peripheral alteration occurred during the exercises.
Immediately after the administration (around 10 minutes)
Neurophysiological reserve evidenced by caffeine
Time Frame: Immediately after the administration (around 10 minutes)
The time to cover a 4-km trial (closed-loop) or the time to exhaustion in an incremental intensity test (opened-loop) can show if the placebo manipulation affects the performance. In addition, measures of CNS excitability such as EMG during the closed-loop exercise or at the exhaustion point in the opened-loop exercise, and measures such as the amplitude of H reflex, the rate of increase in H reflex/M wave relationship, can indicate if some central or peripheral alteration ocurred during the exercises.
Immediately after the administration (around 10 minutes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurophysiological reserve evidenced by placebo
Time Frame: Immediately after the administration (around 10 minutes)
The placebo should also promote decrease in time of trial or increase in mean power output during a closed-loop exercise, elevation in time to exhaustion and maximal power output during an opened-loop exercise, and increase in maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and time to contraction in a target force. Also, there should be a higher CNS excitability such as: 1) higher EMG during closed-loop exercise and higher EMG at the exhaustion point in an opened-loop exercise; 2) increased amplitude of H reflex; 3) elevation on the rate of increase in H reflex/M wave relationship.
Immediately after the administration (around 10 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Sao Paulo

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Carlos Ugrinowitsch, PhD, University of Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 21, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 21, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 22, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EEFE026
  • 2010/01317-0

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Caffeine

Clinical Trials on Caffeine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings