rTMS Therapy for Primary Orthostatic Tremor
rTMS Therapy for Primary Orthostatic Tremor: A Novel Treatment Approach
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32607
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Potential participants will be diagnosed with Primary orthostatic tremor (POT) and be recruited through IRB approved database maintained by the Movement Disorders Center
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Active seizure disorder
- Significant cognitive impairment
- Presence of a metallic body such as pacemaker, implants, prosthesis,artificial limb or joint, shunt, metal rods and hearing aid
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Real rTMS Stimulation
rTMS will be delivered over each cerebellar hemisphere, using a 70mm figure-of-eight coil connected to a Magstim RapidStim2 machine while positioned 3 cm lateral to the inion on the line joining the inion and the external auditory meatus.
900 pulses will be delivered consecutively to each side with a frequency of 1 Hz and at an intensity of 90% of the resting motor threshold (RMT) for a total duration of 15 min for each cerebellar hemisphere.
The RMT will be defined as the lowest stimulation intensity required to evoke a 50 μV potential in a target muscle.
The inion will be taken as the boundary between the posterior cerebellum and the occipital cortex.
Therefore the area stimulated will be caudal to the inion to stimulate the posterior cerebellum.
|
Application of repetitious transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses using Magstim RapidStim2 to a specific brain target at predefined stimulation parameters.
All participants will receive a clinical assessment of basic mobility skills by using the TUG test.
All participants will receive a clinical assessment of walking speed by using the walk test.
All participant tremors will by analyzed using an EMG system
All participants will receive a clinical assessment of balance ability and fall risk.
All participants will have a measure of the cerebellar-brain inhibition (CBI) which will be conducted by using a TMS device determining the ability of the coil to activate the cerebellum.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS Stimulation
Patients randomized to receive sham treatment will undergo the same procedure for identifying stimulus location used in patients receiving real rTMS.
Simulated rTMS will be administered using sham Magstim RapidStim2 Placebo which produces discharge noise and vibration similar to the real coil without stimulating the cerebral cortex.
However, in addition to obvious coil discharge noise, rTMS also causes electrical stimulation of the scalp.
The investigator will simulate this experience by attaching surface electrodes underneath the sham coil and in contact with the scalp.
The investigator will use an electromyography to administer electrical shocks to the scalp simultaneous to each simulated rTMS train.
|
All participants will receive a clinical assessment of basic mobility skills by using the TUG test.
All participants will receive a clinical assessment of walking speed by using the walk test.
All participant tremors will by analyzed using an EMG system
Same procedure as real rTMS without stimulating the cerebral cortex.
All participants will receive a clinical assessment of balance ability and fall risk.
All participants will have a measure of the cerebellar-brain inhibition (CBI) which will be conducted by using a TMS device determining the ability of the coil to activate the cerebellum.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale Total Score After rTMS
Time Frame: Pre- to Post-Intervention, on average 3 hours
|
The Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale is a clinical assessment of balance ability and fall risk.
Participants complete 10 physical activity challenges while observed, and their performance is rated on a 0-4 scale, where a higher score a greater ability to balance.
Each item is then summed to generate a Total Score, ranging from 0-40, where a higher total score indicates greater overall balance and lower likelihood of fall risk.
The reported measure is the change in the FAB Total Score from before and after, where a positive value implies improvement in balance, a negative value indicates a worsening of balance, and 0 indicates no change.
|
Pre- to Post-Intervention, on average 3 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tremor electrophysiology
Time Frame: Day 1
|
POT tremors will be recorded on the surface EMG for amplitude and power spectral frequency analysis.
The investigator will use Bagnoli EMG system and Trigno wireless EMG system to record the surface EMG signals arising from muscles and the accelerometer findings respectively.Tremor amplitude and frequencies will be calculated with the surface EMG using Bagnoli system and accelerometry recorded using Trigno system.
|
Day 1
|
|
TMS measure
Time Frame: Baseline to 60 Minutes
|
Cerebellar inhibition (CBI) will be recorded which is a well-established TMS measure.
A paired pulse protocol will be used with right cerebellar stimulation as the conditioning stimulus, (cerebellar conditioning stimulus or CCS) and left motor cortex stimulation (M1) as the test stimulus (TS).
The investigator will determine the 'TS 0.5mV' which will indicate a stimulator setting (determined to the nearest 1% of the maximum stimulator output) that produces a peak-to-peak MEP amplitude of ≥0.5mV in at least five out of 10 trials.
Interstimulus intervals (ISI) of 3 to 8 milliseconds at increment of 1 millisecond will be tested.
Each run will consist of 10 trials of each of the paired stimuli (CCS-TS) and 10 trials of TS alone delivered in random order.
Inhibition trial will be expressed as a ratio of mean conditioned to mean unconditioned MEP amplitude for each subject.
|
Baseline to 60 Minutes
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Standing Duration
Time Frame: Pre- to Post-Intervention, on average 3 hours apart
|
Participants were asked to stand for as long as they could.
Their standing duration was video recorded and timed in seconds.
The measure reported is the change in standing time from before to after the rTMS intervention, where a positive value indicates an improvement in standing duration, a negative value indicates a worsening of standing duration, and 0 indicates no change.
|
Pre- to Post-Intervention, on average 3 hours apart
|
|
Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG) Test
Time Frame: Pre- to Post-Intervention
|
The TUG is a mobility test that is used to measure the basic mobility skills and gait speed of people who have neurological conditions.
It includes a sit-to-stand component as well as walking 3 m, turning, and returning to the chair.
People perform these tasks using regular footwear and customary walking aids.
The measured outcome is the time in seconds to complete the entire sequence.
For the outcome assessment the test will be videotaped and scored by a blind rater.
We calculated the change between two time points (pre intervention value minus post intervention value)
|
Pre- to Post-Intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Aparna Wagle-Shukla, M.D., Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wagle Shukla A, Vaillancourt DE. Treatment and physiology in Parkinson's disease and dystonia: using transcranial magnetic stimulation to uncover the mechanisms of action. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014 Jun;14(6):449. doi: 10.1007/s11910-014-0449-5.
- Hashimoto M, Ohtsuka K. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the posterior cerebellum during visually guided saccades in man. Brain. 1995 Oct;118 ( Pt 5):1185-93. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.5.1185.
- Cohen LG, Roth BJ, Nilsson J, Dang N, Panizza M, Bandinelli S, Friauf W, Hallett M. Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Apr;75(4):350-7. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90113-x.
- Udupa K, Chen R. Motor cortical plasticity in Parkinson's disease. Front Neurol. 2013 Sep 4;4:128. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00128.
- Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I. Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in humans. Ann Neurol. 1995 Jun;37(6):703-13. doi: 10.1002/ana.410370603.
- Stacy MA, Elble RJ, Ondo WG, Wu SC, Hulihan J; TRS study group. Assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale in essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2007 Apr 30;22(6):833-8. doi: 10.1002/mds.21412.
- Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the "get-up and go" test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Jun;67(6):387-9.
- Ugawa Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Sakai K, Furubayashi T, Machii K, Kanazawa I. Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in patients with ataxia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Sep;104(5):453-8. doi: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00051-8.
- Roth BJ, Saypol JM, Hallett M, Cohen LG. A theoretical calculation of the electric field induced in the cortex during magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Feb;81(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90103-5.
- Amassian VE, Cracco RQ, Maccabee PJ, Cracco JB. Cerebello-frontal cortical projections in humans studied with the magnetic coil. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Aug;85(4):265-72. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90115-r.
- Werhahn KJ, Taylor J, Ridding M, Meyer BU, Rothwell JC. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum on the excitability of human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Feb;101(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00213-8.
- Deuschl G, Lucking CH, Quintern J. [Orthostatic tremor: clinical aspects, pathophysiology and therapy]. EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1987 Mar;18(1):13-9. German.
- Heilman KM. Orthostatic tremor. Arch Neurol. 1984 Aug;41(8):880-1. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1984.04050190086020.
- Espay AJ, Duker AP, Chen R, Okun MS, Barrett ET, Devoto J, Zeilman P, Gartner M, Burton N, Miranda HA, Mandybur GT, Zesiewicz TA, Foote KD, Revilla FJ. Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in medically refractory orthostatic tremor: preliminary observations. Mov Disord. 2008 Dec 15;23(16):2357-62. doi: 10.1002/mds.22271.
- Guridi J, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Arbizu J, Alegre M, Prieto E, Landecho I, Manrique M, Artieda J, Obeso JA. Successful thalamic deep brain stimulation for orthostatic tremor. Mov Disord. 2008 Oct 15;23(13):1808-11. doi: 10.1002/mds.22001.
- Benito-Leon J, Rodriguez J. Orthostatic tremor with cerebellar ataxia. J Neurol. 1998 Dec;245(12):815. doi: 10.1007/s004150050294. No abstract available.
- Setta F, Jacquy J, Hildebrand J, Manto MU. Orthostatic tremor associated with cerebellar ataxia. J Neurol. 1998 May;245(5):299-302. doi: 10.1007/s004150050222. No abstract available.
- Wills AJ, Thompson PD, Findley LJ, Brooks DJ. A positron emission tomography study of primary orthostatic tremor. Neurology. 1996 Mar;46(3):747-52. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.3.747.
- Manto MU, Setta F, Legros B, Jacquy J, Godaux E. Resetting of orthostatic tremor associated with cerebellar cortical atrophy by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Arch Neurol. 1999 Dec;56(12):1497-500. doi: 10.1001/archneur.56.12.1497.
- Deuschl G, Bain P, Brin M. Consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on Tremor. Ad Hoc Scientific Committee. Mov Disord. 1998;13 Suppl 3:2-23. doi: 10.1002/mds.870131303.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB201500347
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Primary Orthostatic Tremor
-
NCT02978924CompletedPrimary Orthostatic Tremor
-
NCT05547620Active, not recruiting
-
NCT04844203RecruitingNeuropathy | Orthostatic Tremor
-
NCT07182578CompletedPostural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS)
-
NCT07163130Not yet recruitingPostural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS)
-
NCT07485998Not yet recruitingOrthostatic Hypotension | Postprandial Hypotension
-
NCT07482462RecruitingHypertension | Orthostatic Hypotension | Autonomic Dysfunction
-
NCT07585513Not yet recruitingPostural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS)
-
NCT07309666Not yet recruiting
-
NCT01285908CompletedOrthostatic Hypertension
Clinical Trials on Magstim RapidStim2
-
NCT02370875CompletedBenign Essential Blepharospasm
-
NCT00106249CompletedObsessive-Compulsive Disorder
-
NCT00567281Completed
-
NCT00529217CompletedDepersonalization Disorder
-
NCT01553240TerminatedAutism Spectrum Disorder | Pervasive Developmental Disorder | Asperger Disorder
-
NCT01548586CompletedExcitability of Diaphragmatic Primary Motor Cortex
-
NCT02619643Completed
-
NCT02479919RecruitingSocial Cognition in Patients With Schizophrenia