Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Auditory Hallucinations Original Study

September 14, 2020 updated by: Yale University

Bilateral rTMS Clinical Trial for Persistent Auditory Hallucinations Original Study

This trial is designed to determine if administering repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) simultaneously to two sites in the temporal lobes, one on the left and one on the right, produces greater improvements in "voices" and other symptoms of schizophrenia compared to rTMS given to just one site in the temporal lobes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is an extension of an ongoing clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT 00308997) that was initiated in 2006. The primary objective of the ongoing clinical trial (hereafter called the "parent trial") is to determine efficacy of rTMS in curbing auditory hallucinations when delivered to a part of the left temporal lobe called Wernicke's area and a corresponding region in the right temporal lobe. The parent trial appears to show robust effects for active rTMS compared to effects of sham stimulation. However, observed responses following active rTMS have often been incomplete. Moreover, in some cases there has been a subsequent return of symptoms 1 to 6 months after the trial ended.

We consequently have initiated a trial where patients who have participated in the parent trial and demonstrated an incomplete response or a subsequent return of symptoms may return to receive additional active rTMS. We hypothesize that efficacy of suppressive rTMS will be enhanced if directed simultaneously to right/left Wernicke's area (the site used in the parent trial) as well as to a second site located in the opposite middle temporal cortex. Roughly half of subjects in the re-enrollment will be randomized to receive active rTMS to right/left Wernicke's area plus active rTMS to opposite hemisphere middle temporal region, while half of subjects will be randomized to receive active rTMS to right/left Wernicke's area plus sham rTMS to opposite hemisphere middle temporal region. The position of the middle temporal regions will be determined by two recently completed brain imaging studies of auditory hallucinations suggesting that activation in these sites triggers auditory hallucinations. The two-position design will allow us to determine if active rTMS delivered to the middle temporal cortex is superior in amplifying efficacy of active rTMS targeting Wernicke's area and in reducing auditory hallucinations to sham stimulation to the same site. The re-enrollment protocol will utilize two rTMS devices simultaneously where one directly triggers the other.

This study record has been amended to remove a third arm that was added in 2012. The third arm described was not actually a comparative arm, but rather an added objective with a different study population. Dr. Ralph Hoffman unexpectedly passed away while this study was being conducted. This study has been submitted as a separate study (NCT04548622) where the summarized study results of the terminated study will be presented.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06519
        • Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previously enrolled in our "parent" rTMS trial with passage of at least six months since last received active rTMS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active substance abuse or alcohol abuse
  • Pregnancy
  • Dose or type of psychiatric medication changed within the 4 weeks prior to study entry
  • Recent head trauma, seizures, or significant unstable medical condition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Active bilateral rTMS to left/right Wernicke's area and opposite side middle temporal gyrus
Week 1 treatment includes rTMS for 5 sessions to either to left or right Wernicke's area (BA22) synchronous with rTMS to opposite hemisphere middle temporal cortex (BA21). Week 2 treatment includes rTMS given for 5 sessions with positions reversed (e.g., if Wernicke's stimulation was on the left during Week 1, position of rTMS will switch to the right side during Week 2 and vice-versa). As in Week 1, active rTMS will also be given synchronously to the opposite hemisphere middle temporal cortex. Weeks 3 and 4 include 10 stimulation sessions to the configuration of sites producing greater improvement in comparing results of Week 1 and Week 2. rTMS for each stimulation session will be given at 1-Hertz (once per second) for 16 minutes without interruption.
Active Comparator: 2
Active rTMS to left/right Wernicke's region plus sham rTMS to opposite hemisphere middle temporal cortex
Week 1 includes repetitive rTMS for 5 sessions to either to left or right Wernicke's area (BA22) synchronous with sham rTMS to opposite hemisphere middle temporal cortex (BA21). Week 2 includes rTMS given for 5 sessions with positions reversed (e.g., if Wernicke's stimulation was on the left during Week 1, position of rTMS will switch to the right side during Week 2 and vice-versa). As in Week 1, sham rTMS will also be given synchronously to the opposite hemisphere middle temporal cortex. Weeks 3 and 4 include 10 stimulation sessions to the configuration of sites producing greater improvement in comparing results of Week 1 and Week 2. rTMS for each stimulation session will be given at 1-Hertz (once per second) for 16 minutes without interruption.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Hallucination change score
Time Frame: Measured at every week over a total 4 weeks
Measured at every week over a total 4 weeks
Clinical Global Improvement Scale
Time Frame: Measured at every week over a total of 4 weeks
Measured at every week over a total of 4 weeks
Frequency subscale of Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks
Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Summed scores of Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks
Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks
PANSS composite positive symptoms scale
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks
Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks
PANSS composite negative symptom scale
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks
Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks
PANSS total score
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks
Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks
Measured at baseline and every week over a total of 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ralph Hoffman, MD, Yale University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Magstim Rapid 2 system triggering Magstim Super Rapid system

3
Subscribe