Targeted Food Elimination for Treatment of Functional Gastrointestinal Diseases in Children (FGID)

September 29, 2017 updated by: Lawson Health Research Institute

Randomized Controlled Trial of Food Elimination Based on IgG Antibodies for Treatment of Functional Gastrointestinal Diseases (FGIDs) in Children

Recurrent Abdominal Pain (RAP) in children is common and causes significant functional impairment and poor quality of life. Lifestyle factors such as diet, anxiety, and stress are important triggers of abdominal pains, but there is lack of high quality research evidence on optimal treatment modalities in children. This study aims to evaluate the effect of food elimination on abdominal pain frequency and severity in a cohort of children with abdominal pain associated Functional Gastrointestinal Diseases (FGID). The primary outcome will be a comparison of abdominal pain frequency and severity between standard therapy and targeted food elimination, based on IgG antibody results to a multiple food antigen panel. The investigators anticipate that 'targeted dietary elimination' as a treatment strategy will resolve abdominal pain and improve quality of life in children.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Randomized controlled single center trial. Setting: Outpatient pediatric gastroenterology (PG) clinic, Children's Hospital, London, Canada. Methodology: After a 4 week run in period, 60 children aged 5-18 years, meeting Rome 3 inclusion criteria for abdominal pain associated FGID will be recruited to the trial. After informed consent, the participants will be randomized to either a standard treatment or lifestyle modification (dietary elimination) group in the ratio of 1:1. IgG testing to food antigens will be completed in both groups using a commercially available specific IgG ELISA-based multiple food allergen panel but will ONLY be disclosed for the lifestyle modification group. The patient will receive specific advice by a dietitian to exclude a maximum of two food items from his/her diet for 4 weeks. Children will be followed-up in PG clinic at 4-weekly intervals for 16 weeks. At every clinic visit, Diary of food intake, Abdominal Pain Index (API) and Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire will be completed by both child and parent. The standard therapy group will receive conventional treatment for Abdominal Pain (AP) as per usual practice at the PG Clinic. Response is defined as more than 50% improvement in frequency and severity of abdominal pain. At each follow up visit, non-responders will cross over to the other arm of the study. At the end of the trial, non-responders in either group will continue to receive conventional treatment in the PG Clinic. Responders will be discharged back to their family physicians. Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22.0.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children 5-18 years of age with a diagnosis of Abdominal Pain-related FGIDs (Functional Abdominal Pain , FAP syndrome, Functional Dyspepsia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Abdominal Migraine) as defined by the Rome 3 criteria.
  2. Acquisition of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Children less than 5 years of age
  2. Organic cause of abdominal pain established by investigations (e.g. Crohn's disease)
  3. Diagnosis of failure-to-thrive or co-morbid chronic physical disease (e.g., Diabetes)
  4. Any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator would be unsafe for trial participation.
  5. Lack of follow-up or failure to comply with study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Lifestyle Modification/Dietary Exclusion
In the lifestyle modification group, where specific IgG antibodies to foods are identified, the intervention is appropriate dietary elimination. The IgG antibody results will be disclosed and specific dietary elimination advice will be provided by an experienced dietician; provide diet alternatives to prevent nutritional deficiencies and improve adherence to diet. To improve compliance, a maximum of 2 high IgG positive foods will be eliminated at any one time in each 4 week period. Children will be followed-up in PG clinic at 4-weekly intervals for 16 weeks. Response is defined as more than 50% improvement in frequency and severity of abdominal pain. They will be assessed at visits 2, 3, 4 and 5 for follow-up, and non-responders, will cross over to the other arm of the study.
Other: Dietary Exclusion
The IgG antibody results will be disclosed ONLY to the patients in the lifestyle modification group by phone approximately one week after clinic visit.. 'Dietary Exclusion' will be advised by a dietitian. Patients are advised to eliminate a maximum of two foods as identified by high IgG antibody titres.
Other: The Standard Treatment Group
The standard therapy group will not receive results of IgG antibody testing. The patients will receive conventional treatment for Abdominal Pain as per usual practice at the Pediatric GI (PG) Clinic - counseling, reassurance, improving coping strategies and pain relief as appropriate. Children will be followed-up in PG clinic at 4-weekly intervals for 16 weeks. Response is defined as more than 50% improvement in frequency and severity of abdominal pain. They will be assessed at visits 2, 3, 4 and 5 for follow-up, and non-responders, will cross over to the other arm of the study.
Other: Standard Treatment
The standard therapy group will receive conventional treatment for Abdominal Pain as per usual practice at the Pediatric GI (PG) Clinic - counseling, reassurance, improving coping strategies and pain relievers as appropriate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abdominal Pain Index: Child Form and Parent Proxy Form
Time Frame: 4 week run in period to Visit 5 (Week 16)
Primary Outcome: The Abdominal Pain (AP) frequency and severity is calculated in each clinic visit using a 4 point questionnaire - the validated Abdominal Pain Index (API): Child Form and Parent Proxy form for age range 8 to 18 years. For age range 5 to 7 years, only the Abdominal Pain Index: Parent proxy form will be used. The 4 point scale measures the frequency of abdominal pain (Scores range 0-none to 5-every day and constant), duration of abdominal pain (scores range 0-no pain to 5-all day) and severity of abdominal pain (scores range from 0-no pain to 10-most pain). Improvement in AP is defined as >50% reduction in frequency and severity of AP in food elimination and standard treatment groups.
4 week run in period to Visit 5 (Week 16)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
KINDL Questionnaire for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents
Time Frame: 4 week run in period to Visit 5 (Week 16)
The KINDL Questionnaire: self report and parent proxy versions will be used for different age groups. The KINDL questionnaire consists of 24 Likert-scaled items associated with six dimensions:physical well-being, emotional well-being, self-esteem, family, friends and everyday functioning (school or nursery school/kindergarten). The sub-scales of these six dimensions can be combined to produce a total score.
4 week run in period to Visit 5 (Week 16)
Patient Compliance
Time Frame: 4 week run in period to Visit 5 (Week 16)
Compliance with dietary exclusion in dietary exclusion group at visits 3, 4 and 5. Compliance with conventional treatment in standard group at visits 3, 4 and 5. Adherence to advice and treatment will be measured by clinician impression at visits in both groups. (measured by consistency of completion of diaries and patient reporting of adherence to medical advice).
4 week run in period to Visit 5 (Week 16)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Lawson Health Research Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Western Ontario, Canada

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dhandapani Ashok, MD, Children's Hospital of Western Ontario

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 3, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 29, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 106580

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Clinical Trials on Dietary Exclusion

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings