Dosage and Efficacy of Probucol-induced apoE to Negate Cognitive Deterioration (DEPEND)

January 30, 2018 updated by: John C. S. Breitner, Douglas Mental Health University Institute

Dose-finding and Proof-of-concept Trial of Probucol to Increase Availability of CSF Apolipoprotein-E

DEPEND is an open-label but dosage-masked trial of the retired cholesterol-lowering drug probucol as an agent to increase availability of apolipoprotein E (apoE) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of cognitively intact older persons at risk of Alzheimer's dementia. Absorption of oral probucol is variable. In a sample of 23 cognitively intact persons over age 55, DEPEND will therefore develop an algorithm to prescribe individualized dosing to achieve plasma concentration that will likely increase availability of CSF apoE. These persons will then use their individualized dosage for 12 months to assess longer-term effects of the drug on CSF apoE concentration, while monitoring closely for evidence of adverse consequences of use.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Probucol is a cholesterol-lowering drug that has been removed from the market in Canada and the US, but remains in clinical use in Asia. In rodents, probucol increases synthesis and availability of apolipoprotein E (apoE) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). ApoE is the protein product of the polymorphic gene APOE, allelic variation in which remains the strongest known risk factor (other than age itself) for Alzheimer's dementia. Oral Probucol is absorbed variably. Administration of a single, fixed dose therefore results in a wide range of plasma concentrations when the drug is given to various individuals in a fixed dosage. Limited human data suggest that higher plasma and CSF concentrations of probucol result in stronger increases in CSF apoE concentration. The dual aims of DEPEND are therefore 1) to develop an individualized dosing regimen that will result in plasma concentrations that are likely to increase CSF apoE concentration by 50%; and 2) to treat 20 persons at elevated risk of Alzheimer's dementia, each at his/her ideal individual dosage, for 12 months, observing the resulting change in CSF concentrations of apoE. Simultaneously, subjects will be observed carefully for evidence of any treatment effects on cognition or other probable markers of progression in pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease, as well as safety risks that might deter further human experimentation with the drug.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
23

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4H1R3
        • Douglas Hospital Research Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Family history of one or more parents or multiple siblings who developed Alzheimer-like dementia, as established by review of history and/or medical records, and by responses to a brief questionnaire describing characteristics of the relatives' condition
  • Aged 60+. May be aged 55-59 only if at least one parent or sibling experienced onset of Alzheimer's dementia at an age no more than 15 years beyond the prospective participant's current age
  • At least six years of formal education
  • Sufficient fluency in spoken and written English and/or French to participate in study visits and in psychometric testing
  • A collateral respondent available to provide information on the cognitive and health status of the participant, and to assist with monitoring of study interventions, if needed
  • Willingness to undergo four lumbar punctures for collection of CSF
  • Affirmation of prior informed consent to undergo genetic testing for APOE and other known or suspected AD risk factors
  • Ability and intention to participate in study visits per protocol, in the opinion of a study physician
  • Willingness to limit use of over-the-counter or prescription medicines (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, anti-histamines) known to prolong QTc interval, or to potentiate the tendency of probucol to prolong this interval, in the opinion of a study physician
  • If on a statin or other lipid lowering drug that, in the opinion of a study physician, can safely be co-administered with probucol, willingness to remain on a stable dose of this medication during the entire trial period.
  • Provision of informed consent for this trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or identified cognitive disorder diagnosed previously by a physician, psychologist, nurse-clinician, or other health care provider, or by StoP-AD staff
  • Past or present use of a commercially available acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitor including tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine, or galantamine
  • Past or present use of memantine or other approved cognitive enhancement prescription agent
  • History of heart disease, myocardial infarction or documented acute coronary syndrome, or arrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation)
  • Corrected QT interval using Bazett's formula (QTcB) interval > 450 msec for males or 470 msec for females as detected by EKG and confirmed by consultant cardiologist
  • Clinically significant hypertension, anemia, liver disease, or kidney disease, in opinion of a study physician (participants with treated hypertension who are normotensive as a result of intervention may be enrolled.)
  • Concurrent use of over-the-counter or prescription medicines (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, anti-histamines) known to prolong QTc interval, or to potentiate the tendency of probucol to prolong this interval, in the opinion of a study physician
  • Any inflammatory or chronic pain condition that necessitates regular use of opiates (e.g., oxycodone, hydrocodone, tramadol, meperidine, hydromorphone), or NSAIDs (more than 4 doses / week)
  • Current plasma creatinine > 132 mmol/l (1.5 mg/dl)
  • Current alcohol, barbiturate or benzodiazepine abuse or dependence (in opinion of study physician)
  • Any other medical condition that, in the opinion of a study physician, makes it inadvisable for the participant to be assigned to regular dosage of probucol
  • Enrolment in any trial or experimental protocol that, in the opinion of a study physician, is likely to interfere with PREVENT-AD or any of its derivative protocols including this one
  • Any other condition that, in the opinion of a study physician, makes it medically inappropriate for the participant to enroll in the program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Single arm
All subjects will receive probucol, starting with a fixed dose of 600 mg daily following the evening meal. The variable plasma concentrations achieved and the resulting modification in concentration of CSF apoE will suggest an ideal range of plasma concentrations for use of the drug as an inducer of increased availability of apoE in the CSF. The known dose-proportionality of the drug in plasma will then be used to estimate an ideal individualized dose for each participant. The effects of such individualized dosage will be tested over 1 year of follow-up observations, searching for treatment effects on CSF apoE and for evidence of other treatment effects, particularly including adverse effects.
Drug: Probucol
Probucol was used with good effect for more than a decade in Canada and the US to reduce plasma cholesterol. Although withdrawn from the Canadian and US markets by its manufacturer for commercial reasons, it is still widely used for this purpose in Japan and Korea. Over the past decade, long-term follow-up studies in Asian populations at high risk of cardiovascular events have shown that the drug reduces the incidence of these events in a manner not unlike "statin" drugs used widely in Canada and the US.
Other Names:
  • Lorelco (trade name in Japan)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plasma concentration of probucol following test dose
Time Frame: three months
Participants are given a test dose of probucol 600 mg q.d. Plasma concentration of probucol and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of probucol and apolipoprotein E (apoE) are measured at baseline and after 3 months. Results should suggest a range of plasma concentrations associated with an increase in CSF apoE by at least 50%. Relying on dose-proportionality of plasma concentration achieved, an estimated optimum individual dose for target levels of apolipoprotein E induction is then calculated.
three months
Apolipoprotein concentration in CSF before and after treatment with probucol at individualized dose
Time Frame: One year on individualized dosing, as suggested by experimental observations above
After a washout period => 2 months, participants will initiate treatment with probucol at individualized dosage determined in Outcome 1. Results after 1 year will establish whether such individualized dosage of probucol achieves 'target engagement' of specified increase in CSF apoE, to be tested subsequently for its ability to prevent progression of pre-symptomatic Alzheimer disease.
One year on individualized dosing, as suggested by experimental observations above

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Douglas Mental Health University Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
McGill University
Weston Brain Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: John C Breitner, MD, MPH, Douglas Hospital Research Centre & McGill University Faculty of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 31, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 30, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DEPEND

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Will share de-identified data upon completion and publication of trial

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Trials on Probucol

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings