Quality of Life Measurement in Treatment Naïve Patients With Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 1 (GT1) Suffering From Fatigue and Receiving Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, and Ritonavir and Dasabuvir (Viekirax®/Exviera®) (HEMATITE)

September 30, 2019 updated by: AbbVie

Quality of Life Measurement Using Wrist Actigraphy in HCV Genotype 1 Infected, Treatment naïve Patients Suffering From Fatigue and Receiving Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, and Ritonavir Tablets and Dasabuvir Tablets (Viekirax®/Exviera®; 3D Regimen): The HEMATITE Study

This is an observational, prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, real-life study designed to observe the impact of paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir with dasabuvir regimen (Viekirax®/Exviera®, 3D regimen) on total daytime physical activity and fatigue in participants with HCV GT1.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
41

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Inselspital, Universitaetsklin
      • Lugano, Switzerland, 6900
        • Fondazione Epatocentro Ticino
      • Neuchatel, Switzerland, CH-2000
        • Hôpital Neuchâtelois
      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Universitaetsspital Zuerich
    • Sankt Gallen
      • St. Gallen, Sankt Gallen, Switzerland, 9007
        • Kantonsspital St. Gallen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with CHC, genotype 1, receiving paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir with dasabuvir regimen (3D regimen)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment-naïve participants
  • Mono-infected participants with chronic HCV GT1
  • Non-cirrhotic participants
  • Participants with debilitating fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS] greater than or equal to 4)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with sources of fatigue other than HCV (especially, severe depression, cancer and hormonal disorders causing clinically significant fatigue)
  • Participants with conditions that do not allow to adhere to protocol and use of the device at investigator's discretion
  • Participants who are wheelchair dependent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
HCV Genotype 1 Participants
Participants receiving paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir with dasabuvir (Viekirax®/Exviera®, 3D regimen)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline at Day 168 in Mean Daytime Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 168
Mean daytime physical activity for 2 eligible weeks (10 working days) prior to the assessment day was derived from a wrist-worn activity tracker (ActiGraph GT9X Link), which measures activity via a 3-axis algorithm. For total daytime physical activity, the measured counts of the activity tracker data minus total sleep counts were used as day-counts. Higher day-counts signify more activity.
Baseline, Day 168

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Over Time in Mean Daytime Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
Mean daytime physical activity for 2 eligible weeks (10 working days) prior to the assessment day was derived from a wrist-worn activity tracker (ActiGraph GT9X Link), which measures activity via a 3-axis algorithm. For total daytime physical activity, the measured counts of the activity tracker data minus total sleep counts were used as day-counts. Higher day-counts signify more activity.
Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
Change From Baseline Over Time in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
The FSS is a 9-item questionnaire assessing the functional impact of fatigue during the past two weeks on multiple life domains using scales from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The fatigue score is the mean score of the 9 items, with lower scores indicating less fatigue severity. Clinically significant fatigue is usually defined as score equal or above 4. Changes were calculated by the formula "Baseline minus Day 28, Day 84, or Day 168." Therefore the resulting negative values reflect deterioration and resulting positive values reflect improvement.
Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
Change From Baseline Over Time in Sleep Efficiency
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
Sleep efficiency for 2 eligible weeks (10 working days) prior to the assessment day was derived from a wrist-worn activity tracker (ActiGraph GT9X Link). Sleep efficiency was defined as the percent of time scored as sleep during the sleep period, from 0% to 100%. Changes were calculated by the formula "Baseline minus Day 28, Day 84, or Day 168." Therefore the resulting negative values reflect deterioration and resulting positive values reflect improvement.
Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
Correlation Coefficients of FSS and Mean Daytime Physical Activity: sdITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
The relationship between the parameters FSS and mean total daytime physical activity as well as for the changes of these parameters between baseline and follow-up visits was analyzed. Given a lake of normal distribution for the FSS data Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated.
Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
Correlation Coefficients of FSS and Mean Daytime Physical Activity: mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
The relationship between the parameters FSS and mean total daytime physical activity as well as for the changes of these parameters between baseline and follow-up visits was analyzed. Given a lake of normal distribution for the FSS data Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated.
Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
Correlation Coefficients of Change From Baseline Over Time in FSS and Mean Daytime Physical Activity: sdITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
The relationship between the parameters FSS and mean total daytime physical activity as well as for the changes of these parameters between baseline and follow-up visits was analyzed. Given a lake of normal distribution for the FSS data Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated.
Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
Correlation Coefficients of Change From Baseline Over Time in FSS and Mean Daytime Physical Activity: mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
The relationship between the parameters FSS and mean total daytime physical activity as well as for the changes of these parameters between baseline and follow-up visits was analyzed. Given a lake of normal distribution for the FSS data Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated.
Baseline, Days 28, 84, 168
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks (SVR12) Post-Treatment
Time Frame: Day 168 (or 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug)
SVR12 defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) not detectable 12 weeks after the last actual dose of paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir with dasabuvir regimen (Viekirax®/Exviera®, 3D regimen).
Day 168 (or 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AbbVie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 25, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 25, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 21, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P16-272

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings