Groups for Regaining Our Wellbeing (GROW)

February 23, 2024 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Evaluation of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Gulf War Illness

This study is a randomized clinical trial measuring outcomes up to 6-months post-intervention. The objective of this study is to evaluate outcomes of two different group interventions for Veterans with Chronic Multisymptom Illness (CMI). The interventions to be compared are Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and an adapted version of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (aCDSMP) for Veterans experiencing symptoms of Chronic Multi-Symptom Illness (CMI) - musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, and cognitive failures - especially those who were deployed to Gulf War I. Hypothesis One (re: Outcomes): Participants randomized to the adapted Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (aCDSMP) will derive benefit for the primary outcomes, but with smaller effects than the participants randomized to Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR). The investigators hypothesize that Veterans randomized to MBSR will report greater reductions in each of the three primary outcome measures (pain, fatigue, and cognitive failures) at 6-month follow-up as compared to aCDSMP. Hypothesis Two (re: Acceptability): MBSR will be an acceptable and satisfactory program for Veterans with CMI, as measured by attendance rates, a self-report measure of satisfaction, and qualitative interviews. The investigators hypothesize that Veterans with CMI randomized to MBSR will report greater satisfaction with care than their peers randomized to aCDSMP.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators will enroll 308 participants. Half of these will be Gulf War Veterans who meet criteria for CMI, and the other half will be Veterans from other periods of service who also meet criteria for CMI. Each participant will be randomized to either participate in MBSR or aCDSMP (stratified by Gulf War deployment status so there are ~7-8 Gulf War Veterans in each group for every cohort). Measures to collect primary outcome data (pain, fatigue, cognitive failures, patient satisfaction), secondary outcomes, and potential mediators will be administered at four assessments: (1) Baseline; (2) Post-Intervention; (3) at 3-months after the group ended; and (4) at 6-months after the group ended. Sample demographic data (age, gender, race, income, education, etc.) will be collected at baseline only. All study procedures will take place at VA Puget Sound Health Care System in Seattle, WA.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
245

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
        • VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-report all the criteria for Chronic Multi-Symptom Illness
  • Fluent in English and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently drinking with past-year history of alcohol-related seizures or delirium tremens
  • Current DMS-V substance use disorder other than cannabis or nicotine
  • Moderate or high risk of suicide as assessed with MINI
  • Current psychotic disorder
  • Current manic episode
  • Diagnosis of borderline personality disorder or antisocial personality disorder
  • Inpatient admittance for psychiatric reasons in the past month
  • Prior participation in MBSR or CDSMP (attended at least one session)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction
An 8-week standardized group program to teach mindfulness skills. In MBSR, participants meet for 2.5 hours per week for 8 weeks in a group format. Participants receive instruction in mindfulness meditation according to a standardized curriculum and have the opportunity to ask questions.
Behavioral: Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction
An 8-week standardized group program to teach mindfulness skills. In MBSR, participants meet for 2.5 hours per week for 8 weeks in a group format. Participants receive instruction in mindfulness meditation according to a standardized curriculum and have the opportunity to ask questions.
Other Names:
  • MBSR
Active Comparator: Chronic Disease Self-Management Program
The CDSMP is a structured program to teach self-management skills based on self-efficacy theory. CDSMP teaches self-management strategies and attempts to modify illness beliefs, enhance self-management capabilities and reinforce successful management strategies. CDSMP is based on self-efficacy theory, which posits that key determinants of behavior are: 1). self-efficacy (confidence in the ability to carry out an action) and 2). outcome expectancy (expectation that a particular goal will be achieved).
Behavioral: Chronic Disease Self-Management Program
The CDSMP is a structured program to teach self-management skills based on self-efficacy theory. CDSMP teaches self-management strategies and attempts to modify illness beliefs, enhance self-management capabilities and reinforce successful management strategies. CDSMP is based on self-efficacy theory, which posits that key determinants of behavior are: 1). self-efficacy (confidence in the ability to carry out an action) and 2). outcome expectancy (expectation that a particular goal will be achieved).
Other Names:
  • CDSMP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) Total Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
A validated measure of pain, minimum value: 0, maximum value: 222, higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
General Fatigue Subscale of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
A measure of general fatigue symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 80, higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
A measure of concentration and memory disturbances. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 100, higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time Frame: report at post-intervention assessment, 3-4 months after baseline
A measure of satisfaction with the interventions. Minimum value: 8, maximum value: 32, higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
report at post-intervention assessment, 3-4 months after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
A measure of depression. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 27, higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
PTSD Checklist - Civilian Version (PCL-C)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
A measure of PTSD. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 80. Higher score indicates worse outcome.
Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
SF-12, Standard (Mental and Physical Component Summary Scores)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
A measure of functional status and wellbeing. Two scores generated: a mental component score (MCS) and a physical component score (PCS). For each measure: minimum value: 0, maximum value: 100. Lower score indicates worse outcome.
Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
NIH Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information System (PROMIS) for Alcohol Negative Consequences, Short Form
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention
Substance Use Disorder (SUD) symptom severity for alcohol. Minimum score: 0, maximum score: 35. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Change from baseline to 6 months after completing the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
VA Office of Research and Development

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tracy L Simpson, PhD, VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 8, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SDR 15-197

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

A de-identified, anonymized dataset will be created and shared. Only de-identified data, with no individually identifiable patient information, will be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings