Outpatient Treatment of Uncomplicated Diverticulitis With Either Antibiotic or Nonantibiotic Treatment (MUD)

August 17, 2022 updated by: Dr. Marylise Boutros, Jewish General Hospital

Study on Outpatient Treatment of Uncomplicated Diverticulitis With Either Antibiotic or Nonantibiotic Treatment: a Randomized Pilot Trial

Uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis is a common disease in Western countries. Traditional management includes inpatient administration of either oral or intravenous antibiotics with resumption of oral intake as symptoms improve. Recent literature has however questioned both inpatient and antibiotic treatment. Indeed, both inpatient and antibiotic treatment are associated with non-negligible risks to patients. The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial designed to determine whether nonantibiotic treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis is safe in the outpatient setting.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis is a common disease in Western countries. Traditional management includes inpatient administration of either oral or intravenous antibiotics with resumption of oral intake as symptoms improve. Recent literature has however questioned both inpatient and antibiotic treatment. Indeed, both inpatient and antibiotic treatment are associated with non-negligible risks to patients. The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial designed to determine whether nonantibiotic treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis is safe in the outpatient setting. It is designed as a pilot non-inferiority blinded randomized controlled trial. The estimated length of this pilot trial is 1 year. The target population is capable adults of who have a CT-diagnosed episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis who present to the Jewish General Hospital Emergency room.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
        • Jewish General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 and < 90 years old
  2. Capable of giving informed consent
  3. Lower abdominal pain and/or tenderness
  4. Confirmed affection of left colon, including descending and sigmoid colon
  5. Confirmed episode of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis on computed tomography (CT) scan defined as wall edema with or without fat stranding. Limited pericolic air with bubbles less than 5 mm in size, and less than 5cm from the colon wall, will be included as uncomplicated diverticulitis. Scan must be performed prior to enrollment and assessment for illegibility. The initial scan is not a study-specific procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. CT scan shows complicated diverticulitis as defined by the presence of intraperitoneal free perforation (i.e. intraperitoneal contrast extravasation if intra-rectal contrast given, free air under diaphragms, disseminated intraperitoneal air), abscess, obstruction, fistulisation, and phlegmon.
  2. Suspicion of colorectal cancer on CT scan
  3. Immunosuppression (including but not exclusively insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, chronic liver disease, ongoing chemotherapy, chronic renal failure with hemodialysis, corticosteroid and immunosuppressive medication)
  4. Pregnancy and breastfeeding
  5. Any comorbid infection requiring
  6. High fever (≥ 38.5 ºC)
  7. Significant leukocytosis (> 15 g/dL)
  8. Abdominal pain worsening in the emergency, impeding ambulation and/or eating
  9. Evidence of generalized peritonitis on physical exam
  10. Intolerance to oral intake and/or persistent vomiting
  11. Marked abdominal distension and/or signs of ileus on CT scan
  12. Noncompliance/unreliability for return visits/lack of support system
  13. Failed outpatient treatment not previously included in study within last 30 days
  14. Cognitive, social or psychiatric impairment
  15. For patients aged 65 years or older, a Charlson Comorbidity Score ≥ 5 as calculated on the following website: https://www.thecalculator.co/health/Charlson-Comorbidity-Index-(CCI)-Calculator-765.html 19-20.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Outpatient nonantibiotic treatment
Other: Nonantibiotic treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis
Patients randomized to this arm will be treated without antibiotics in the outpatient setting. Pain will be managed with appropriate analgesia as per protocol.
Active Comparator: Outpatient antibiotic treatment
Other: Antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis
Patients randomized to this arm will be treated with antibiotics in the outpatient setting. Pain will be managed with appropriate analgesia as per protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants' retention rate as assessed by the number of participants retained in the study from screening to the end of follow-up.
Time Frame: 1 year
The primary outcome pertains to the feasibility of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. The study group's main concern is that accrual will be impeded by the important change in clinical management that nonantibiotic treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis requires. Also, the study group is concerned that patients may be lost to follow-up. For these reasons, the primary outcome is the retention rate of patients from screening to the end of follow-up. The rate will be calculated according to (1) the proportion of participants screened but not randomized, and (2) the proportion of participants lost to follow-up.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment failure
Time Frame: 1 year
Treatment failure is defined as persistence, increase or recurrence of abdominal pain and/or fever, inflammatory bowel obstruction, need for radiological abscess drainage or immediate surgery due to complicated diverticulitis, need for hospital admission, and mortality during the first 60 days after discharge.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jewish General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CODIM-MBM-17-020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uncomplicated Diverticular Disease

Clinical Trials on Nonantibiotic treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings