Analysis of a Tapered Porous Coated Stem and a Cementless Hemispherical Acetabular Component

November 19, 2024 updated by: Medacta USA

Prospective, Multicenter Study to Assess Performance of a Tapered Porous Coated Stem and a Cementless Hemispherical Acetabular Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty

This prospective study will evaluate the hip function and quality of life of patients operated for total hip arthroplasty with Masterloc femoral stem and MPACT acetabular cup. The results of this study will establish the performance of Masterloc femoral component (Medacta International SA) and MPACT acetabular component (Medacta International SA), and provide a general estimate of survivorship, clinical effectiveness and complications.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Oro Valley, Arizona, United States, 85755
        • Tucson Othropedic Institute
    • Utah
      • West Jordan, Utah, United States, 84088
        • Jordan Valley Medical Center of Orthopedics Rehabilitation and Excellence
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99218
        • Spokane Joint Replacement Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing surgery as part of routine care.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary osteoarthritis of the hip necessitating primary hip replacement,
  • Suitability for straight cementless stem,
  • Adult male and female under 75 years old,
  • Ability to give informed consent ,
  • Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing to participate for the length of the prescribed follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Off-label use of the Medacta Masterloc femoral component and MPACT acetabular component
  • Post-traumatic deformity in the affected hip,
  • Patient suffering from Inflammatory arthritis including rheumatoid arthritis,
  • Patient suffering by congenital or developmental deformity,
  • Severe osteoporosis,
  • History of surgery in the affected hip,
  • Perioperative fracture,
  • Personality disorders (dementia, alcohol or drug abuse etc) suspected of making completion of the trial uncertain,
  • Patients with a history of active infection
  • Pregnant women or those seeking to become pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Femoral Component:Medacta Masterloc Stem and Medacta MPACT cup
All patients enrolled will receive the Medacta Masterloc Stem and MPACT cup with Highcross PE liner.
Device: Femoral Component:Medacta Masterloc Stem and Medacta MPACT cup.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most commonly performed and successful orthopaedic operations in improving a patient's quality of life. Orthopaedic surgeons are continually striving to improve all aspects of care relating to this procedure whether this is improvements in implant technology, instrument improvement, or the technique involved in performing the procedure.The results of this study will establish the performance of the femoral component and acetabular component, and provide a general estimate of survivorship, clinical effectiveness and complications.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Time Frame: pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.
Assessment of the improvement of clinical outcomes following total hip replacement using the Harris Hip Score
pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
Time Frame: pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.
Assessment of the improvement in activity levels following total hip replacement using the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.
Oxford Hip Score (OHS)
Time Frame: pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.
Assessment of the improvement in the patients physical level of activity using the Oxford Hip Score
pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.
Veterans Rand 12 (VR-12)
Time Frame: pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.
Assessment of the improvement in your health using the Veterans Rand 12
pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.
EuroQol 5 dimension (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.
Assessment of the improvement in quality of life and joint movement using the EQ-5D
pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic analysis
Time Frame: pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of osteolysis, radiolucent lines, bone hypertrophy, component migration, heterotopic ossification, resorption of calcar.
pre-operative, 4-8 weeks post-operative, 4-8 months post-operative, 9-15 months post operative, 18-30 months post-operative, 4-6 years post-operative, 9-11 years post-operative.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medacta USA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 25, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 13, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 19, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MUSA-H-ML-001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Hip

Clinical Trials on Femoral Component:Medacta Masterloc Stem and Medacta MPACT cup.

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings