Effect of Medical Marijuana on Neurocognition and Escalation of Use (MMNE)

February 8, 2023 updated by: Jodi Gilman, Massachusetts General Hospital
This study will use a randomized controlled design to test whether patients who use medical marijuana, compared to a waitlist control group, experience a change in health outcomes (relief of symptoms, or adverse health outcomes such as new-onset symptoms of cannabis use disorders, neurocognitive impairments) or brain-based changes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This trial is a randomized, longitudinal study of medical marijuana (MM) that will: (1) characterize the impact of MM on indices of addiction, such as CUD, escalation of use, tolerance, and withdrawal among those who stop using, (2) assess, via dosing diaries, the effect of MM use patterns on use of other medications, and perception of underlying disease symptomatology, (3) characterize the impact of MM on neurocognitive performance, including executive function, memory, attention, and decision-making and (4) examine evidence for impact of MM on brain structure and function. This study will enroll 200 adults with no prior history of CUD or heavy marijuana use, who express interest in using MM to treat pain, insomnia, anxiety, and/or depression. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an active MM arm (n = 100), or to a waitlist control arm (WLC) (n = 100). Participants will be assessed at baseline, regularly for 3 months, and at a 6-month and 12-month follow-up for MM use behaviors, development of CUD, perception of disease symptomatology, and neurocognitive performance. Urine collected at each visit will be assessed with quantitative assays. MRI scans will be collected to longitudinally investigate possible brain changes associated with MM use.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
269

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women aged 18-65 years, inclusive;
  2. Competent and willing to provide written informed consent;
  3. Desire to use medical marijuana for self-reported pain, sleep, or affective (mood and/or anxiety including PTSD) symptoms.
  4. Not in possession of a medical marijuana card, but expressing intent to get one.
  5. Able to communicate in English language.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current daily marijuana use (prior to enrollment)
  2. Current substance use disorders (e.g. cocaine, opiate, stimulant). Light to moderate alcohol use is permitted (defined as 16 or less on the AUDIT), and nicotine dependence is permitted because of the high co-use of nicotine and marijuana. Participants cannot meet current SCID criteria for a use disorder on any illicit substance other than nicotine.
  3. Pregnant (verified by a urine test).
  4. In the opinion of the investigator, not able to safely participate in this study because of any medical or psychological issues (e.g. psychosis) that might compromise their safety.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Medical Marijuana Arm
This group can begin using medical marijuana immediately.
Drug: Medical Marijuana
Patients in this group can choose when, where, and how much medical marijuana to use.
Other Names:
  • Cannabis
No Intervention: Waitlist Control Arm
This group agrees to wait 3 months before using medical marijuana.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Difference in Number of Cannabis Use Disorder Symptoms Averaged Over 2, 4, and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks
The DSM-5 Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) Checklist will evaluate symptoms of CUD (number of symptoms). The scale ranges from 0-11, with a higher score indicating a greater number of cannabis use disorder symptoms. A trained member of study staff assessed number of CUD symptoms through a structured interview. Each item was scored as "1" if the participant endorsed the symptom, and scored as "0" if they did not endorse the symptom. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 2, 4, and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks
Mean Difference in Depression Subscale Scores From the HADS Averaged Over 2, 4, and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks
For those with depression symptoms, the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to assess symptoms. The subscale ranges from 0-21, with a higher score indicating worse depression outcomes. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 2, 4, and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks
Mean Difference in Anxiety Subscale Scores From the HADS Averaged Over 2, 4, and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 2 Weeks, 4 Weeks, and 12 Weeks
For those with anxiety symptoms, the anxiety subscale from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to assess symptoms. This subscale ranges from 0-21, with higher scores indicating worse anxiety outcomes. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 2, 4, and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
2 Weeks, 4 Weeks, and 12 Weeks
Mean Difference in Pain Severity Scores on the BPI Average Over 2, 4, and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks
For those with pain, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) severity subscale was used to assess pain symptoms. This scale ranges from 0-10, with a higher score indicating greater pain severity. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 2, 4, and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks
Mean Difference in Sleep Scores on the AIS Averaged Over 2, 4, and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks
For those with insomnia, the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) will be used to assess insomnia symptoms. This scale ranges from 0-24, with higher scores indicating worse sleep outcomes. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 2, 4, and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Difference in Physical Health Scores on the SF-12 Averaged Over 2, 4, and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks
The Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Health Summary Scale was used to assess self-report of physical health. SF-12 scores are based on an Item Response Theory model, in which they are z-scores rescaled to have a mean of 50 (SD=10) in any typical population. There are no range limits to this measure. Higher scores indicate better physical health functioning. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 2, 4, and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks
Mean Difference in Mental Health Scores on the SF-12 Averaged Over 2, 4, and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks
The Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Health Summary Scale was used to assess self-report of mental health. SF-12 scores are based on an Item Response Theory model, in which they are z-scores rescaled to have a mean of 50 (SD=10) in any typical population. This measure has no range limits. Higher scores indicate better mental health functioning. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 2, 4, and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks
Mean Difference in Attention Switching Task: Congruency Cost Scores on the CANTAB Averaged Over 4 and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks
Congruency cost was assessed wth the Attention Switching Task (AST), which assesses attention shifting and executive function via a simple task assessing the direction (pointing left or right) and position (on the left or right side) of an arrow, and is part of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). The range of this measure is -1900 to 1900 ms. It is calculated as the difference in the median latency for incongruent trials (i.e., trials where the direction of the arrow differs from the side it appears) minus the median latency for congruent trials (i.e., trials where the direction of the arrow matches the side it appears). Positive values indicate faster responses to congruent trials. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 4 and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
4 weeks and 12 weeks
Mean Difference in Attention Switching Task: Switching Cost Scores on the CANTAB Averaged Over 4 and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks
Switching cost was assessed with the Attention Switching Task (AST), which assesses attention shifting and executive function via a simple task assessing the direction (pointing left or right) and position (on the left or right side) of an arrow, and is part of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). The range for this measure is -1900 to 1900 ms. It is calculated as the difference in the median latency for blocks of switching trials (i.e., blocks of trials where the response rule switches between indicating the direction of the arrow or the position of the arrow) minus the median latency for blocks of non-switching trials (i.e., blocks of trials where the response rule is always either to indicate the direction of the arrow or the position of the arrow across all trials). Positive scores indicate faster responses to non-switching trials. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 4 and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
4 weeks and 12 weeks
Mean Difference in Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP) Task: Discriminability Scores on the CANTAB Averaged Over 4 and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks
Discriminability was assessed with the Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP) Task, which assesses sustained attention and is part of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Discriminability scores are based on a transformation of response times and accuracy using the EZ-Diffusion model. There are no limits for this measure. Higher scores indicate that subjects can better discriminator between targets and distractors. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 4 and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
4 weeks and 12 weeks
Mean Difference in Paired Associates Learning (PAL) Task: Total Errors Scores on the CANTAB Averaged Over 4 and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks
Total errors were assessed with the Paired Associates Learning (PAL) task, which assesses visual memory and is part of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). The range for this measure is 0 to 70 errors. Higher scores indicate that the subject committed more errors (worse performance). Reported results are an average taken over weeks 4 and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
4 weeks and 12 weeks
Mean Difference in Spatial Working Memory (SWM) Task: Repetition Errors Scores on the CANTAB Averaged Over 4 and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks
Repetition errors were assessed with the Spatial Working Memory (SWM) task, which assesses spatial working memory and executive function. It is part of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). The range for this measure is 0 to 63 errors. Higher scores indicate that more repetition errors were committed (worse performance). Reported results are an average taken over weeks 4 and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
4 weeks and 12 weeks
Mean Difference in Verbal Recognition Memory (VRM) Task: d' Scores on the CANTAB Averaged Over 4 and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks
Discriminability was assessed with the Verbal Recognition Memory task (VRM), which assess verbal memory. It is part of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Discriminability scores are based on a transformation of hit and false alarm rates using a signal detection theory (SDT) model.There are no limits for this measure. Higher scores indicate that a subject was able to better discriminate between previously studied and novel words. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 4 and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
4 weeks and 12 weeks
Mean Difference in Verbal Recognition Memory (VRM) Task: Free Recall Memory Scores on the CANTAB Averaged Over 4 and 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks
Free Recall Memory was assessed with the Verbal Recognition Memory task (VRM), which assesses verbal memory. It is part of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). The range for this measure is 0 to 18 words recalled. Higher scores indicate that subjects were able to correctly recall more previously studied words. Reported results are an average taken over weeks 4 and 12 to be consistent with the regression model estimates.
4 weeks and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Massachusetts General Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jodi M Gilman, PhD, Assistant Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 5, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2015P001600

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Medical Marijuana

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings