Low-dose Apatinib Combined With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Early Triple Negative Breast Cancer (LANCET)

January 29, 2022 updated by: Kun Wang, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Low-dose Apatinib Combined With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Early Triple Negative Breast Cancer (LANCET): A Multicenter, Single-arm, Phase II Trial

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a special type of breast cancer, endocrine therapy and targeted therapy are completely ineffective, chemotherapy is currently the only effective treatment. How to improve postoperative pathologic complete response（pCR）of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is critical problem to prolong event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of TNBC patients. Apatinib is a new oral small molecule tyrosine protease inhibitor, it is effective in inhibiting angiogenesis with a very low concentration. So the standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel and carboplatin combined with apatinib may improve the postoperative pCR and survival outcomes of TNBC patients. Safety and tolerability assessed by number of grade 3 and 4 toxicities and hospitalizations.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

All enrolled patients were administered oral apatinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily and intravenously docetaxel (100 mg/m2) every three weeks for four cycles, followed by epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) every three weeks for four cycles. All the treatments were continued until disease progression, patient withdrawal, or unacceptable toxic effects. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) used for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia was permitted according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines. The biochemical and hematological indexes were evaluated every cycle. Dose modifications of chemotherapy agents, including dose interruptions and dose reductions, were permitted due to certain adverse events.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Guangzhou, China
        • Guangdong General Hospital
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Guangdong General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or pathologically confirmed noninflammatory Triple-Negative invasive breast carcinoma (TNBC). The diagnosis of TNBC was defined below: the estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negativity rates were less than 10%, and the human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) staining was 0 or 1+, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detected no HER2 gene amplification
  • Clinical stage IIA-IIIB
  • Patients must have measurable disease as defined by palpable lesion with caliper and/or a positive mammogram or ultrasound. Bilateral mammogram and clip placement is required for study entry. Baseline measurements of the indicator lesions must be recorded on the Patient Registration Form. To be valid for baseline, the measurements must have been made within the 14 days if palpable. If not palpable, a mammogram or MRI must be done within 14 days. If palpable, a mammogram or MRI must be done within 2 months prior to study entry. If clinically indicated, x-rays and scans must be done within 28 days of study entry.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance status 0 to 1 within 14 days of study entry
  • Signed informed consent
  • Adequate organ function within 2 weeks of study entry: Absolute bone marrow function (hemoglobin concentration of ≥8.0 g/dL, white blood cell count of ≥3000 cells per μL, absolute neutrophil count of ≥1500 cells per μL, platelet count of ≥70000 cells per μL), adequate renal function (creatinine was the upper limit of normal or lower), and adequate liver function (total bilirubin was the upper limit of normal or lower, and aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase was twice the upper limit of normal or lower)
  • Patients must be aged 18-70 years
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test performed within 7 days prior to the start of treatment
  • Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (barrier method of birth control) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastatic disease
  • Prior chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biologic therapy, investigational agent, targeted therapy or radiation therapy for current breast cancer. Patients with history of breast cancer greater than 5 years from initial diagnosis are eligible for the study. Patients may not have received anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the past. Patients with history of ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS) are eligible if there were treated with surgery alone
  • History of previous or current malignancy at other sites with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Patients with a history of other malignancies, who remain disease free for greater than five years are eligible
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure, previous exposure to apatinib, known allergies to any of the excipients, and a history of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, or class III/IV congestive heart failure (defined by the New York Heart Association) within the past 6 months before day 1 of the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental Group
Four cycles of docetaxel combined with apatinib followed by four cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Drug: Apatinib
All enrolled patients were administered oral apatinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily and intravenously docetaxel (100 mg/m2) every three weeks for four cycles, followed by epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) every three weeks for four cycles. All the treatments were continued until disease progression, patient withdrawal, or unacceptable toxic effects.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the breast and lymph nodes (ypTis/0ypN0)
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks (at the end of cycle 8, each cycle is 21 days)
Absence of invasive tumor cells in the breast and lymph nodes and was determined by a local pathologist
up to 24 weeks (at the end of cycle 8, each cycle is 21 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks (at the end of cycle 8, each cycle is 21 days)
ORR was assessed according to RECIST version 1.1, which included patients with measurable disease who achieved a complete or partial response of target lesions.
up to 24 weeks (at the end of cycle 8, each cycle is 21 days)
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The interval from the start of treatment to progression prior to surgery, post-surgery recurrence, or death due to any cause
up to 24 months
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The time from registration to death from any cause
up to 24 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
The treatment-related adverse events were assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE 4.0).
up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Kun Wang, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 13, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20170328

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Apatinib

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings