The Impact of Heart Rate on Central Blood Pressure in Sick Sinus Syndrome Patients With a Permanent Cardiac Pacemaker

July 6, 2018 updated by: Tuuli Teeäär, Tartu University Hospital

The Impact of Heart Rate on Central Hemodynamics in Sick Sinus Syndrome Patients With a Permanent Cardiac Pacemaker

This study is divided into two parts:

  • The first part evaluates the acute effect of non-pharmacological heart rate change on central hemodynamic parameters noninvasively in sick sinus syndrome patients with a permanent cardiac pacemaker
  • The second part evaluates the acute effects of atenolol, nebivolol and ivabradine on central hemodynamic parameters noninvasively in sick sinus syndrome patients with a permanent cardiac pacemaker at different pacing rate levels

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with sick sinus syndrome and a double-chamber cardiac pacemaker are studied.

  • To investigate the role of non-pharmacological heart rate change on central hemodynamics in the first part of the study, the investigators acutely change pacing rate from atrial paced-atrial sensed (AAI)-mode 60 to 40 to 90 bpm and obtain hemodynamic parameters noninvasively after a short stabilisation period after each pacemaker rate change.
  • Subsequently, to investigate the acute effects of beta-blockers or ivabradine on central hemodynamics in the second part of the study, the investigators obtain central hemodynamic parameters noninvasively after acute administration of atenolol, nebivolol or ivabradine at the same pacing rate levels used in the first part of the study (AAI-mode 60, 40 and 90 bpm).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
27

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-75 years;
  • dual-chamber pacemaker implanted due to sick sinus syndrome at least six months before; sinus rhythm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • average seated office brachial systolic BP ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 100 mmHg; atrial pacing <40%;
  • ventricular pacing >25%;
  • unpaced QRS >120 ms and/or QTc >500 ms on 12-lead ECG;
  • atrioventricular blockage at AAI-mode 90 bpm; resting HR >60 bpm at AAI-mode 40 bpm; irregular heart rate;
  • automatic mode switching >10%;
  • implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronisation therapy pacemaker; treatment with digoxin, class Ic or III antiarrhythmic drugs;
  • history of acute coronary syndrome;
  • stable angina pectoris;
  • heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction;
  • history of cerebrovascular event;
  • diabetes mellitus;
  • chronic kidney disease with eGFR <30 ml/min/m2;
  • peripheral artery disease;
  • clinically relevant heart valve disease;
  • active cancer;
  • acute or chronic inflammatory disease;
  • severe chronic respiratory or liver disease;
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • contraindication or intolerance to atenolol, nebivolol, ivabradine or adjuvants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Subjects
Subjects with a cardiac pacemaker
Device: AAI 40 bpm
Cardiac pacemaker of the subjects is set to AAI-mode 40 bpm in the first and second part of the study
Device: AAI 60 bpm
Cardiac pacemaker of the subjects is set to AAI-mode 60 bpm in the first and second part of the study
Device: AAI 90 bpm
Cardiac pacemaker of the subjects is set to AAI-mode 90 bpm in the first and second part of the study
Drug: Atenolol Pill
50 or 100 mg of atenolol is administered to subjects in the second part of the study
Drug: Nebivolol Pill
5 mg of nebivolol is administered to subjects in the second part of the study
Drug: Ivabradine Pill
5 or 7,5 mg of ivabradine is administered to subjects in the second part of the study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
First part of the study: central systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 3 minutes after heart rate change
3 minutes after heart rate change
Second part of the study: systolic blood pressure amplification
Time Frame: 3 hours after drug administration and 3 minutes after heart rate change
difference between peripheral and central systolic blood pressure
3 hours after drug administration and 3 minutes after heart rate change

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tartu University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 6, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 14058

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

all data shared after completion of study as supplement to journal article

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Blood Pressure

Clinical Trials on AAI 40 bpm

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings