Tunnel Technique With Emdogain® in Addition to Connective Tissue Graft Compared With Connective Tissue Graft Alone for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Tunnel Technique With Emdogain® in Addition to Connective Tissue Graft Compared With Connective Tissue Graft Alone for the Treatment of Gingival (Periodontal?) Recessions: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Tomasz Kaczynski, DDS
- Phone Number: +48 22 502 20 99
- Email: t.kaczynski@me.com
Study Locations
-
-
Mazowsze
-
Warsaw, Mazowsze, Poland, 00-246
- Recruiting
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Bilateral multiple gingival recessions in homologous teeth
Exclusion Criteria:
- Full-mouth plaque index ≥ 20% (Ainamo & Bay 1975)
- Full-mouth sulcus bleeding index ≥ 15% (Mühlemann & Son 1971)
- Smoking
- Systemic diseases with compromised healing potential of infectious diseases
- Drugs affecting periodontal health / healing
- Pregnant and lactating females
- Previous periodontal surgery in the area
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Recession coverage with connective tissue graft + Emdogain®
A modified microsurgical tunnel technique by Zuhr et al. (2007).
Initial sulcular incisions with a microsurgical blade are followed by a split-thickness buccal flap preparations using the tunneling knives.
The preparation is extended into the mucosal tissue to gain sufficient flap mobility.
The papillary regions are detached in their buccal aspects with the periosteum.
The root surfaces are applied with 24% EDTA (PrefGel®, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) for 2 minutes and then washed with saline.
Subsequently, EMD (Emdogain®, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) is applied on root surfaces.
The graft is inserted into the tunnel and stabilized with absorbable suspensory sutures.
The buccal flap is advanced coronally and stabilized with non-absorbable suspensory sutures.
|
The tunnel technique for root coverage with Emdogain
|
|
Active Comparator: Recession coverage with connective tissue graft
Procedure: A modified microsurgical tunnel technique by Zuhr et al. (2007).
Initial sulcular incisions with a microsurgical blade are followed by a split-thickness buccal flap preparations using the tunneling knives.
The preparation is extended into the mucosal tissue to gain sufficient flap mobility.
The papillary regions are detached in their buccal aspects with the periosteum.
The graft is inserted into the tunnel and stabilized with absorbable suspensory sutures.
The buccal flap is advanced coronally and stabilized with non-absorbable suspensory sutures.
|
The tunnel technique for root coverage without Emdogain
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
|
Distance from the cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
|
6 months after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recession height (RH)
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
|
Distance from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin
|
6 months after surgery
|
|
Recession width (RW)
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
|
Distance measured horizontally at cementoenamel junction level from one border of the recession to another
|
6 months after surgery
|
|
Width of keratinized tissue (WKT)
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
|
Distance between the most apical point of the gingival margin and the mucogingival junction
|
6 months after surgery
|
|
Thickness of keratinized tissue (TKT)
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
|
Thickness of the gingiva measured 2 mm apical to the gingival margin
|
6 months after surgery
|
|
Average recession coverage (ARC)
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
|
The percentage of covered recession area
|
6 months after surgery
|
|
Complete recession coverage
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
|
The percentage of sites with complete root coverage
|
6 months after surgery
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
|
Distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
|
6 months after surgery
|
|
Root coverage esthetic score (RES)
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
|
A score including root coverage, marginal gingival tissue contour, mucogingival junction alignment, soft tissue texture and gingival colour according to Cairo et al. (1999)
|
6 months after surgery
|
|
Post surgical pain and swelling
Time Frame: 1, 2, 4, 7 and 14 days after surgery
|
Questionnaire about post surgical pain and swelling using a Visual Analog Scale with values 0 (no pain / swelling), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5(moderate pain/swelling), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 (worst pain / swelling).
Lower values represent lower post surgical discomfort and are considered better.
|
1, 2, 4, 7 and 14 days after surgery
|
|
Patient's satisfaction with treatment
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
|
Questionnaire about patient's esthetic perception of gingiva and overall satisfaction using a Visual Analog Scale from 0 (dissatisfaction with esthetic outcome), 2, 3, 4, 5 (moderate satisfaction with easthetic outcome), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 (best satisfaction with esthetic outcome).
Higher values are considered better.
|
6 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- WUM.PERIO.01
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession
-
NCT07158528RecruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recession, Generalized | Gingival Recession, Localized | Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery | Gingival Recessions | Gingival Recession Generalized Moderate | Gingival Recession Localized Moderate
-
NCT07158541RecruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recession | Gingival Recession, Localized | Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery | Gingival Recession Localized Moderate
-
NCT06940050RecruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recession, Localized | Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery | Gingival Recessions
-
NCT06675734CompletedGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recession, Generalized | Gingival Recession, Localized
-
NCT07345520CompletedGingival Recession, Localized
-
NCT07529340Not yet recruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery
-
NCT07162207Active, not recruitingGingival Recession, Localized
-
NCT07521566Active, not recruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recessions
-
NCT06936592Not yet recruitingGingival Diseases | Gingival Recession, Localized | Recession, Gingival
-
NCT07602829Active, not recruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery
Clinical Trials on The tunnel technique for root coverage with Emdogain
-
NCT03619096WithdrawnGingival Recession | Gingival Recession, Generalized | Xenograft Model
-
NCT05045586Recruiting
-
NCT03582995CompletedRecession, Gingival
-
NCT06228534CompletedGingival Recession | Gingival Recession, Localized
-
NCT03059966Completed
-
NCT03615092Completed
-
NCT06793969Recruiting