Brain Networks and Mobility Function: B-NET (B-NET)

August 14, 2023 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Rapidly accumulating evidence indicates that the central nervous system (CNS) plays a pivotal role in mobility function with age-associated CNS changes strongly contributing to declining mobility. Studies linking the brain to mobility have used anatomical measures like brain volume and white matter integrity, and suggest that damage to the connecting fibers of the brain (white matter) is related to mobility impairment. Unfortunately, age-related structural white matter damage appears irreversible and only indirectly indicates the functional connectivity between brain regions. It is believed that functional brain network analyses have the potential to identify individuals that may benefit from interventions prior to the development of irreversible white matter lesions. The current project will assess both physical and cognitive function and integrate these variables with measures of brain network connectivity.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Studies linking the brain to mobility have used anatomical measures like brain volume and white matter integrity, and suggest that damage to the connecting fibers of the brain (white matter) is related to mobility impairment. Unfortunately, age-related structural white matter damage appears irreversible and only indirectly indicates the functional connectivity between brain regions. The preliminary data show that directly assessed patterns of functional connectivity correlate with mobility function and can be changed by interventions that improve mobility function. It is not known how changes in CNS functional connectivity relate to changes in mobility, information critical for the design of interventions targeting CNS connectivity to improve mobility impairments. It is clear that structural connectivity underlies functional connectivity, and that structural brain lesions result in altered functional connections. B-NET will assess white matter (WM) disease burden and microstructural changes and relate these changes to functional brain network connectivity. We hypothesize that because sensory motor cortex community structure (SMC-CS) characterizes current brain organization, it will be associated with mobility function independently of anatomical damage markers. Such knowledge may permit earlier identification of persons at high risk for mobility decline and facilitate earlier and better targeted interventions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
192

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Community-dwelling adults reflecting the gender/race composition of Forsyth County in the target age-range will be identified. The 70 and up age-span was chosen because epidemiologic data shows accelerating functional decline and increased prevalence of white matter abnormalities across this age-range.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-dwelling adults aged ≥70 years
  • Willing to provide informed consent; ability to communicate with study personnel.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious or uncontrolled chronic disease such as:
  • Cancer (stage 3 or 4) or having had radiation or chemotherapy in the past year
  • Uncontrolled angina
  • Heart failure (stage 3-4)
  • Respiratory disease requiring the use of oxygen
  • Uncontrolled endocrine/metabolic disease (fasting glucose >250mg/dL)
  • Liver failure (AST > 40IU/L and/or ALT > 44 IU/L)
  • Renal failure requiring dialysis
  • Clinically diagnosed neurologic diseases: Parkinson's disease; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS); Multiple Sclerosis, prior stroke with residual effects lasting longer than 24hrs
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar, or other psychotic disorder
  • Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or evidence of impaired cognitive function
  • Prior traumatic brain injury with residual deficits
  • Unwilling or unable to have an MRI brain scan (see MRI screening form).
  • Dependent on a walker or another person to ambulate.
  • Plans to relocate in the next 2- 3 years.
  • Single or double amputee
  • Musculoskeletal impairments severe enough to preclude functional testing
  • Participating in an exercise or cognitive enhancing intervention
  • Any other reason the PI or study physician feels the participant would not adhere to the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Community-Dwelling Older Adults
The group will consist of 240 community-dwelling older adults with a range of mobility function based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Extended Short Physical Performance Battery (eSPPB)
Time Frame: baseline and 6, 18, and 30 months
The expanded Short Physical Performance Battery (eSPPB) is a modified version of a widely used assessment of lower extremity physical function that consists of 3 standing balance tasks held for 10 seconds each (side-by-side, tandem and semi-tandem), two 4-m walk tests to assess usual gait speed, and 5 repeated chair stands. To minimize ceiling effects and maximize overall dispersion of test scores, the eSPPB increases the holding time of the semi- and full-tandem stands to 30 seconds and adds a single leg stand and a narrow walk test of balance (walking at usual pace within lines of tape spaced 20 cm apart). eSPPB scores are continuous and range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicative of better performance.
baseline and 6, 18, and 30 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cardiovascular fitness
Time Frame: baseline and 18 and 30 months
The fast-paced 400M walk protocol will be used.
baseline and 18 and 30 months
Change in Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)
Time Frame: baseline and 18 and 30 months
The WAIS-III Digit Symbol Substitution Test will be used.
baseline and 18 and 30 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Gait Speed
Time Frame: baseline and 18 and 30 months
This will be assessed over 4 meters 3 times at usual pace and 3 times at fast pace using an instrumented mat (GAITRite System), which provides data on average step and stride length, initial and terminal double support time, as well as the variability in these measures
baseline and 18 and 30 months
Change in lower extremity muscle strength
Time Frame: baseline and 18 and 30 months
Maximal isokinetic knee extension and flexion strength will be measured using an isokinetic dynamometer
baseline and 18 and 30 months
Change in postural sway
Time Frame: baseline and 18 and 30 months
Postural sway during quiet stance will be assessed from Center-of-Pressure (COP) trajectory data collected at 100 Hz using an Advanced Mechanical Technology Incorporated (AMTI) AccuSway biomechanics force platform.
baseline and 18 and 30 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Kritchevsky, PhD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 12, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 12, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 14, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00046460
  • 1R01AG052419-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Central Nervous System

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings