Novel Helmet Design in Patients With Seizures

January 3, 2025 updated by: Michael A. Gelfand, MD, PhD

A Pilot Study of the Safety of a Novel Helmet Design in Patients With Seizures

This is a two-part study that aims to determine the reliability and safety of the use of the Hövding inflatable helmet in seizures, as evidenced by the deployment of the helmet during seizures, and qualitative patient reporting.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Part 1: 4 healthy volunteers will fall from a standing position onto a padded surface to evaluate for consistent helmet deployment from a standing position. Part 2: up to 20 patients with drug resistant epilepsy who do not use existing head-protective devices will be enrolled and assigned to first enter "helmet" or "no helmet" groups. When assigned to the "helmet" group, patients will wear the helmet until deployment during a seizure or up to 3 months. Subjects will complete questionnaires about their seizures including any injuries sustained, post concussive symptom questionnaire, and the circumstances of inflation. Patients will return to site after helmet deployment. While assigned to the "no helmet" group, patients will complete the same questionnaires, except those relating to helmet inflation. We will compare circumstances, injuries, and post concussive scales in seizures resulting in falls occurring while the helmet was worn versus seizures resulting in falls occurring while the helmet was not being worn.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
9

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Part 1:

  1. Age 18-60 at the time of enrollment.
  2. Have neck circumference between 34 and 42 cm.
  3. Can understand and provide written informed consent.
  4. Must be competent to follow all study procedures.
  5. Able to read, speak, and understand English.

Part 2:

  1. Have at least one seizure every 6 months that might result in a fall (Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizure, Atonic Seizure, and/or Complex Partial Seizure resulting in a fall).
  2. Has a seizure frequency of at least once per 2 months.
  3. Be between ages 18-65 at the time of enrollment.
  4. Have neck circumference between 34 and 42 cm
  5. Must live in a home with electrical power supply.
  6. If female and of childbearing potential, has negative pregnancy test at the beginning of the study and willing to use appropriate birth control for the duration of the study.
  7. Can understand and sign written informed consent.
  8. Must be competent to follow all study procedures.
  9. Able to read, speak, and understand English.

Exclusion Criteria:

Part 1:

1. Subject is currently pregnant

Part 2:

  1. Patient already wears a helmet for seizure safety.
  2. Subject is pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study, or is unwilling to use an appropriate form of birth control during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Part 2: Helmet
After a screening period, 10 patients with drug resistant epilepsy will first be assigned to wear one Hövding inflatable helmet in their daily lives. Subjects will fill out questionnaires about their seizures, injuries, and the circumstances of inflation when it occurs. After experiencing a seizure resulting in a fall or any helmet deployment, patients will crossover to the "no helmet" group. If no seizure resulting in fall occurs in 3 months, participation will end.
Device: Hövding inflatable helmet
The Hövding inflatable helmet is designed for cyclists as a collar with a deployable airbag that inflates when a sensor detects rapid changes in acceleration. The inflated helmet wraps the back and sides of the user's head in inflated nylon fabric which then slowly deflates after deploying.
No Intervention: Part 2: No Helmet
After a screening period, 10 subjects with drug resistant epilepsy will first be assigned to not wear an inflatable helmet. Subjects will fill out questionnaires about their seizures and injuries. After approximately 3 months, patients will crossover to the "helmet" group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part 1: Number of Successful Deployments
Time Frame: 1 day
3 out of 4 successful deployments was set as a criteria to allow advancement to part 2.
1 day
Part 2: Helmet Deployment Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
Differences in Helmet Deployment Questionnaire responses will be compared between subjects wearing helmets during a seizure, and subjects not wearing helmets during a seizure.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Seizure Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
Differences in Seizure Questionnaire responses detailing circumstances of seizure and any injuries sustained will be compared between subjects wearing helmets during a seizure, and subjects not wearing helmets during a seizure, and also between subjects following a seizure in which the helmet deployed, and seizures in which the helmet was either not being worn or did not deploy.
6 months
Injury-related Medical Record Review
Time Frame: 6 months
Differences in injuries resulting from a seizure per injury-related medical record review will be compared between subjects wearing helmets during a seizure, and subjects not wearing helmets during a seizure, and also between subjects following a seizure in which the helmet deployed, and seizures in which the helmet was either not being worn or did not deploy.
6 months
Rivermead Post Concussive Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Differences in head injury symptoms as reported using the Rivermead Post Concussive Scale will be compared between subjects wearing helmets during a seizure, and subjects not wearing helmets during a seizure, and also between subjects following a seizure in which the helmet deployed, and seizures in which the helmet was either not being worn or did not deploy. The scale for each item of this survey: 0 = not experienced at all 1 = no more of a problem 2 = a mild problem 3 = a moderate problem 4 = a severe problem. Each item was assessed as "compared with before the accident, do you now (i.e., over the last 24 hours) suffer from:" or "Are you experiencing any other difficulties?" with a write in option with the same scale. A lower score on each item is better, indicating lesser symptom severity compared to prior to falling with or without the helmet. The score for each item is summed to obtain each patient's total, indicative of total symptom severity. Total range from 0 - 72.
6 months
Helmet Deployment Questionnaire (Seizure/Not Seizure)
Time Frame: 6 months
Differences in helmet deployment questionnaire responses describing events of helmet deployment during seizures resulting in falls will be compared with responses describing helmet deployment (per day of use) not associated with seizure.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Michael A. Gelfand, MD, PhD

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Epilepsy Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Gelfand, MD, PhD, University of Pennsylvania

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 3, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 824620

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Hövding Inc. may receive the used helmets and the information about how they were deployed. All information shared will be deidentified.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizure

Clinical Trials on Hövding inflatable helmet

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings