Convection Enhanced Delivery of CSF in DBS for Parkinson's

March 16, 2021 updated by: Jeff Elias, MD

Convection Enhanced Delivery of Autologous Cerebral Spinal Fluid Improves MRI Visualizations of Basal Ganglion Nuclei During Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

This study will evaluate safety foremost but also the distribution and initial effectiveness of infusion-enhanced, MRI-guided DBS for patients with medication-refractory, Parkinson's disease

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an open-label, single-arm, pilot study investigating the safety and feasibility of infusion-enhanced, MRI-guided DBS electrode placement. The investigators intend to enroll patients with Parkinson's disease and medically-refractory motor symptoms, who are already planned for MRI-guided DBS electrodes under general anesthesia. The hypothesis of the study is that a convective micro-infusion of autologous CSF will enhance the T2-weighted MRI visualization of the targeted nucleus during image-guided DBS surgery for Parkinson's disease. The investigators will record standard clinical measures of PD at baseline and 6 months following DBS surgery. The study will recruit patients at a rate of approximately one a month and will take less than two years to complete.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
4

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women, age 30 years and older
  2. Subjects with advanced PD who are scheduled for MRI-guided DBS surgery under general anesthesia
  3. Subjects who are able and willing to give informed consent and able to attend clinic visits through 6 months
  4. The target nucleus, GPi or STN, is visible on MRI so that it can be targeted for the study infusion and then for MRI-guided DBS

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. DBS surgery planned in the awake condition with microelectrode recordings and clinical testing
  2. Spinal pathology not amenable to lumbar puncture
  3. Subjects who have had deep brain stimulation or a prior stereotactic ablation of the basal ganglia
  4. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity as determined by the neuropsychologist
  5. Are participating or have participated in another clinical trial in the last 30 days
  6. Any illness that in the investigator's opinion preclude participation in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Intracerebral Infusion of Autologous CSF
All subjects will receive the intracerebral infusion of autologous cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) during their deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. The DBS surgery will be performed on the targeted nucleus either bilaterally or unilaterally, as previously determined by a multidisciplinary team of neurology, neurosurgery, and neuropsychology. During unilateral DBS surgery, the targeted nucleus will be infused using convection enhanced delivery (CED). The nondominant side will be infused during a bilateral DBS procedure.
Device: Intracerebral Infusion of Autologous Cerebral Spinal Fluid
Unilateral infusion of 0.5 ml autologous CSF before DBS electrode insertion with MRI monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
Safety will be determined by an evaluation of the incidence and severity of infusion-related side effects and complications from the first treatment day visit through the 6-month post-treatment time point. All AEs will be reported and categorized by investigators as definitely, probably, possibly, unlikely, or unrelated to the CSF infusion, and/or Parkinson's disease progression. Safety will be assessed by incidence and severity of AEs, including changes in physical examinations and neurological examinations, and the number of discontinuations due to AEs.
6 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
% Change in Un-medicated UPDRS, Motor Subsection (Part III) From Baseline to 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively in comparison to baseline
The efficacy endpoint will be focused on determining the degree of change in motor symptoms as measured from the in-medicated UPDRS, motor subsection (Part III).
6 months postoperatively in comparison to baseline
Vd/Vi Ratio
Time Frame: Day of Surgery
The ratio of the volume of distribution (Vd) immediately following the infusion (Vi) with intraoperative 1.5T MRI, T2-weighted sequences to the volume of the infusion (Vi) will be calculated. Each volume is measured in microliters (uL). The distribution of the infusion by convective properties in a deep brain human nucleus (GPi or STN) will be determined by calculating the Vd/Vi ratio.
Day of Surgery
Baseline Levodopa Medication Equivalents (Milligrams)
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Change in Quality of Life Assessment With PDQ-39 Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively in comparison to baseline
The PDQ-39 questionnaire includes 39 quality of life questions rated on a scale of 0-4. 0 indicating least frequent (never) and 4 indicating most frequent (always). The mean change in the sum of the PDQ-39 questionnaire is being reported with a overall score of 0 being the best quality of life and a maximum score of 156 being the worst possible quality of life.
6 months postoperatively in comparison to baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jeff Elias, MD

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 13, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 18, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 18, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB-HSR #20457

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Intracerebral Infusion of Autologous Cerebral Spinal Fluid

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings