Misoprostol Treatment of Mid Trimester Incomplete Abortion by Midwives and Doctors in Uganda.

March 9, 2022 updated by: Makerere University

Safety, Effectiveness and Acceptability of Misoprostol When Administered by Midwives Versus Physicians for Management of Incomplete Mid Trimester Abortion in Uganda: a Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial.

It is estimated that 47,000 women die every year due to consequences of unsafe abortion globally. The majority of pregnancy related deaths occur in low income countries where induced abortion is restricted, unmet need for contraception is high, and women's status is low. Uganda has a high total fertility rate of 5.4 children per woman, low contraceptive prevalence rate of 39%, and more than half of these pregnancies are unintended. Induced abortion is controversial and restricted in Uganda and legally permitted only to save a woman's life. As a result, women often resort to unsafe abortion- that's either performed by a person lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards. Of the estimated 314,304 women who undergo unsafe abortions each year in Uganda, about 41% receive treatment for complications. This equates to an annual rate of 12 per 1,000 women aged 15-49 years being hospitalized for induced abortion complications, which is considered high in international comparison. In Uganda, outside the larger hospitals and private settings, access to safe post abortion care and surgical facilities are scarce. Studies have showed that trained midwives can deliver safe, effective and acceptable post abortion care using misoprostol in the first trimester. Currently in Uganda, treatment of second trimester incomplete abortion is restricted to physicians. This study will provide evidence on whether treatment for incomplete abortion using misoprostol by mid-level providers can be extended to the early second trimester period. The investigators hypothesize that misoprostol treatment for incomplete second trimester abortion provided by midwives is equivalent to that of physicians requiring no further surgical intervention. Women with incomplete abortion will be randomly allocated to undergo a clinical assessment and treatment with misoprostol either by physician or midwife with safety and effectiveness as main outcomes in the RCT carried out in hospital and high volume health centres in Central Uganda.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled equivalence trial (RCT) implemented at eight hospitals and Health centres in Central Uganda will include 1192 eligible women with incomplete abortion of uterine size >12 weeks up to 18 weeks. Following informed consent, each participant will be randomly assigned to undergo a clinical assessment and treatment by either a midwife (intervention arm) or physician (control arm); receive 400mcg of misoprostol administered sublingually 3 hourly up to 5 doses within 24 hours at the health facility until a complete abortion is confirmed. Women who do not achieve a complete abortion within 24 hours will undergo a surgical method of uterine evacuation. Pre-discharge information on danger signs, contraceptive counselling and provision will be done with follow up 14 days later to assess secondary outcomes and acceptability. Analyses will be by Intention-to-Treat (ITT). Background characteristics and outcomes will be presented using descriptive statistics. Differences between groups will be analyzed using risk difference (95% CI) and equivalence established if it lies between the pre-defined range of -5% to +5%. Chi-square test will be used for comparison of outcome and t test used to compare mean values. P-values equal to or lower than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1191

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Uganda
      • Entebbe, Uganda
        • Entebbe Hospital
      • Gombe, Uganda
        • Gombe Hospital
      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Kawempe Hospital
      • Kayunga, Uganda, 256
        • Kayunga Hospital
      • Lugazi, Uganda, 256
        • Kawolo Hospital
      • Luwero, Uganda
        • Luwero HC IV
      • Masaka, Uganda
        • Masaka Hospital
      • Mityana, Uganda
        • Mityana Hospital
      • Mpigi, Uganda
        • Mpigi HC IV
      • Mubende, Uganda, 256
        • Kiganda HC IV
      • Mukono, Uganda
        • Mukono HC IV
      • Nakaseke, Uganda
        • Nakaseke Hospital
      • Wakiso, Uganda, 256
        • Kasangati HC IV
      • Wakiso, Uganda, 256
        • Wakiso HC IV

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Vaginal bleeding
  • With or without contractions with a uterine size > 12 weeks to < 18 weeks
  • History of partial expulsion
  • Open cervical os.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to misoprostol,
  • Unstable hemodynamic status (systolic blood pressure < 90mmHg) and shock
  • Signs of pelvic infection and/or sepsis
  • Previous caesarean delivery/uterine scar
  • Suspected extra uterine pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Misoprostol treatment by Midwife
Administration of misoprostol by the midwife and assessment for the primary outcome.
Other: Misoprostol treatment by Midwife
Medical management of incomplete abortion
Active Comparator: Misoprostol treatment by Doctor
Administration of misoprostol by the doctor and assessment for the primary outcome.
Other: Misoprostol treatment by Doctor
Medical management of incomplete abortion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete abortion
Time Frame: 24 hours from treatment initiation
Number of participants who will have expelled all the products of conception as evidenced by cessation of abdominal cramps, vaginal bleeding and closed cervical os.
24 hours from treatment initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Excessive vaginal bleeding
Time Frame: 24 hours from treatment initiation
Participant reporting use of more than 3 pads in an hour.
24 hours from treatment initiation
Abdominal Pain
Time Frame: 24 hours from treatment initiation
Pain will be defined as discomfort experienced in the lower abdomen using a visual analogue scale with a minimum score of zero representing no pain and a maximum score of 10 representing most pain. A higher score represents a worse outcome.
24 hours from treatment initiation
Unscheduled visits
Time Frame: 14-28 days post treatment
Participant presenting at the study site when not expected
14-28 days post treatment
Women's acceptability of the post abortion care provider
Time Frame: 14-28 days post treatment
Acceptability will be positive reporting of treatment experience, recommendation of method to a friend or reuse of same method.
14-28 days post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Makerere University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Karolinska Institutet

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kristina G Danielsson, PhD, Karolinska Institutet
  • Principal Investigator: Josaphat Byamugisha, PhD, Makerere University
  • Principal Investigator: Susan Atuhairwe, MD, Makerere University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 14, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 16, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 16, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 9, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • REC REF 2017-016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified data will be available on request for systematic reviews. The particular data shared will depend on the request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

December 2025 to December 2030

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Incomplete Abortion

Clinical Trials on Misoprostol treatment by Midwife

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings