Intraperitoneal Dexamethasone vs Dexamethasone Plus Magnesium Sulphate for Pain Relief in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

February 3, 2019 updated by: AbdElKhalik Mahmoud Shaban, Cairo University

Intraperitoneal Dexamethasone vs Dexamethasone Plus Magnesium Sulphate for Pain Relief in Laparoscopic cholecystectomY

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become a standard technique for gall bladder surgery. Benefits in comparison to conventional laparotomy are shorter lived effects on pulmonary function and less postoperative pain . However, patients often suffer from considerable pain during the first 24 postoperative hours. Pain can prolong hospital stay and lead to increased morbidity, which is particularly important now that many centers are performing this operation as a day-case procedure. Administration of intraperitoneal local anesthetic, either during or after surgery, is used by as a method of reducing postoperative pain. Although a number of studies have reported a significant reduction in postoperative pain after the use of intraperitoneal analgesia, others have reported no benefit. Several investigations have been conducted in order to find the cause of this pain. According to some of these investigations, the pain is attributed to peritoneal inflammation due to carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Since steroids have been used for reducing inflammation, they may be considered as alternatives for relieving pain. Dexamethasone is a strong long acting glucocorticoid and it is widely used after surgery. it has been established that steroids are effective in relieving postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Also, administration of magnesium sulphate has been shown to have a potential to prevent postoperative pain and to reduce intra operative anesthetic and analgesic requirements being an antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and its associated ion channels. Some studies showed reduction of pain scores if magnesium sulphate was injected intra-articular and intraperitoneal with no serious adverse effects. In this study the investigators will use intraperitoneal dexamethasone vs dexamethasone plus magnesium sulphate to study their analgesic efficacy after laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the investigators assume that the combination of both drugs will provide stronger analgesia than dexamethasone alone

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
75

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Kasr Alaini hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age group and gender: between 18 to 60 years both males and females
  2. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age < 18 years or > 60 years
  2. ASA physical status III or IV
  3. Patients with diabetes
  4. Patient refusal to participate in the study
  5. Chronic respiratory disease
  6. Advanced renal or hepatic diseases
  7. Use of opioids, tranquilizers or steroids
  8. Confusion or psychiatric illness
  9. Acute cholecystectomy
  10. Patients with peritoneal drain after surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: control group
this group will include 25 patients receiving intraperitoneal 40 ml of normal saline only at the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Drug: Placebo (saline)
before closure of the laparoscopic entering sites the patients received instillation of 40 ml normal saline into the peritoneum
Active Comparator: dexamethasone group
this group will include 25 patients receiving intraperitoneal 16 mg dexamethasone in 40 ml saline at the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Drug: dexamethasone
before closure of the laparoscopic entering sites the patients will receive instillation of 40 ml of normal saline containing 16mg dexamethasone
Active Comparator: dexamethasone plus magnesium sulphate group
this group will include 25 patients receiving intraperitoneal 16 mg dexamethasone plus 2 gm magnesium sulphate at the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Drug: dexamethasone
before closure of the laparoscopic entering sites the patients will receive instillation of 40 ml of normal saline containing 16mg dexamethasone
Drug: magnesium sulphate
patients will receive instillation of 40 ml of normal saline containing 16mg dexamethasone plus magnesium sulphate 2 gm into the peritoneum at the end of the operation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain: VAS
Time Frame: first 24 hours
Postoperative pain scoring using standard Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score of 0-10 (with 0 meaning no pain and 10 meaning the most intense pain ever experienced)
first 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: first 24 hours

Postoperative nausea and vomiting using simplified simplified postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) impact scale which is measured through two questions as following:

Q1. Has the patient vomited or had dry-retching? 0. No

  1. Once
  2. Twice
  3. Three or more times Q2. Has the patient experienced a feeling of nausea (an unsettled feeling in the stomach and slight urge to vomit)? If yes, has the feeling of nausea interfered with activities of daily life, such as being able to get out of bed, being able to move about freely in bed, being able to walk normally, or eating and drinking?

0. Not at all

  1. Sometimes
  2. Often or most of the time
  3. All of the time. To calculate the PONV Impact Scale, the numerical responses to questions 1 and 2 will be added. Several vomits or dry-retching events occurring over a short time frame e.g 5 min, will be counted as one vomiting/dry-retching episode.
first 24 hours
Heart rate
Time Frame: first 24 hours
first 24 hours
arterial blood pressure measurement postoperative
Time Frame: first 24 hours
systolic and diastolic blood pressure
first 24 hours
doses of consumed postoperative analgesics
Time Frame: first 24 hours
first 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 27, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • N-9-2018

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Placebo (saline)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings