Feasibility and Utilization of an Application-based Question Prompt List
Improving Treatment Cost Discussions Between Cancer Patients and Their Oncologists: Feasibility and Utilization of an Application-based Question Prompt List
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
- Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Medical oncologists or radiation oncologists at KCI McLaren Detroit, McLaren Flint, McLaren Macomb and McLaren Port Huron oncology centers
- Oncologists will be eligible if they treat patients with prostate, breast, lung or colorectal cancers.
- Oncologists will be consented
- Patients must be 18 yrs. old or older
- Patients will be consented
- Patients must be able to read and write in English
- Patients must have a confirmed diagnosis of breast, prostate, lung or colorectal cancer and are scheduled to see an oncologist for an initial treatment discussion.
Exclusion Criteria:
- N/A
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Arm
This feasibility study includes only one arm.
All enrolled patients will be asked to use the intervention.
|
The DISCO App is an app-based and patient-focused intervention designed to improve the frequency and quality of patient-oncologist treatment cost discussions.
The DISCO App allows patients to provide basic demographic information (e.g., employment status, insurance status, etc), and uses that information to provide patients with an individually-tailored list of treatment cost questions they can ask their provider.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-oncologist treatment cost discussions
Time Frame: During the treatment discussions and observed via video recordings of those discussions.
|
Observational measures using video-recorded patient-oncologist treatment discussions
|
During the treatment discussions and observed via video recordings of those discussions.
|
|
Patient-oncologist treatment cost discussions
Time Frame: Collected immediately after the interaction with the oncologist
|
Self-report measures of if and how patients and oncologists discuss treatment cost.
|
Collected immediately after the interaction with the oncologist
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient financial demographics
Time Frame: Collected immediately prior to the interaction with the oncologist
|
Patient financial situation (e.g., income, perceived economic burden, etc.)
|
Collected immediately prior to the interaction with the oncologist
|
|
Change in patient treatment cost information desired and gained
Time Frame: Collected immediately prior to and immediately after the interaction with the oncologist
|
What cost treatment information patients want before the interaction and if they gained it during the interaction with their oncologist.
|
Collected immediately prior to and immediately after the interaction with the oncologist
|
|
Change in patient efficacy in managing treatment cost (10-item scale). This measure will assess any change in the patients' efficacy in paying for the cost of their cancer treatment before and after the intervention.
Time Frame: Collected immediately prior to and immediately after the interaction with the oncologist
|
If patients think they will be able to pay for the cost of their cancer treatment.
This is adapted from a validated 10-item scale (Peterson AM, Harper FW, Albrecht TL, et al.
Parent caregiver self-efficacy and child reactions to pediatric cancer treatment procedures.
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs.
2014;31(1):18-27.)
An example item is: "I am confident I can pay for the costs of my treatment."
Patients will respond to a scale from Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly Agree (5) with higher values representing a better outcome.
|
Collected immediately prior to and immediately after the interaction with the oncologist
|
|
Satisfaction with treatment cost discussions (3-item scale). This will assess the extent to which patients are satisfied with any discussions of treatment cost they had with their oncologist.
Time Frame: Collected immediately after the interaction with the oncologist
|
The extent to which patients are satisfied with any treatment cost discussion they had with their oncologist.
This is an investigator-developed 3-item scale.
An example item is: "I am satisfied with how my oncologist and I discussed treatment cost today."
Patients will respond to a scale from Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly Agree (5) with higher values representing a better outcome.
|
Collected immediately after the interaction with the oncologist
|
|
Length of the interaction
Time Frame: During the patient-oncologist interaction and observed via video recordings of the treatment discussions
|
Observer measure of the length of the patient-oncologist collected using video recordings.
|
During the patient-oncologist interaction and observed via video recordings of the treatment discussions
|
|
DISCO App use (observer measure)
Time Frame: Prior to and during the patient-oncologist interaction
|
Observer measure of how patients use the DISCO App collected using video recordings
|
Prior to and during the patient-oncologist interaction
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lauren Hamel, Ph.D., Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017-129
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.