Behavioral Economics and Adherence in Teens (BEAT!) (Beat!)

September 2, 2022 updated by: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Beat!: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Non-adherence to antiepileptic drug therapy is a significant problem for adolescents with epilepsy and has a critical impact on health and patient-reported outcomes. Evidence-based adherence interventions are lacking in this population and are critically needed. This proposal seeks to develop and evaluate a mHealth social norms adherence intervention for adolescents with epilepsy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non-adherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is a common problem (i.e., 58% of patients have some level of non-adherence) for youth with epilepsy, with potentially devastating consequences. Adolescents with epilepsy represent a particularly vulnerable group, given their increased independence, decreased parental supervision, higher risk for deficits in organization and memory, busy and changing schedules, low motivation, and increased susceptibility to peer influence. Existing adherence interventions in epilepsy are not designed to meet the unique challenges faced by adolescents, and there are no efficacious interventions for adolescents with epilepsy. Not surprisingly, without efficacious interventions, adherence worsens during adolescence, further increasing the risk of poor health outcomes during this developmental period. While reminder strategies (e.g., automated digital reminders) are effective for the most common adherence barriers of forgetting and busy schedules, they are likely to be ineffective in increasing motivation. Leveraging social norms comparison methods (i.e., feedback about someone else's behavior related to one's own behavior) offers an opportunity to capitalize on the increased importance of peer influence while simultaneously targeting the low motivation characteristic of adolescents. Recent data in adolescents indicates that social norms interventions have incremental value and improve health behaviors above and beyond standard feedback without peer comparisons. Consistent with the ORBIT model for behavioral intervention development, our aims are to: 1) develop a feasible, accessible, and acceptable mHealth social norms intervention for improving AED adherence in adolescents with epilepsy and 2) obtain preliminary efficacy data and effect sizes for a future clinical trial. We conducted a pilot RCT of an mHealth social norms intervention (ORBIT Phase II). Adolescents with epilepsy who demonstrate non-adherence (< 95% adherence based on PI's previous RCTs; 58% of sample) during baseline will be randomized to either 1) mHealth social norms (automated digital reminders, individualized adherence feedback, and social norms feedback) or 2) control (automated digital reminders and individualized adherence feedback). Both groups will receive active intervention for five months. Primary (i.e., electronically-monitored adherence) and secondary outcomes (i.e., seizure severity, HRQOL) will be assessed post-treatment and 3 months later, respectively. If successful, the results of this study would have a large impact on pediatric epilepsy, with the potential to change clinical practice for treating non-adherence by reducing common barriers to behavioral health care. Because minimal clinician time is required, our mHealth social norms intervention also has potential for sustainability and broad dissemination for epilepsy and other pediatric conditions

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
104

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 13-17
  • Confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy
  • Antiepileptic drug monotherapy
  • Ability to read and speak English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No significant developmental delay (e.g., autism, moderate/severe developmental or intellectual disability) or comorbid medical diagnoses (e.g., diabetes)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Control Group
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports
Behavioral: Automated Digital Reminders
Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights
Behavioral: Individualized Adherence Feedback Report
Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors
Experimental: Treatment Group
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports with social norms comparisons
Behavioral: Automated Digital Reminders
Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights
Behavioral: Individual Adherence Feedback Report with Social Norms
Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors compared to other adolescents with epilepsy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Electronically Monitored Adherence
Time Frame: Month 7
A total mean adherence rates will be calculated based on daily adherence rates captured through the SimpleMed Pillboxes or AdhereTech bottles. Scores range from 0-100%, with higher scores representing better adherence.
Month 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Seizure Severity-Clinician Report
Time Frame: Month 9
The Global Assessment of Severity of Epilepsy (GASE) is a one item clinician-rated measure of seizure severity. The total score ranges from 1-7, with higher scores representing more severe epilepsy
Month 9
Seizure Severity-Parent Report
Time Frame: Month 9
The Seizure Severity Scale-Adapted for Children is a caregiver-reported questionnaire, which is 9-items and assess seizure severity, including intrusiveness, frequency, length, and disruptiveness of seizures. A total score is calculated, ranging from 0-3, with higher scores representing worse seizure severity.
Month 9
PedsQL Epilepsy Module - Parent Report
Time Frame: Month 9
The PedsQL-Epilepsy Module is a 29 item measure with several subscales (Impact, Cognitive, Executive Functioning, Sleep, Mood/Behavior) will be used. Scores range from 0-100 for each subscale, with higher scores representing better quality of life.
Month 9
PedsQL Epilepsy Module-Adolescent Report
Time Frame: 9-month
The PedsQL Epilepsy Module is a 29-item health-related quality of life instrument with five subscales, including Impact, Cognitive, Executive Functioning, Sleep, and Mood/Behavior). Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores representing better quality of life.
9-month

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction-Teen Report Total Score
Time Frame: Month 7
Adolescents completed this study specific Satisfaction measure, which was 23-items. This measure assesses satisfaction with the intervention content, relevance, helpfulness, and ease of use. Assessment of perceptions of the impact of what was learned from the intervention were also assessed. Eighteen of the items used a Likert format with the following ratings: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree. A total scale was calculated for the 18 items, which ranges from 18-72, with higher scores reflecting higher satisfaction. Finally, five open-ended items assessing what was most and least helpful about the intervention, what changes adolescents want to see in the intervention, and any additional input.
Month 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Nationwide Children's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 16, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2018-8412
  • R21NR017633 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

This project will have psychosocial, adherence, demographic, and medical data for children with epilepsy. Deidentified data can be used for many secondary analyses. Prior to sharing, all data will be de-identified in a HIPAA-compliant fashion. Data sets will be carefully reviewed to make sure that information such as age and gender cannot be used to gather additional information that could potentially identify individual subjects. For example, only year of birth, rather than the full birth date, will be made available. All categorical demographic variables will be collapsed into categories large enough so that combinations of demographic categories for age, gender, geographic location, etc., will have 10 or more individuals in each cell. All modalities of data will be shared, including raw and aggregate data. Descriptors for all variables shared will be included to prevent misuse or confusion. Any analytical methods utilized to assess the data will be defined in shared formats.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

12 months following completion of the study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

PI will provide the information

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on Automated Digital Reminders

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings