Neuromuscular Blockade in the Intentive Care Unit, an Observational Study. (CURATIV)
The study Short description of the protocol intended for the lay public. Include a brief statement of the study hypothesis. (Limit: 5000 characters) Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are drug capable of inducing a complete paralysis of the muscle. Their use is frequent in the intensive care unit (ICU). Most of the time it is used as a single infusion to facilitate endotracheal intubation, but in the ICU the use of continuous infusion is common in several pathologies: acute distress respiratory syndrome, post-cardiac arrest survivor under hypothermia to prevent shivering, abdominal compartment syndrome, severe traumatic brain injury with uncontrolled intra-cranial pressure and severe asthma among others.
A monitoring of the dose of NMBAs is recommended to guide the depth of paralysis and to guide recovery, but in the ICU, the interest of such a monitoring during continuous infusion is unclear and the level of evidence is low.
The investigators propose to conduct a prospective multicentric observational study to describe the current practice in the use of NMBAs in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. As a primary objective we will describe the prevalence of NMBAs use in the ICU. As a secondary objective, the investigators will investigate the impact of protocol and/or monitoring devices of NMBAs on the dose administered and clinical outcome endpoints.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are usually administered during anesthesia for endotracheal tube placement or surgical interventions. But their use is also common in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) (1, 2). Together with sedation and analgesia, they are mainly used in continuous infusion in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom (ARDS) (3, 4), but also in post-cardiac arrest survivor under hypothermia to prevent shivering (5), in abdominal compartment syndrome (6), in severe traumatic brain injury with uncontrolled intra-cranial pressure (7) and severe asthma among others.
A monitoring of the treatment is recommended (8) and several monitoring techniques exists: qualitative clinical monitoring is known to be inefficient, qualitative clinical monitoring using scores such as the BSAS (9) or monitoring using peripheral nerve stimulation (train-of-four (TOF) (10)) or other devices such as accelerometry or electromyography.
As opposed to their use in the operating room where the interest of the monitoring is proven, there are discrepancy between studies on whether it is useful to monitor NMBAs in the ICU. For instance, Strange et al. did not observe any advantage of the use of a protocol of NMBAs administration (11), and Baumann et al. came to the same conclusions. However, more recently (12), Hraeich et al. found that the monitoring of NMBAs dosage guided by the TOF allowed to significantly reduce the dose administered during ADRS (13).
Thus, in the ICU, although guidelines recommend to monitor NMBAs administration (8), the level of evidence regarding the interest of monitoring and the device to use for such a monitoring is low.
The investigators propose to conduct a prospective multicentric observational study to describe the current practice in the use of NMBAs in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. As a primary objective the investigators will describe the prevalence of NMBAs use in the ICU. As a secondary objective, the investigator will investigate the impact of protocol and/or monitoring devices of NMBAs on the dose administered and clinical outcome endpoints, such as in-ICU mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation or acquired neuromyopathy or other complications of NMBAs.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Argenteuil, France, 95100
- CH D'argenteuil
-
Le Chesnay, France, 78157
- CH de Versailles
-
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94270
- CHU Kremlin-Bicêtre
-
Le Mans, France, 72037
- CH Le mans
-
Nantes, France, 44000
- CHU Nantes
-
Nîmes, France
- CHU Nîmes
-
Orléans, France
- CHR Orléans
-
Paris, France
- Chu La Pitie Salpetriere
-
Pontoise, France, 95303
- CH de Pontoise
-
Tours, France, 37044
- CHRU Bretonneau
-
la Roche sur Yon, France, 85925
- CHD Les Oudairies
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion criteria
- Adult Patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit
- Patient under invasive mechanical ventilation
- Administration of at least a single dose of neuromuscular blocking agent
Exclusion criteria :
- Administration of a single dose of Succinylcholine or Rocuronium for a rapid-sequence intubation
- Moribund patient whose life expectancy is less than 24 hours
- Patient under 18 years old
- Patient under legal guardianship.
- Pregnant women
- Patient already included previously in the study
- Absence of health insurance in France
- Neuromuscular blocking agent administered outside the ICU (i.e. in the operating room)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Neuromuscular blockade
Patients who will receive neuromuscular blockade during their ICU length stay will be follow until day 28 or their hospital discharge.
|
Patient who will receive neuromuscular blockade will be follow during their ICU lenght stay.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of patients who receive neuromuscular blockade
Time Frame: ICU Length stay (usually 7 days)
|
Proportion between patients who receive neuromuscular blockade and patients hospitalized in ICU and under mechanical ventilation
|
ICU Length stay (usually 7 days)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Indications of neuromuscular blockade
Time Frame: ICU Length stay (usually 7 days)
|
Description of indications for neuromuscular blockade
|
ICU Length stay (usually 7 days)
|
|
Monitoring of neuromuscular blockade
Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days)
|
Proportion of patients in whom neuromuscular blockade was monitored
|
ICU Discharge (usually 7 days)
|
|
Neuromuscular blocking agents administered dose
Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days)
|
Total dose and duration of NMBAs
|
ICU Discharge (usually 7 days)
|
|
Tolerance of neuromuscular blocking agents
Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days)
|
Acquired ICU weakness, pressure ulcer, ventilator associated pneumonia, other potential side effects neuromuscular blocking agents
|
ICU Discharge (usually 7 days)
|
|
Number of tracheostomy
Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days)
|
Proportion of patients who received tracheostomy during their ICU stay
|
ICU Discharge (usually 7 days)
|
|
Duration of ICU stay
Time Frame: ICU Discharge (usually 7 days)
|
Duration of ICU stay
|
ICU Discharge (usually 7 days)
|
|
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: Time from intubation to successfull extubation (usually 5 days)
|
Duration of mechanical ventilation
|
Time from intubation to successfull extubation (usually 5 days)
|
|
ICU Mortality
Time Frame: Time of ICU discharge (usually 7 days)
|
Proportion of patients dead during their ICU length stay
|
Time of ICU discharge (usually 7 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. Erratum In: JAMA. 2016 Jul 19;316(3):350. JAMA. 2016 Jul 19;316(3):350.
- Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, Constantin JM, Courant P, Lefrant JY, Guerin C, Prat G, Morange S, Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372.
- Arroliga A, Frutos-Vivar F, Hall J, Esteban A, Apezteguia C, Soto L, Anzueto A; International Mechanical Ventilation Study Group. Use of sedatives and neuromuscular blockers in a cohort of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):496-506. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.496.
- Arroliga AC, Thompson BT, Ancukiewicz M, Gonzales JP, Guntupalli KK, Park PK, Wiedemann HP, Anzueto A; Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Use of sedatives, opioids, and neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1083-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E3181653895.
- Lascarrou JB, Le Gouge A, Dimet J, Lacherade JC, Martin-Lefevre L, Fiancette M, Vinatier I, Lebert C, Bachoumas K, Yehia A, Lagarrigue MH, Colin G, Reignier J. Neuromuscular blockade during therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: observational study of neurological and infectious outcomes. Resuscitation. 2014 Sep;85(9):1257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-A01378-49
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Critical Care
-
NCT07510776RecruitingCritical Illness | Critical Care | Critical Care, Intensive Care | Critical Care Medicine | Recovery Outcomes
-
NCT07491731TerminatedCritical Care, Intensive Care
-
NCT02602782CompletedCritical Care, Intensive Care
-
NCT06756542RecruitingCritical Care | Intensive Care Medicine
-
NCT03920501Active, not recruitingCritical Care | Intensive Care Unit
-
NCT06390605Not yet recruiting
-
NCT01785966Completed
-
NCT07251530RecruitingCritical Care, Intensive Care
-
NCT05960994CompletedTelemedicine | Critical Care | Intensive Care Units
Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
-
NCT07567768Not yet recruitingARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
-
NCT06238219RecruitingNeuromuscular Monitoring | Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
-
NCT03585348CompletedNeuromuscular Blockade | Residual Curarisation, Postoperative | Surgery Under General Anaesthesia
-
NCT01181349Completed
-
NCT03086915CompletedNeuromuscular Blockade
-
NCT03643913Completed
-
NCT02797860Completed
-
NCT02553629Completed