Vitamin C Supplementation Intervention

February 17, 2021 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Vitamin C Supplementation Intervention for Patients With Heart Failure-A Pilot Study

This study is to test a low-cost, simple vitamin C supplementation intervention, that is, comparing placebo to 500 mg/day vitamin C and 1 gram/day vitamin C daily to assess feasibility and acceptability of vitamin C supplementation and effects on serum vitamin C level, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), symptom burden, oxidative stress, and cardiac function.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will address feasibility from the perspective of being able to: a) to detect significant differences in the serum vitamin C level after supplementation (3 months) between the intervention groups and the control group, b) to detect significant differences in health related quality of life (HRQOL), symptom burden, oxidative stress, and cardiac function after vitamin C supplementation (3 months) between the intervention groups and the control group.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27517
        • UNCH Meadowmont Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patents recruited will have a diagnosis of chronic HF, either preserved or reduced ejection fraction. The diagnosis and etiology of chronic HF will be confirmed by a HF cardiologist using established criteria.

Other criteria:

  • have undergone evaluation of HF and optimization of medical therapy,
  • vitamin C supplementation <500 mg/day
  • have not been referred for heart transplantation,
  • able to read and speak English,
  • >1 month from any inpatient hospitalization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of renal stones or renal disease (serum creatinine >1.5,
  • history of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD) and cognitive impairment that precludes giving informed consent or ability to follow protocol instructions
  • pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention 1
Vitamin C 500 mg taken daily for 3 months
Dietary supplement: Vitamin C 500 mg
500 mg tablet taken orally with one meal daily
Other Names:
  • L-Ascorbic acid
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention 2
Vitamin C 1000 mg taken daily for 3 months
Dietary supplement: Vitamin C 1000 mg
1000 mg tablet taken orally with one meal daily
Other Names:
  • L-Ascorbic acid
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control
Placebo tablets taken daily for 3 months
Other: Placebo
1 tablet taken orally with one meal daily
Other Names:
  • Sugar pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum Vitamin C Level at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
The ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) used to detect and quantify Vitamin C in serum
Baseline
Serum Vitamin C Level at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3
The ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) used to detect and quantify Vitamin C in serum
Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health Related Quality of Life Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment
Health related quality of life is measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLHFQ). The MLHFQ is a patient-reported outcome to measure the patient's perceptions of the influence of heart failure on physical and emotional aspects of life. The questionnaire has 21 items to assess the impact of frequent physical symptoms of heart failure and the effects of heart failure on physical and emotional functions. The response scale for all 21 items on the MLHFQ is based on a 6-point (from 0 to 5). Scores are summed to a range of 0-105, in which with higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.
Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment
Total MSAS-HF Score
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment
Symptom burden is measured using items from the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Heart Failure (MSAS-HF). The MSAS-HF is an 8-item questionnaire to measure HF symptoms experienced by patients with HF. Patients will be first asked if the symptom was present during the previous 7 days. If present, three characteristics of each symptom will be rated: frequency of symptom, severity of symptom, and degree of symptom distress. Frequency is rated on a scale from 0 to 5 (1=no symptom to 5=all the time), severity rated on a scale from 0 to 5 (0=not at all to 5=extremely) and distress rated on a scale from 0 to 5 (0=not at all to 5=extremely). Burden score for each symptom can range from 0 (no burden) to 4 (greatest symptom frequency, severity, and distress). The total MAS-HF scores are summed to a range of 0-180, with higher scores indicating higher symptom burden. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.
Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment
Cardiac Function
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment
The MindWare Mobile impedance cardiograph (model number 50-2303-00) used to measure participant's cardiac function using the parameter of cardiac output. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.
Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment
Oxidative Stress
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment
The ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) used to detect and quantify 8-iso-PGF2a isoprostane in serum to reflect oxidative stress. Measured at Baseline and Month 3.
Baseline and up to 3 months after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jia-Rong Wu, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 14, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 16, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 25, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 17, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 17-1809
  • T32NR007091 (NIH)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial will be shared, after de-identification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication from this trial.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Vitamin C 500 mg

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings