Comparison of Cosmesis, Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
Comparison of Cosmesis, Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Robot Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Bening Gynecologic Disorders: a Prospective Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Sariyer
-
Istanbul, Sariyer, Turkey, 34457
- Acibadem Maslak Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a diagnosis of being gynecologic disorders
- Patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic surgery
- Patients undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic surgery
- Patients undergoing surgery in our hospital by the same surgeon
- Patients willing to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Malignancy
- Requirement of emergency procedure
- Pregnancy
- Visible previous abdominal scars or keloid
- Inability of patient to tolerate Trendelenburg position or pneumoperitoneum
- Patients undergoing surgery by another surgeon or in an another hospital
- Mental impairment that would preclude giving informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Robot assisted laparoscopic surgery
This group will be consisted of patients that will undergo robot assisted laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disorders
|
Patients that will undergo robot assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disorders will answer 4 questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction, quality of life and cosmesis
|
|
Conventional laparoscopic surgery
This group will be consisted of patients that will undergo conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disorders
|
Patients that will undergo robot assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disorders will answer 4 questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction, quality of life and cosmesis
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-perceived cosmesis
Time Frame: 6 months after the surgery
|
The primary outcome is to evaluate patient's satisfaction about their laparoscopic incision scars 6 months after the surgery.
6 months after the surgery the patients will be called and will be informed about the trial.
After confirming that the questionnaires can be sent to them by e-mail, questionnaires will be sent to the patients.
BIQ (body image questionnaire) multiple choice questionnaire to evaluate their scar will be sent to the patients 6 months after the surgery.
Patients who have not completed the questionnaires will be called for reminders after 1 week.
Patients will be expected to complete the questionnaires completely and accurately.
|
6 months after the surgery
|
|
Patient and observer scar assessment
Time Frame: 6 months after the surgery
|
The primary outcome is to evaluate patient's satisfaction about their laparoscopic incision scars 6 months after the surgery.
6 months after the surgery the patients will be called and will be informed about our trial.
After confirming that the questionnaires can be sent to them by e-mail, questionnaires will be sent to the patients.
POSAS (the patient and observer scar assessment scale) multiple choice questionnaires to evaluate their scar will be sent to the patients 6 months after the surgery.
Patients who have not completed the questionnaires will be called for reminders after 1 week.
Patients will be expected to complete the questionnaires completely and accurately.
|
6 months after the surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months after the surgery
|
To compare patient-reported satisfaction using a scale called visual analogue scale (VAS) will be send to the patients via e-mail.
This is a 100-mm long scale with adjectival descriptions at both end positions.
There will be a statement explaining what was intended to measure.
Participants will be asked to mark the VAS 6 months after the surgery.
On this scale 0 representing the worst and 10 the best expected appearance of their scars.
|
6 months after the surgery
|
|
Quality of life after robot assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery
Time Frame: 6 months after the surgery
|
Quality of life will be measured using SF-12 (short form 12) health questionnaire.
This is a 12-Item Short-form Health Survey.
6 months after the surgery the patients will be called and will be informed about our trial.
After confirming that the questionnaire can be sent to them by e-mail, questionnaire will be sent to the patients.
Patients who have not completed the questionnaires will be called for reminders after 1 week.
Patients will be expected to complete the questionnaires completely and accurately.
|
6 months after the surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Mete Gungor, MD,Prof., Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Van Loey NE, Van Son MJ. Psychopathology and psychological problems in patients with burn scars: epidemiology and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(4):245-72. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200304040-00004.
- Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S, Abbou CC, Eypasch E, Caballero MG, Lumsden MA, Millat B, Monson JR, Nilsson G, Pointner R, Schwenk W, Shamiyeh A, Szold A, Targarona E, Ure B, Neugebauer E; European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):879-97. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9263-x. Epub 2004 Apr 27.
- Corrado G, Calagna G, Cutillo G, Insinga S, Mancini E, Baiocco E, Zampa A, Bufalo A, Perino A, Vizza E. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Cosmetic Outcomes of the Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Jan;28(1):194-199. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001130.
- Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D, Sobolewski C. Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ATADEK-2018/8
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
NCT07378215RecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-Life
-
NCT04239183UnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
NCT02901639UnknownImproving Quality of Life
-
NCT04761367CompletedImprove Quality of Life
-
NCT05722249CompletedProfessional Quality of Life
-
NCT01784497CompletedHealth Related Quality of Life
-
NCT01269489UnknownHealth-related Quality of Life
-
NCT01247636CompletedHealth-Related Quality of Life
-
NCT06014671CompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life of
Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic surgery
-
NCT04559087Unknown
-
NCT03426514Recruiting
-
NCT03601234UnknownGastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
-
NCT01862562Unknown
-
NCT02327481Completed
-
NCT04010006Enrolling by invitationStomach Neoplasms
-
NCT03318185UnknownLaparoscopic Surgery
-
NCT06109753CompletedMusculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions
-
NCT03151733CompletedLaparoscopic Colorectal Surgery