The Trans-cutaneous Effects on Physiological Tremor Entertainment During tACS

August 21, 2019 updated by: Myles Mc Laughlin, KU Leuven
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation method that works by passing alternating electric current between electrodes where at least one of them is attached to the head. This has been shown to have effects on the motor system, cognition and behavior. The exact mechanism by which tACS causes such effects is not fully understood. Some studies suggests a contribution from the stimulated peripheral nerves present in the scalp rather than direct brain effects. To test this hypothesis two arms will be done. First, 12 subjects (arm 1) will be stimulated using focused 4x1 montage with gel-filled cup-electrodes over the motor cortex and the effects will be compared between anesthetized and non-anesthetized scalp. The effects of anesthetizing the scalp will be tested on three different stimulation amplitudes off (0 mA), low (0.5 mA) and high (2.5 mA). Then, 10 subjects (arm 2) will be stimulated over the contralateral arm to exclude any direct brain stimulation effects and to test if peripheral nerve stimulation can entrain the tremor. Three outcome measurements will be measured during the experiments which are: tremor entrainment, sensation intensity and sensation threshold.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • KU Leuven

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Above 18
  • Signed informed consents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • History of Epilepsy
  • Family history of Epilepsy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Head stimulation
Each subject will be stimulated at two different days. One day with the presence of topical anesthetic cream on the scalp above the MC and in the other day with absence of the anesthetic cream. Stimulation frequency is set similar to that of the tremor. Three stimulation amplitudes will be tested (0 mA, 0.5 mA and 2.5 mA -reduced if not uncomfortable). A set of 4*1 gel-filled cup-electrodes is placed over each of motor cortex. Each subject follows three sessions of 12 min length each day. During each session the tremor is measured while interleaving between low amplitude stimulation, high amplitude stimulation and No stimulation. By the end of each session we get 3 min of Low amplitude stimulation, 3 min of high amplitude stimulation and 6 min of No stimulation.
Device: tACS at tremor frequency
tACS applied between the stimulation electrodes at tremor frequency
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm stimulation
Each subject will be stimulated on only one day. Stimulation frequency is set similar to that of the tremor. Three stimulation amplitudes will be tested (0 mA, 0.5 mA and 2.5 mA -reduced if not uncomfortable). A set of 2*1 gel-filled cup-electrodes is placed over the contralateral arm. Each subject follows three sessions of 12 min length. During each session the tremor is measured while interleaving between low amplitude stimulation, high amplitude stimulation and No stimulation. By the end of each session we get 3 min of Low amplitude stimulation, 3 min of high amplitude stimulation and 6 min of No stimulation.
Device: tACS at tremor frequency
tACS applied between the stimulation electrodes at tremor frequency

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in tremor-stimulation phase entrainment- Session 1
Time Frame: During session one of 12 minutes length (6 minutes with stimulation ON and 6 minutes with stimulation OFF)
phase locking value was calculated between the tremor signal measured using accelerometer and the stimulation signal
During session one of 12 minutes length (6 minutes with stimulation ON and 6 minutes with stimulation OFF)
Change in tremor-stimulation phase entrainment- Session 2
Time Frame: During session two of 12 minutes length (6 minutes with stimulation ON and 6 minutes with stimulation OFF)
phase locking value was calculated between the tremor signal measured using accelerometer and the stimulation signal
During session two of 12 minutes length (6 minutes with stimulation ON and 6 minutes with stimulation OFF)
Change in tremor-stimulation phase entrainment- Session 3
Time Frame: During session three of 12 minutes length (6 minutes with stimulation ON and 6 minutes with stimulation OFF)
phase locking value was calculated between the tremor signal measured using accelerometer and the stimulation signal
During session three of 12 minutes length (6 minutes with stimulation ON and 6 minutes with stimulation OFF)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensation rating
Time Frame: Measured up to 5 minutes before the start of the stimulation sessions and lasts for 10 seconds of stimulation after which the subject gives the rating
The subject is asked to rate the sensation intensity during the stimulation at each stimulation amplitude using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10. Zero means the subject doesn't feel the stimulation and the number starts to increase as the sensation perception intensity increases to reach 10 if the subject feels it painful.
Measured up to 5 minutes before the start of the stimulation sessions and lasts for 10 seconds of stimulation after which the subject gives the rating
Sensation threshold
Time Frame: Measured 3 minutes before the start of the stimulation sessions and lasts up to 2 minutes. Stimulation at each amplitude lasts for 10 seconds
Stimulation amplitude at which the subject starts to feel the stimulation. Stimulation starts with 0 mA amplitude and then increased gradually until stimulation is perceived (or reaching maximum amplitude).
Measured 3 minutes before the start of the stimulation sessions and lasts up to 2 minutes. Stimulation at each amplitude lasts for 10 seconds

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
KU Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 20, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 16, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 16, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • S57869-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tremor, Limb

Clinical Trials on tACS at tremor frequency

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings