Trial of Vision Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia (VT-IXT)

March 4, 2025 updated by: Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University

A Pilot Randomized Trial Evaluating Short-Term Effectiveness of Vision Therapy in Children With Intermittent Exotropia

The main objective of this randomized trial comparing vision therapy to observation is to determine the short-term effectiveness of vision therapy on distance intermittent exotropia control. The results will help determine whether to proceed to a full-scale, long-term randomized trial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Vision therapy (VT) is a commonly prescribed treatment for children with intermittent exotropia (IXT). The effectiveness of VT as a treatment modality for children with IXT is unknown because previous studies have largely limited observational or retrospective case series without comparison groups. The objective of this multi-centered pilot randomized trial of VT for IXT compared to observation is to 1) determine the short-term effectiveness of VT on distance intermittent exotropia and 2) determine the feasibility of recruitment and retention of children aged 8 to 16 years old with IXT to participate in a randomized trial of 20 weeks of in-office VT. The results of this trial will provide the needed information to plan and conduct a large-scale randomized trial to determine short-term and long-term effectiveness of VT for IXT in children, with the full-scale randomized trial helping to fill in the gaps in scientific knowledge concerning VT as a treatment for IXT.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alabama in Birmingham
        • Contact:
    • California
      • Fullerton, California, United States, 92831
        • Recruiting
        • Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University
        • Contact:
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Recruiting
        • Stanford University
        • Contact:
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Recruiting
        • Ohio State University
        • Contact:
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19141
        • Recruiting
        • Salus University
        • Contact:
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38104
        • Recruiting
        • Southern College of Optometry
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Major Inclusion Criteria-

  • Age 8 - 16 years

  • Intermittent exotropia meeting all of the following:

    • Distance exodeviation of 15∆ to 35∆ by prism alternating cover test (PACT)
    • IXT, exophoria, or orthophoria at near
    • Near exodeviation that does not exceed the distance exodeviation by more than 10∆
    • Mean distance control score of 2 points or more with at least one measure being 3 points or higher
    • Mean near control score less than 5 points
  • Random dot stereopsis of 200" or better on Preschool Randot Stereotest
  • Willingness to accept randomization and no plan to relocate in the next 6 months

Major Exclusion Criteria-

  • Treatment for IXT or amblyopia (other than refractive correction) within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Office-based vision therapy for IXT within 6 months prior to enrollment
  • Prior office-based vision therapy for IXT of ≥10 sessions
  • Prior strabismus, intraocular, or refractive surgery (including BOTOX injection)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Vision Therapy
Participants will receive 20 consecutive weeks of office-based vision therapy with home therapy.
Other: Vision Therapy
20 consecutive weeks of office-based vision therapy with home therapy that aim to improve the participant's vergence skills, accommodative skills, and sensory fusion.
Other Names:
  • Orthoptics
No Intervention: Observation
Participants will receive no treatment for IXT is received during the study unless one of the deterioration criteria is met.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Distance Control Score
Time Frame: 21 weeks
The primary analysis will be an intent-to-treat comparison of mean distance control score, determine by the intermittent exotropia office control scale, at outcome using an analysis of covariance model, which will adjust for baseline distance control. The intermittent exotropia office control scale grades the control on a scale of 0 (best control; phoria) to 5 (worst control; constant exotropia).
21 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
No Spontaneous Tropia
Time Frame: 21 weeks
The proportion of participants with no spontaneous tropia at outcome will be compared between treatment groups.No spontaneous tropia is defined as control score of 2 or less on all three assessments of control at distance and near and no exotropia lasting more than 5 seconds throughout the examination.
21 weeks
Change in Distance Control
Time Frame: 21 weeks
The proportion of participants with >= 1 point change in control and >= 2 points change in control will be compared between treatment groups.
21 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Vergence and Accommodative Measures
Time Frame: 21 weeks
The near point of convergence, positive and negative fusional vergence ranges at distance and near, vergence facility, accommodative amplitude, and accommodative facility at outcome will be compared between treatment groups adjusting for the corresponding baseline value. The analysis will be completed separately for each vergence and accommodative measures.
21 weeks
Suppression Status
Time Frame: 21 weeks
Suppression status will be compared at outcome between treatment groups, adjusting for baseline suppression status. Suppression status when the participant's eyes are in tropic position will be assessed using the suppression scale ranging from 0 (negligible suppression) to 4 (dense suppression).
21 weeks
Objective Eye Movement Recordings
Time Frame: 21 weeks
Frequency of intermittent exotropia by objective eye movement recordings will be compared between treatment groups.
21 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Stanford University
Ohio State University
Case Western Reserve University
Salus University
Southern College of Optometry
American Academy of Optometry

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Angela Chen, OD, MS, Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 4, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20-08

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intermittent Exotropia

Clinical Trials on Vision Therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings