Inspiratory Muscle Training in COVID-19 Patients (ADDIMTCOVID)

September 13, 2023 updated by: Vinicius Zacarias Maldaner da silva, Escola Superior de Ciencias da Saude

Adjunctive Inspiratory Muscle Training for Patients With COVID-19

This study aims to investigate whether adjunctive inspiratory muscle training (IMT) can enhance the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with COVID-19. 120 patients will be randomized into an interventional group (PR plus IMT) and a control group (sham IMT plus PR). Improvement in quality of life, peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope will be defined as a primary outcome. Maximal inspiratory pressure, inspiratory muscle endurance, pulmonary function testing, severity of fatigue, cost-effectiveness and six minute walk test will be defined as the secondary outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
138

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • DF
      • Brasilia, DF, Brazil, 700000
        • Secretaria de Saúde do Distrito Federal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

To be eligible, participants must be:

  • over 18 years of age
  • confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis
  • Individuals that required hospitalization and either i) non-invasive respiratory support (CPAP, high-flow oxygen catheter, non-breathing oxygen mask, or ii) invasive mechanical ventilation within three months of study recruitment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Dependence on others to perform activities of daily living during the month prior to the current ICU admission (gait aids are acceptable)
  • documented cognitive impairment
  • Proven or suspected spinal cord injury, or other neuromuscular diseases that will result in a permanent or prolonged weakness (not including ICU acquired weakness)
  • Severe neurological disease
  • Death is deemed inevitable as a result of the current illness and either the patient or treating clinical or substitute decision-maker are not committed to full active treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention Group
The training volume will be 24 sessions. Training frequency will be 3 sessions per week. Duration of training sessions will be around 60min. Patients will perform endurance training or interval training at moderate to high intensities. IMT in both groups will be performed using the PowerBreathe KHP2 device (POWERbreatheKHP2, HaB, International, Southam, UK). Training intensity in the intervention group will be set initially at a load of 50% of patients' maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (MIP). This initial load will be continuously and gradually increased to the highest tolerable intensity during each of the supervised sessions.
Device: inspiratory muscle traiing
The patients are encouraged to inhale against a load to increase the inspiratory muscle strength and endurance
Other Names:
  • tapered flow resistive loading
Active Comparator: Control group
The training volume will be 24 sessions. Training frequency will be 3 sessions per week. Duration of training sessions will be around 60min. Patients will perform endurance training or interval training at moderate to high intensities. Sham IMT will be performed using the PowerBreathe KHP2 device (POWERbreatheKHP2, HaB, International, Southam, UK). Training intensity in the control group will be set at 10% baseline PImax and will be not modified throughout the intervention period.
Device: inspiratory muscle traiing
The patients are encouraged to inhale against a load to increase the inspiratory muscle strength and endurance
Other Names:
  • tapered flow resistive loading

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Measurements
Time Frame: change from baseline in Peak VO2, VE/VCO2 slope and VAT at 8 weeks and 6 months
Peak VO2 is a measurement of oxygen consumption rate during exercise (milliliters of oxygen per minute). It is calculated by continuous measurement of oxygen consumed during exercise while patients breath through a mask/tube. To account for variability in patient size, the oxygen consumption is divided by patient body weight.The VE/VCO2 slope is calculated as the ratio of minute ventilation (VE) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2). Because these measurements share the same units, the resultant ratio is unitless.The ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) will be determined by the V-slope method.
change from baseline in Peak VO2, VE/VCO2 slope and VAT at 8 weeks and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
severity of fatigue
Time Frame: change from baseline in FSS score at 8 weeks and 6 months
Fatigue severity scale (FSS) is a questionnaire consisting of 9 questions showing the degree of fatigue of patients. An average score of less than 2.8 indicates no fatigue, and more than 6.1 indicates chronic fatigue syndrome
change from baseline in FSS score at 8 weeks and 6 months
Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: Change from baseline in HADS score at 8 weeks and 6 months
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) is a 14-item questionnaire for screening anxiety (7 items) and depression (7 items). Each item is scored from 0-3 (a 4-point severity scale). Highest anxiety or depression score is 21. Patients are defined as having anxiety or depression or both if the score is 8 or more in the each subscale.
Change from baseline in HADS score at 8 weeks and 6 months
incremental cost-utility ratio
Time Frame: 6 months
Utility will be measured by Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALYs) as estimated from responses to the Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D 5L) health-related quality of life questionnaire. The questionnaire focuses on 5 dimensions: mobility, personal autonomy, current activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each of these dimensions, 5 answers are possible.
6 months
Health- related quality of life
Time Frame: change from baseline in EQ-5D score at 8 weeks and 6 months
EQ-5D is a standardized tool for the assessment of quality of life in 5 different dimensions (Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression). Possible scores range from 1 (No problem) to 3 (Extreme problems) and each dimension are evaluated individually
change from baseline in EQ-5D score at 8 weeks and 6 months
Pulmonary function testing
Time Frame: change from baseline in FEV1 and FVC in Liters at 8 weeks and 6 months.
Spirometry will be performed with a spirometer (Microlab 3.500; CareFusion, Yorba Linda, CA, USA). Three forced expiration maneuvers will be performed for validity and reproducibility purposes according to ATS/ERS criteria, with patients sitting, in a room with controlled temperature, ambient pressure, and relative humidity. The following variables will be analyzed: (a) forced vital capacity (FVC, L), (b) forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1, L).
change from baseline in FEV1 and FVC in Liters at 8 weeks and 6 months.
Dyspnea
Time Frame: change from baseline in mMRC score at 8 weeks and 6 months
The modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC). A score from 0-4 is used to classify the impact of dyspnea on physical function in patients with respiratory limitations. 0 represents a person who suffers from dyspnea only with strenuous exercise. 4 represents a person who are to breathless to leave the house, or breathless when dressing/undressing.
change from baseline in mMRC score at 8 weeks and 6 months
Respiratory muscle strength
Time Frame: change from baseline in MIP and MEP at 8 weeks and 6 months
Pulmonary function test with Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) measurements
change from baseline in MIP and MEP at 8 weeks and 6 months
Postural Control
Time Frame: change from baseline in Postural stability test and fall risk test at 8 weeks
postural control assessed by stabilometry test
change from baseline in Postural stability test and fall risk test at 8 weeks
isometric knee extension strength
Time Frame: change from baseline in Nm at 8 weeks
peripheral muscle stregnth assessed by isometric load dynamometer
change from baseline in Nm at 8 weeks
displacement
Time Frame: change from baseline in CM2 at 8 weeks
outcomes assessed by baropodometry
change from baseline in CM2 at 8 weeks
trajectory
Time Frame: change from baseline in CM2 at 8 weeks
outcome assessed by baropodometry
change from baseline in CM2 at 8 weeks
isometric knee flexion strength
Time Frame: change from baseline in Nm at 8 weeks
peripheral muscle stregnth assessed by isometric load dynamometer
change from baseline in Nm at 8 weeks
dynamic balance
Time Frame: change from baseline in Total score at 8 weeks
dynamic balance assessed by Mini-BEST testing
change from baseline in Total score at 8 weeks
Sit to Stand Test
Time Frame: change from baseline in repetitions at 8 weeks
exercise capacity assessed by Sit to Stand test
change from baseline in repetitions at 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Escola Superior de Ciencias da Saude

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Brasilia
JBS/CNPq

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CNPQ092020

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on inspiratory muscle traiing

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings