Using Polar Unite Fitness Watch to Improve Cognition for T2DM Patients

October 26, 2020 updated by: University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

Feasibility Testing a Randomized Controlled Trial of an mHealth-enhanced Exercise Program to Improve Cognition for T2DM Patients

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) impairs the brain, leading to cognitive dysfunction, which carries substantial lifetime consequences. This highlights an urgent need to find effective therapeutic strategies to improve cognitive function among those with T2DM. Aerobic exercise enhances cognitive function among healthy subjects through increased release of BDNF. BDNF supports survival of existing neurons and promotes growth of new neurons and synapses. Emerging evidence suggests that reduced BDNF levels may exacerbate cognitive dysfunction associated with T2DM. Compared to drug delivery of BDNF, aerobic exercise is a low-cost, safe, and easily accessible path to increasing endogenous BDNF levels. One critical genetic variant that affects BDNF secretion and cognition is the BDNF Val66Met variant, which is a common missense polymorphism that results in a valine (Val) to methionine (Met) substitution at codon 66 located in exon IX of the BDNF gene. The Met allele alters intracellular processing, trafficking, packaging of pro-BDNF, and consequently interferes with the activity-dependent secretion of mature BDNF among Met carriers. In addition, previous research reported an influence of the Val66Met variant on the methylation level of the surrounding region. Carrying a G nucleotide (i.e., Val allele) will have an additional CpG site, and Val/Val homozygotes demonstrated a significant increase in methylation levels of four nearby CpG sites compared to Val/Met heterozygotes and Met/Met homozygotes. Because high BDNF gene methylation is associated with reduced BDNF mRNA levels, this may result in lower BDNF levels among Val/Val carriers. However, the transcription of promoter IV can be initiated by exercise, suggesting that epigenetic modulation of BDNF gene expression may be achieved by exercise. It is plausible that exercise may partly reverse transcriptional repression through dynamic DNA demethylation, but the interaction between DNA demethylation and Val homozygosity may be different from that in Met/Met and in Val/Met carriers, which could explain interpersonal differences in cognitive outcomes among these carriers following exercise training. So far, the evidence on the interplay of the Val66Met polymorphism, DNA methylation, and exercise on cognition among individuals with T2DM is still lacking. A total of 42 participants with T2DM will be randomized 2:1 to receive aerobic exercise intervention (n=28) or attention control (n=14) for 3 months. Both groups will receive weekly phone calls during the intervention and standard printed education materials regarding diabetes self-management. In addition to these interventions, the aerobic exercise group (i.e., experimental group) will also perform home-based walking exercise, while the attention control group will perform home-based stretching exercise. Trained students will monitor the exercise sessions for both groups at the Connected Health Platform (hereafter referred to as "platform"). Blood samples will be collected at baseline and three months. Outcomes of interest include post-intervention changes in plasma BDNF levels, BDNF DNA methylation executive function, memory, and processing speed. The study will evaluate the feasibility of the home-based exercise intervention. The study will also evaluate preliminary effectiveness of the supervised exercise program on of the exercise program on BDNF DNA demethylation. An exploratory aim is to explore the association of DNA demethylation with plasma BDNF levels and cognition.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Tingting Liu, PhD
  • Phone Number: 4795755038
  • Email: tl023@uark.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants eligible for this study will be physically inactive adults with no major chronic physical or mental disorders but classified as having low physical activity levels determined by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Participants must have a documented medical diagnosis of T2DM and must be receiving diabetes care at the time of enrollment. Participants must be English-speaking and are able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria include uncontrolled hypertension with resting blood pressure of 160/90 mmHg or higher, having symptoms of coronary ischemia such as chest pain and severe shortness of breath during activities of daily living, loss of consciousness/fainting for any reason, or having any other medical or physical conditions that may interfere with exercise participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Aerobic exercise group
Aerobic exercise will be measured with a Polar United fitness watch. Heart rate during exercise will be measured using a Polar United fitness watch, which has been validated for monitoring moderate and high intensity physical activity.
Behavioral: Aerobic exercise program
A randomized controlled trial will be used to test the feasibility of a home-based exercise program to improve BDNF DNA demethylation among individuals with T2DM. A total of 42 participants will be randomized 2:1 to receive aerobic exercise intervention (n=28) or attention control (n=14) for 3 months. This ratio is used to offset an anticipated attrition imbalance across groups.
Placebo Comparator: Attention control group
The time-equivalent, stretching movements will serve as the placebo exercise condition in this proposed study. Previous research has shown that stretching could reduce attrition and patient dissatisfaction and better ensure allocation concealment. Following baseline measures, a student will demonstrate the use of a Polar United fitness watch and stretching movements via zoom from week 3 to week 5. Starting on week 3, participants will perform the prescribed stretching exercise 3 times a week, maintaining heart rate below 40% of heart rate reserve during exercise.
Behavioral: Stretching exercise
stretching exercise

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
BDNF DNA demethylation in percentage
Time Frame: Three months
Three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plasma BDNF levels in ng
Time Frame: Three months
Three months
Executive function
Time Frame: Three months
Executive function will be measured by the Dimensional Change Card Sort Test. Test-retest reliability of the test is 0.88. Convergent validity and discriminant validity is -0.51 and 0.14, respectively.
Three months
Episodic memory
Time Frame: Three months
Episodic memory will be measured by the Picture Sequence Memory Test. Test-retest reliability of the test is 0.77. Convergent validity and discriminant validity is 0.69 and -0.08, respectively.
Three months
Working memory
Time Frame: Three months
Working memory will be measured by the List Sorting Working Memory Test. Test-retest reliability of the test is 0.77. Convergent validity and discriminant validity are 0.58 and 0.30, respectively.
Three months
Processing speed
Time Frame: Three months
Processing speed will be measured by the Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test. The test takes about 3 minutes to compete. Test-retest reliability of the test is 0.72. Convergent validity and discriminant validity is 0.49 and 0.12, respectively.
Three months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 15, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2009284124

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Cognitive Dysfunction, Epigenetics, Exercise

Clinical Trials on Aerobic exercise program

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings