Increasing HCV Linkage to Care Among People Who Inject Drugs

February 5, 2024 updated by: Family Health Centers of San Diego

Does a Simplified Algorithm and Integrated HCV Care Improve Linkage to Care, Retention, and Cure Among People Who Inject Drugs? A Pragmatic Quality Improvement Randomized Controlled Trial

Our study will test the effectiveness of a simplified approach to delivering Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) care in a street-based mobile medical clinic among people who inject drugs in increasing treatment initiation, retention, and cure. Rates of HCV treatment initiation, retention, and cure will be compared between patients offered the simplified approach to delivering HCV care in a mobile medical clinic versus those who are linked to a community clinic delivering a current practice of usual care. The investigators hypothesize that the simplified approach to delivering HCV care in a street-based mobile medical clinic will result in higher treatment initiation, retention, and cure than the current practice of usual care in community clinics.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

With as many as 2.4 million Americans affected by chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), it is one of the most common blood-borne diseases in the United States. Nationwide, rates of new infections have risen dramatically among young adults in their 20s and 30s, the same cohorts most affected by the opioid epidemic, with as many as 70% of new infections related to injection drug use. Local/regional rates of new infection mirror these national surveillance findings. In San Diego, between 2011 and 2016, women aged 20-29 experienced a 62.2% increase in new HCV infections, while new infections among men aged 20-29 spiked 46.6%, with injection drug use cited as the most common form of transmission. Expanded prevalence estimates indicate a population prevalence rate for HCV of 2.0% to 2.7% in San Diego County, suggesting that approximately 65,000 to 88,000 individuals in the region are likely HCV-infected. These alarming increases in new HCV infections demand effective treatment delivered to populations that historically have been difficult to reach and are characterized by disparities in HCV screening, linkage to care, and treatment access due to a constellation of barriers to care. Advances in HCV treatment and care (e.g., the development of highly effective direct-acting antivirals--DAAs) show promise for treating these populations and have led to worldwide HCV elimination goals, as well as local/regional elimination campaigns. While the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases/Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA)'s guidelines have long been considered the gold standard for HCV diagnosis, workup, and treatment (and remain appropriate for HCV specialists, especially in complex cases of HCV infection) recent World Health Organization (WHO) HCV guidelines and published consensus statements call for implementation of streamlined and simplified algorithms for HCV care, delivered in an integrated primary care setting. They highlight that most patients, particularly younger people who inject drugs (PWID), have a low risk of cirrhosis, do not require genotyping if treated with pangenotypic regimens, and may be lost to follow-up due to overly complex, time-intensive, and costly evaluations. Furthermore, emerging evidence indicates that PWID achieve the same high cure rates as non-injection drug user patients when treated with DAAs. While research indicates that DAAs have high efficacy and safety and can now be used by primary care providers to treat HCV there are still groups, especially PWID, who experience treatment disparities due to access and treatment barriers. Limited evidence exists to support the effectiveness of expanding screening and treatment access via the use of mobile medical clinics co-located with services for PWID. Only one study to date has shown that point of care testing in a mobile medical clinic resulted in significantly higher rates of HCV infected patients being linked to HCV treatment in 30 days compared to standard phlebotomy HCV testing. Therefore, the proposed study will test the effectiveness of a simplified HCV algorithm with integrated care (including the offer of buprenorphine prescriptions and abscess care), in a street-based mobile clinic setting among PWID, in increasing treatment initiation and retention rates. Rates of HCV treatment initiation and retention will be compared between patients offered a simplified HCV care in a mobile medical clinic versus those who are linked to the current practice of usual care in community clinics.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92102
        • Family Health Centers of San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Participants will be positive HCV antibody and positive HCV RNA patients aged 18 years or older who are willing to undergo HCV treatment.

Exclusion Criteria: There are no exclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Usual Care within Community Clinics
Complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, international normalized ratio, HCV RNA, hepatitis B virus (HBV) serologies, point of care HIV test, and point of care liver fibrosis measurement. HCV genotype if required by patient's insurance for prior authorization. Care for opioid use disorder and skin infection is offered. Completion of the initial visit workup is sufficient to initiate a prior authorization request for DAAs from payers and an appointment for MAT follow-up in a community clinic if indicated. Patient coordination; authorization with insurance companies; scheduling appointments, follow-up, and ancillary support services will be conducted by a Patient Navigator. Patients are seen every 2-4 weeks for monitoring and adherence support. HCV treatment regimens are at the discretion of the treating provider in accordance with AASLD/IDSA guidelines and insurance requirements. Twelve weeks after HCV therapy completion, SVR12 HCV RNA and SVR12 CMP tests will be obtained.
Experimental: Simplified Care within a Mobile Medical Unit
Simplified Care treatment is the same as for Usual Care with the exception that it is taking place within a mobile medical clinic that is scheduled to deliver treatment in alignment with regular syringe exchange services.
Other: Simplified HCV care within a mobile medical unit
Delivers guideline-based care for HCV in a stream-lined manner on a mobile medical unit

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients who initiate HCV treatment
Time Frame: 6 months of follow-up
Initiating treatment with a Direct-Acting Antiviral (DAA)
6 months of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients who complete HCV treatment
Time Frame: 16 weeks after treatment initiation
Completing a full treatment course of 8 or 12 weeks of DAA therapy
16 weeks after treatment initiation
SVR12 rates
Time Frame: At least 12 weeks following DAA completion
Undetectable HCV RNA on or after the SVR12 time point
At least 12 weeks following DAA completion
Initiation rates for medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for Opioid Use Disorder
Time Frame: During the first 3 months of follow-up after enrollment
Attendance of at least one visit to a community clinic for treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
During the first 3 months of follow-up after enrollment
Persistent rate for MAT
Time Frame: During 6 months of follow-up after enrollment
> 3 visits for MAT
During 6 months of follow-up after enrollment
Number of patients who receive abscess care
Time Frame: During 6 months of follow-up after enrollment
Treatment for skin infection or abscess
During 6 months of follow-up after enrollment
Prevalence of engagement in care
Time Frame: During 6 months of follow-up after enrollment
The number of visits for any reason during the study period
During 6 months of follow-up after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Family Health Centers of San Diego

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 5, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GSHCV

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C

Clinical Trials on Simplified HCV care within a mobile medical unit

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings