Bowel Dysfunction After Rectal Cancer Treatment

September 26, 2023 updated by: Yolanda Ribas, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa

Prospective Evaluation of Bowel Dysfunction After Rectal Cancer Treatment

Bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment may significantly affect the quality of life. Our study aimed to estimate the incidence and characterize the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome(LARS). We performed a prospective evaluation of patients treated with anterior resection for rectal cancer at two hospitals. Assessment was performed at baseline, after neoadjuvant treatment, and 1, 6 and 12 months after bowel transit reconstruction using the following scores: Bristol scale, LARS score, MSK-BFI, FIQL, EORTC-QLQ30 and a visual analogue scale.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) refers to wide-ranging symptoms including evacuatory dysfunction, fecal urgency and incontinence. The assessment of bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment has improved since the development of the LARS score. This score has widely been used with a meta-analysis reporting a pooled prevalence of "major LARS" of 41%. However, several studies have found a large proportion of patients with major LARS in the general population without rectal cancer raising questions about the specificity of this score. Moreover, most studies on the prevalence of LARS do not include a baseline evaluation and, therefore, may not allow establishing whether the dysfunctions appeared after the treatment. Consequently, we considered that a prospective study including a baseline evaluation and multiple validated questionnaires was required. The present study aimed to estimate the incidence and characterize bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment. The results of this study will be useful to improve the preoperative information given to the patient and the shared decision-making process.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
113

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Barcelona
      • Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain, 08227
        • Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma with curative intention, with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma with curative intention, with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, total or partial excision of the mesorectum, colorectal or coloanal anastomosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • disseminated disease
  • surgery with palliative intent
  • refusal to participate in the study
  • intellectual difficulty to answer the questionnaires

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the LARS score between baseline and 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in the LARS score (Low Anterior Resection Score) between baseline and 12 months after bowel transit reconstruction (primary surgery or ileostomy closure). The LARS score is a 5-item scoring system which classifies patients into three severity categories: no LARS (0-20 points), minor LARS (21-29 points), and major LARS (30-42 points). A higher score represents worse bowel function. This score also includes a question about the impact on quality of life.
12 months
Change in the MSK-BFI between baseline and 12 months (MSK-BFI)
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument (MSK-BFI) between baseline and 12 months after bowel transit reconstruction (primary surgery or ileostomy closure). The MSK-BFI includes 18 questions with five frequency options ranging from never through to always. A total score and three subscales (frequency, diet, and urgency) can be calculated. A higher score represents better bowel function.
12 months
Change in the Bristol stool chart between baseline and 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in the Bristol stool chart between baseline and 12 months after bowel transit reconstruction (primary surgery or ileostomy closure). The Bristol stool chart shows seven categories of stool. The Bristol score was subclassified into three categories: Bristol 1-2 (hard stools), Bristol 3-4 (normal stools), and Bristol 5-7 (loose or liquid stools).
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) between baseline and 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) between baseline and 12 months after bowel transit reconstruction (primary surgery or ileostomy closure). The VAS ranges from 0 (worst bowel function) to 10 (best)
12 months
Change in the EORTC QLQ-C30 between baseline and 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality oF Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) between baseline and 12 months after bowel transit reconstruction (primary surgery or ileostomy closure). The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of patients with cancer. The global QoL scale and 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning) can be calculated. All scales range from 0 to 100. A higher score for the global health status represents a higher quality of life, and a higher score for a functional scale represents a higher / healthy level of functioning.
12 months
Change in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) between baseline and 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) between baseline and 12 months after bowel transit reconstruction (primary surgery or ileostomy closure). The FIQL score includes 29 items which form four scales: lifestyle, coping/behavior, depression/self-perception, and embarrassment. Scores range from 0 to 4 and a higher value represents a better quality of life.
12 months
Correlation of the severity of LARS with the quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months
Correlation of the severity of LARS (LARS score and MSK-BFI) with the quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
12 months
Multivariate analysis of risk factors for LARS
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessment of independent predictors of the LARS score at the 12-month visit in a multiple linear regression model. Univariate linear regression analysis was initially performed to identify the demographic, clinical and surgical factors associated with the 12-month LARS score.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Hospital Universitari MútuaTerrassa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 26, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LARS

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings