Vertebral Bone Marrow Clot for Spinal Surgery

May 25, 2026 updated by: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

The Vertebral Bone Marrow Clot as Autologous Cell-therapy and Multifunctional Bio-scaffold Targeting the Key Challenges for Spinal Fusion Surgery

Spinal fusion (SF) is a common orthopedic procedure to treat spinal diseases. Apart from fixation systems, the procedure requires bone grafting to further improve SF. Cell-based therapies as vertebral bone marrow aspirate (vBMA) with bone allograft were developed as alternative to bone autograft in SF. However, vBMA use is limited by the lack of a standardized procedure, of a structural texture and by the possibility of diffusion away from the implant site. Recently, the potential use of a new formulation of vBMA, named vBMA clot, has been described. The project aims at evaluating the clinical evidence and the biological features of vBMA clot associated to bone allograft for SF surgery, considering age and gender related differences. A randomized controlled trial will prove the efficacy of the treatment and advanced preclinical studies will improve the knowledge on vBMA clot regenerative and anti-inflammatory properties, exploring for the first time its antibacterial characteristics.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To evaluate the efficacy of autologous vBMA clot in SF procedures in patients with degenerative spine diseases, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be carried out. The study will compare patients treated with autologous vBMA clot associated to bone allograft chips versus bone allograft chips alone (standard treatment), also evaluating whether patient age and gender are associated with differences in the clinical outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
96

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • BO
      • Bologna, BO, Italy, 40136
        • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • degenerative spinal disorders (based radiological diagnosis)
  • posterior spinal stabilization ≤ 5 levels
  • age between 18-80 years at the time of surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HIV
  • HBV
  • HCV
  • coagulations disorders
  • pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • cancer
  • infections
  • previous spinal surgery
  • radio- chemotherapy
  • myeloproliferative disease
  • chronic steroid medication, thyroxin, immunodepression

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental group - vertebral bone marrow (vBMA) clot
Bone allograft chips will be obtained from Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli while vBMA will be harvested from each patient vertebral pedicle with the preparation of the site for pedicle screw insertion during spinal surgery. After the positioning of pedicle screws, the decompression of the cauda and nerve roots will be achieved with a hemilaminectomy and foraminotomy. vBMA clot associated with bone allograft chips will be opposed on the hemi-laminae and transvers process on the contralateral side of the hemilaminectomy. On the hemilaminectomy side, foramino-arthrectomy will be performed to insert the interbody fusion cage if necessary. After aspiration, the vBMA will be clotted and used for surgical procedure. vBMA clot associated to bone allograft chips will be applied on each side of the vertebra according to the number of segments to be fused.
Biological: Vertebral bone marrow (vBMA) clot
The clotted vBMA will be obtained from vertebral bone marrow aspirate.The vBMA clot contain mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), growth factors, platelet and osteogenic and anti-inflammatory mediators.
Active Comparator: Control - bone allograft chips
Bone allograft chips will be obtained from Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. In detail, conventional posterior approach for lumbar SF will be performed. After the positioning of pedicle screws, the decompression of the cauda and nerve roots will be achieved with a hemilaminectomy and foraminotomy. Bone allograft chips alone will be opposed on the hemi-laminae and transvers process on the contralateral side of the hemilaminectomy. On the hemilaminectomy side, foramino-arthrectomy will be performed to insert the interbody fusion cage if necessary.
Other: Bone allograft chips
Bone allograft chips will be obtained from Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank at IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brantigan classification
Time Frame: At baseline (day 0)
Improvement of spinal fusion rate and time in patients treated with vBMA clot associated to bone allograft chips in comparison to bone allograft chips alone, also considering age and gender differences. CT-scan and X-ray, perform pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12 months of FU, will be evaluated basing on Brantigan classification (which ranges from A to E, with E score indicating better SF rate).
At baseline (day 0)
Brantigan classification
Time Frame: 1 month
Improvement of spinal fusion rate and time in patients treated with vBMA clot associated to bone allograft chips in comparison to bone allograft chips alone, also considering age and gender differences. CT-scan and X-ray, perform pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12 months of FU, will be evaluated basing on Brantigan classification (which ranges from A to E, with E score indicating better SF rate).
1 month
Brantigan classification
Time Frame: 3 months
Improvement of spinal fusion rate and time in patients treated with vBMA clot associated to bone allograft chips in comparison to bone allograft chips alone, also considering age and gender differences. CT-scan and X-ray, perform pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12 months of FU, will be evaluated basing on Brantigan classification (which ranges from A to E, with E score indicating better SF rate).
3 months
Brantigan classification
Time Frame: 6 months
Improvement of spinal fusion rate and time in patients treated with vBMA clot associated to bone allograft chips in comparison to bone allograft chips alone, also considering age and gender differences. CT-scan and X-ray, perform pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12 months of FU, will be evaluated basing on Brantigan classification (which ranges from A to E, with E score indicating better SF rate).
6 months
Brantigan classification
Time Frame: 12 months
Improvement of spinal fusion rate and time in patients treated with vBMA clot associated to bone allograft chips in comparison to bone allograft chips alone, also considering age and gender differences. CT-scan and X-ray, perform pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12 months of FU, will be evaluated basing on Brantigan classification (which ranges from A to E, with E score indicating better SF rate).
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Score
Time Frame: At baseline (day 0)
Visual Analogue Score (which ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more severe pain)
At baseline (day 0)
Visual Analogue Score
Time Frame: 3 months
Visual Analogue Score (which ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more severe pain)
3 months
Visual Analogue Score
Time Frame: 12 months
Visual Analogue Score (which ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more severe pain)
12 months
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: At baseline (day 0)
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (which ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more severe disability)
At baseline (day 0)
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 3 months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (which ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more severe disability)
3 months
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 12 months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (which ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more severe disability)
12 months
Re-operation rate
Time Frame: At baseline (day 0)
The radiological outcome is the reduction of re-operation rate due to pseudoarthrosis that will be estimate by Brantigan classification.
At baseline (day 0)
Re-operation rate
Time Frame: 1 month
The radiological outcome is the reduction of re-operation rate due to pseudoarthrosis that will be estimate by Brantigan classification.
1 month
Re-operation rate
Time Frame: 3 month
The radiological outcome is the reduction of re-operation rate due to pseudoarthrosis that will be estimate by Brantigan classification.
3 month
Re-operation rate
Time Frame: 6 month
The radiological outcome is the reduction of re-operation rate due to pseudoarthrosis that will be estimate by Brantigan classification.
6 month
Re-operation rate
Time Frame: 12 month
The radiological outcome is the reduction of re-operation rate due to pseudoarthrosis that will be estimate by Brantigan classification.
12 month
Visual Analogue Score
Time Frame: 1 month
Visual Analogue Score (which ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more severe pain)
1 month
Visual Analogue Score
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual Analogue Score (which ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more severe pain)
6 months
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 1 month
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (which ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more severe disability)
1 month
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 6 months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (which ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more severe disability)
6 months
Short Form Health Survey 36
Time Frame: At baseline (day 0)
Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) (set of generic and coherent quality-of-life measures based on patient self-reporting outcomes)
At baseline (day 0)
Short Form Health Survey 36
Time Frame: 1 month
Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) (set of generic and coherent quality-of-life measures based on patient self-reporting outcomes)
1 month
Short Form Health Survey 36
Time Frame: 3 months
Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) (set of generic and coherent quality-of-life measures based on patient self-reporting outcomes)
3 months
Short Form Health Survey 36
Time Frame: 6 months
Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) (set of generic and coherent quality-of-life measures based on patient self-reporting outcomes)
6 months
Short Form Health Survey 36
Time Frame: 12 months
Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) (set of generic and coherent quality-of-life measures based on patient self-reporting outcomes)
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 19, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 18, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MORE_FOR_SPINE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Spine Diseases

Clinical Trials on Vertebral bone marrow (vBMA) clot

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings