The Effects of Unilateral and Bilateral Mirror Therapy on Upper Extremity Function in Early Subacute Stroke.
The Effects of Unilateral and Bilateral Mirror Therapy on Upper Extremity Function in Early Subacute Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Chia-Yi Lin, MS
- Phone Number: 523509 +886-532-6151
- Email: G04812@hch.gov.tw
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hsinchu, Taiwan, 300
- National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Unilateral stroke onset within 1 month
- The score of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is more than 24
- The score of Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE) is between 18 to 56
- The score of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is less than 3
- Willing to receive 3-5 sessions of the intervention per week, total 20 sessions consecutively
- Willing to sign informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unstable vital sign or complicating with other symptoms of neurological disease
- Auditory or visual function impairment
- Complicating with perceptual impairment (e.g., apraxia, neglect, or visual agnosia)
- Receiving botulinum toxin injection within 3 months
- Complicating with Wernicke's or Broca's aphasia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: unilateral mirror therapy (UMT)
Participants will receive 30 minutes unilateral mirror therapy and then 30 minutes conventional occupational therapy in each treatment session.
there will be 20 consecutive sessions (5 times per week, lasting 4 weeks totally)
|
The mirror box is placed on a table in the sagittal plane of the participant.
The affected upper extremity of the participant is hidden in the morror box and the unaffected upper extremity is placed symmetrically.
During the unilateral or bilateral mirror therapy, the participant is requested to execute a serial of movements and tasks and pay attention on observing the reflection of the unaffected side in the mirror simultaneously.
In the bilateral mirror therapy, the participant also has to move the affected upper extremity simultaneously; while in the unilateral mirror therapy, the participant only keeps the affected side relaxed.
|
|
Experimental: Bilateral Mirror Therapy (BMT)
Participants will receive 30 minutes bilateral mirror therapy and then 30 minutes conventional occupational therapy in each treatment session.
there will be 20 consecutive sessions (5 times per week, lasting 4 weeks totally)
|
The mirror box is placed on a table in the sagittal plane of the participant.
The affected upper extremity of the participant is hidden in the morror box and the unaffected upper extremity is placed symmetrically.
During the unilateral or bilateral mirror therapy, the participant is requested to execute a serial of movements and tasks and pay attention on observing the reflection of the unaffected side in the mirror simultaneously.
In the bilateral mirror therapy, the participant also has to move the affected upper extremity simultaneously; while in the unilateral mirror therapy, the participant only keeps the affected side relaxed.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Conventional Occupational Therapy (COT)
Participants will receive 60 minutes conventional occupational therapy in each treatment session.
there will be 20 consecutive sessions (5 times per week, lasting 4 weeks totally)
|
The mirror box is placed on a table in the sagittal plane of the participant.
The affected upper extremity of the participant is hidden in the morror box and the unaffected upper extremity is placed symmetrically.
During the unilateral or bilateral mirror therapy, the participant is requested to execute a serial of movements and tasks and pay attention on observing the reflection of the unaffected side in the mirror simultaneously.
In the bilateral mirror therapy, the participant also has to move the affected upper extremity simultaneously; while in the unilateral mirror therapy, the participant only keeps the affected side relaxed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE)
Time Frame: pre-treatment: before intervention within a week; post-treatment: after intervention within a week
|
The FMA-UE is a commonly used assessment in clinical for the extent of motor impairment of upper extremity post-stroke.
The score ranged from 0 to 66.
The psychometric properties of the FMA-UE had established, and there was also good responsiveness in the past studies.
|
pre-treatment: before intervention within a week; post-treatment: after intervention within a week
|
|
The Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer
Time Frame: pre-treatment: before intervention within a week; post-treatment: after intervention within a week
|
The Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer is a gold standard assessment tool for measuring muscle power including the grip strength, palmar pinch, and lateral pinch.
|
pre-treatment: before intervention within a week; post-treatment: after intervention within a week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: pre-treatment: before intervention within a week; post-treatment: after intervention within a week
|
The MAS is a clinical measurement for muscle spasticity.
The score is ranged from 0 to 4. The shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and fingers will be assessed.
The psychometric properties of the MAS had established in the past studies.
|
pre-treatment: before intervention within a week; post-treatment: after intervention within a week
|
|
Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI)
Time Frame: pre-treatment: before intervention within a week; post-treatment: after intervention within a week
|
The CAHAI is used for the involvement of the impairment upper extremity during the bimanual tasks.
There are 13 item and each score is ranged from 1-7.
The psychometric properties of the CAHAI had established in the past studies.
|
pre-treatment: before intervention within a week; post-treatment: after intervention within a week
|
|
Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA)
Time Frame: pre-treatment: before intervention within a week; post-treatment: after intervention within a week
|
The rNSA is developed for assessing sensory function of patients with stroke.
The reliability of rNSA was established in the past study.
|
pre-treatment: before intervention within a week; post-treatment: after intervention within a week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Chia-Yi Lin, MS, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: A rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;75(5):309-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.04.001.
- Zeng W, Guo Y, Wu G, Liu X, Fang Q. Mirror therapy for motor function of the upper extremity in patients with stroke: A meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2018 Jan 10;50(1):8-15. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2287.
- Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, Johnson J, Rossiter D, Petruckevitch A, Thompson AJ. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil. 1995 Jan;17(1):10-4. doi: 10.3109/09638289509166622.
- Meseguer-Henarejos AB, Sanchez-Meca J, Lopez-Pina JA, Carles-Hernandez R. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;54(4):576-590. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04796-7. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
- Geller D, Nilsen DM, Quinn L, Van Lew S, Bayona C, Gillen G. Home mirror therapy: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing unimanual and bimanual mirror therapy for improved arm and hand function post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Nov;44(22):6766-6774. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1973121. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
- Johnson D, Harris J, Stratford P, Richardson J. Inter-rater reliability of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(2):201-209. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161405.
- Lee, M. T., Lu, Y. Y., Wu, C. Y., Hsieh, Y. W., & Lin, K.C. (2012). A systematic review of the effects of mirror therapy in patients with stroke. Journal of Taiwan Occupational Therapy Research and Practice, 8 (2), 125-140. doi:10.6534/jtotrp.2012.8(2).125
- Lincoln, N. B., Jackson, J. M., & Adams, S. A. (1998). Reliability and revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy, 84(8), 358- 365.
- Perez-Cruzado D, Merchan-Baeza JA, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Systematic review of mirror therapy compared with conventional rehabilitation in upper extremity function in stroke survivors. Aust Occup Ther J. 2017 Apr;64(2):91-112. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12342. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
- Selles RW, Michielsen ME, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ, Hurkmans HL, Heijnen I, de Groot D, Ribbers GM. Effects of a mirror-induced visual illusion on a reaching task in stroke patients: implications for mirror therapy training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):652-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521005. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 111-168-E
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke (Subacute)
-
NCT07503522Recruiting
-
NCT07353203CompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Exoskeleton
-
NCT07469163RecruitingStroke | Stroke Gait Rehabilitation | Subacute Stroke | Stroke (Subacute)
-
NCT06728020Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07443150CompletedStroke, Ischemic | Subacute Stroke
-
NCT07433972Not yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke Survivors
-
NCT07236216RecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke Patient
-
NCT07338032Completed
-
NCT07332897Enrolling by invitation
-
NCT07537322Not yet recruitingStroke (Subacute)
Clinical Trials on unilateral and bilateral mirror therapy
-
NCT02548234Completed
-
NCT04242316Completed
-
NCT02319785UnknownCerebrovascular Accident
-
NCT02871700Completed
-
NCT03619772CompletedStroke | Coordination Lack | Weakness, Muscle
-
NCT05302102Completed
-
NCT04957745CompletedDiplopia | Binocular Vision Suppression | Binocular; Fusion, With Defective Stereopsis | Monocular Diplopia
-
NCT07289490Not yet recruiting