ETERNALS: Remote Monitoring in Lung Cancer Patients (ETERNALS)

June 27, 2024 updated by: Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Early Detection of Clinical Deterioration Using an Integrated Remote Monitoring System in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Cytotoxic Chemotherapy.

The primary objective of this project is to determine the feasibility of an integrated remote monitoring system in the routine care of lung cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Lung cancer is a highly prevalent malignant tumor with 5.563 new cases in Belgium in 20201. Up to 70% of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis 1. Most of these patients require systemic therapy including cytotoxic chemotherapy as part of their treatment plan. The mortality rate in this patient population remains high due to the aggressive nature of the disease, but also due to treatment related toxicities such as dehydration, infection, and anemia, resulting in emergency department (ED) visits and rehospitalizations. Routine administration of highly effective anti-emetics and the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factors greatly reduced the complication rate in these patients 2, 3. Also, remote symptom monitoring using a web-based tool to which patients can self-report their toxicities (i.e., patient-reported outcomes; PROs) had a marked impact on reducing ED visits and increasing overall survival in the patient-reported outcome (PRO) group 4-6. Despite these successes there is still a large proportion of lung cancer patients for whom weekly self-reports are not feasible. More specific: low socio-economic status, elderly patients and social isolation are associated with low compliance 7, 8. The latter lung cancer patient subgroup is at the highest risk of under-detection when presenting with treatment- or disease-related toxicity. The investigators hypothesize that implementation of an integrated remote monitoring system tracking heart rate, heart rate variability, body temperature, respiration rate, nocturnal oxygen saturation, sleep tracking and daily activity level via an unobtrusive wearable device is more performant and less burdensome compared to other self-reporting methods (e.g., PROs). The primary aim of this project is to set up and implement an integrated remote monitoring system in the routine care of lung cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, in which the remote monitoring is enabled via an unobtrusive wearable device. Via this innovative implementation the investigators believe that patient care can be drastically improved due to the earlier detection of deterioration (i.e., less rehospitalizations and ED visits), especially for those high-risk frail patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Belgium
    • Limburg
      • Genk, Limburg, Belgium, 3600
        • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:-

  • Patient must be in the possession of a phone
  • Diagnosis of Stage IV lung cancer patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy
  • Older than 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life expectancy of less than 6 weeks
  • Not able to understand the Dutch language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: interventional feasibility study arm
Patients will receive a wearable device to monitor vital parameters continuously from the first round of chemo until the last cycle (approx 15 weeks).
Device: Oura Ring
The Oura ring will remotely monitor the patients vitals at home continuously

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time interval
Time Frame: 18 months
Determining the time interval between clinical deterioration detected by the integrated remote monitoring system and the first contact with the care team (i.e., in current clinical practice the patient suffering from chemotherapy-associated symptoms self-reports at the ED)
18 months
Compliance
Time Frame: 18 months
Patient compliance in using the integrated remote monitoring system which will be determined via: number of missed measurements, number of telephonic/physical contact moments related to the technology
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of ED visits
Time Frame: 18 months
Determine the number of ED visits retrospectively, including the disease- and therapy related/induced complications (retrospective sub-study)
18 months
System Usability scale to assess usability and acceptability of the remote monitoring system
Time Frame: 18 months
Acceptability and usability of the integrated remote monitoring system by both the patient and the healthcare specialists. This will be assessed using the following questionnaire: System Usability scale (SUS). The scale varies from 1-5, corresponding with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 strongly agree. Depending on the question, the score can be found either positive/negative.
18 months
mobile Health App Usability Questionnaire to assess usability & acceptability of the remote monitoring system
Time Frame: 18 months
Acceptability and usability of the integrated remote monitoring system by both the Acceptability and usability of the integrated remote monitoring system by both the patient and the healthcare specialists. This will be assessed using the following questionnaire: mobile Health App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). The scale varies from 1-7, with 1 corresponding to 'disagree' and 7 corresponding to 'agree'. Depending on the question, the score can be found either positive/negative.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Maarten Criel, MD, PhD, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 27, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Z2023080 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Hunan Provincial Health Commission)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Oura Ring

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings