Study on Gynecological Laparoscopy Under Total Intravenous Anesthesia

July 23, 2024 updated by: Xiang Wang, Wuhan Children's Hospital

Wuhan Children's Hospital

To investigate the effect of preemptive analgesia with tartaric acid butorphanol on postoperative pain in gynecological laparoscopy under total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil.This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 60 patients undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopy. The patients were divided into two groups: the butorphanol group (n = 30) and the control group (n = 29). Both groups received TIVA with propofol and remifentanil. Observing two groups of patients on the visual analog scale, the total consumption of rescue analogies, and the confidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and the patient satisfaction score.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To investigate the effect of preemptive analgesia with tartaric acid butorphanol on postoperative pain in gynecological laparoscopy under total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil.This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 60 patients undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopy. The patients were divided into two groups: the butorphanol group (n = 30), who received 0.02 mg/kg of tartaric acid butorphanol intravenously 30 minutes prior to anaesthesia induction, and the control group (n = 29), who received the same volume of normal saline. Both groups received TIVA with propofol and remifentanil. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain at rest and on movement at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes were the total consumption of rescue analgesics, the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and the patient satisfaction score.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
59

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Wuhan, China
        • Wuhan Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women patients, aged 18-65 years, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I or II
  • undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopy for benign diseases

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who had an allergy or contraindication to any study drug
  • had chronic pain or opioid use
  • had a history of substance abuse or psychiatric disorders
  • were pregnant or lactating
  • had a severe cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hepatic or haematological disease
  • had a body mass index >30 kg/m2
  • had an inability to understand or cooperate with study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: the butorphanol group
0.02 mg/kg of tartaric acid butorphanol intravenously 30 minutes prior to anaesthesia induction.
Drug: tartaric acid butorphanol
The group received 0.02 mg/kg tartaric acid butorphanol intravenously over 5 minutes, 30 minutes before anaesthesia induction
Drug: propofol and remifentanil
Anaesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg propofol and 0.6 μg/kg remifentanil and maintained with a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil, using the Marsh and Minto models, respectively.
Placebo Comparator: the control group
0.02 mg/kg of normal saline intravenously 30 minutes prior to anaesthesia induction.
Drug: propofol and remifentanil
Anaesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg propofol and 0.6 μg/kg remifentanil and maintained with a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil, using the Marsh and Minto models, respectively.
Drug: normal saline
The group received 0.02 mg/kg normal saline intravenously over 5 minutes, 30 minutes before anaesthesia induction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale ( VAS ) scores for pain
Time Frame: at 1 hour after surgery
Pain was assessed at 1 hour to evaluate immediate postoperative pain while allowing time to recover from anaesthesia.
at 1 hour after surgery
Visual analogue scale ( VAS ) scores for pain
Time Frame: at 2 hours after surgery
Pain was assessed at 2 hours after surgery.
at 2 hours after surgery
Visual analogue scale ( VAS ) scores for pain
Time Frame: at 4 hours after surgery
Pain was assessed at 4 hours after surgery.
at 4 hours after surgery
Visual analogue scale ( VAS ) scores for pain
Time Frame: at 6 hours after surgery
Pain was assessed at 6 hours after surgery.
at 6 hours after surgery
Visual analogue scale ( VAS ) scores for pain
Time Frame: at 12 hours after surgery
Pain was assessed at 12 hours after surgery.
at 12 hours after surgery
Visual analogue scale ( VAS ) scores for pain
Time Frame: at 24 hours after surgery
Pain was assessed at 24 hours after surgery.
at 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the total rescue analgesic consumption (mg)
Time Frame: within 24 hours after surgery
The total rescue analgesic consumption was calculated by adding the amount of morphine delivered by PCA and any supplemental tramadol given by the nurse for inadequate pain control (VAS >4) or at the patient's request, ensuring that the total opioid dose was within safe limits.
within 24 hours after surgery
the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV)
Time Frame: within 24 hours after surgery
The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV) was defined as any nausea, vomiting or both
within 24 hours after surgery
the nausea severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV)
Time Frame: within 24 hours after surgery
The nausea severity was rated on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe)
within 24 hours after surgery
patient satisfaction score
Time Frame: at 24 hours after surgery
Patient satisfaction was assessed using a 5-point scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied and 5 = very satisfied).
at 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wuhan Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WHCH-008

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Butorphanol

Clinical Trials on tartaric acid butorphanol

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings