A Study of Precemtabart Tocentecan With or Without Bevacizumab Compared to Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab in Participants With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PROCEADE-CRC-03)

May 6, 2026 updated by: EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.

A Randomized, Open Label, 3-arm Phase 3 Study of Precemtabart Tocentecan With or Without Bevacizumab Compared to Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab in Participants With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PROCEADE-CRC-03)

This study aims to address the unmet medical need of participants with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have previously been treated with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, a fluoropyrimidine, and bevacizumab, by demonstrating an overall survival prolongation with precemtabart tocentecan (Precem-TcT) as single agent or Precem-TcT in combination with bevacizumab compared to trifluoride/tipiracil (FTD-TPI) plus bevacizumab.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1020

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • New South Wales
      • St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia, 2065
        • Recruiting
        • GenesisCare North Shore (Oncology)
    • Queensland
      • Chermside, Queensland, Australia, 4032
        • Recruiting
        • Icon Cancer Centre Chermside
  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Troy, Michigan, United States, 48098
        • Recruiting
        • Profound Research LLC at Cancer and Leukemia Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with documented histopathological diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer, who were intolerant to, or whose disease was refractory to, or progressed after standard systemic therapies and no more than 2 previous systemic treatment regimens in the metastatic setting.
  • Participants must have received and progressed on no more than 2 previous systemic treatment regimens in the metastatic setting
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than equal to 1
  • Participants must be able to swallow oral tablets, and to comply with the study requirements for all scheduled evaluations
  • Other protocol defined inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If Adverse Events related to previous therapies have not recovered to less than Grade 1 by National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 6.0
  • Participant has a history of additional malignancy within 3 years before randomization
  • Participants with known brain metastases
  • Abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within the past 6 months prior to randomization
  • Participants with ileus of more than Grade 1, or chronic inflammatory bowel disease (example ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease) and/or bowel obstruction, or participants with chronic gastrointestinal disorders that, in the Investigator's opinion, might significantly interfere with proper absorption of the study treatments
  • Other protocol defined exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm 1: Precemtabart tocentecan (Precem-TcT) Monotherapy
Drug: Precemtabart tocentecan
Precem-TcT, administered, once every 3 weeks intravenously, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Other Names:
  • Precem-TcT
Experimental: Arm 2: Precem-TcT plus Bevacizumab
Drug: Precemtabart tocentecan
Precem-TcT, administered, once every 3 weeks intravenously, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Other Names:
  • Precem-TcT
Drug: Bevacizumab
Bevacizumab, administered intravenously every 3 weeks on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle or every 2 weeks on Day 1 and Day 15 of each 28-day cycle.
Active Comparator: Arm 3: Trifluridine/Tipiracil (FTD-TPI) plus Bevacizumab
Drug: Bevacizumab
Bevacizumab, administered intravenously every 3 weeks on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle or every 2 weeks on Day 1 and Day 15 of each 28-day cycle.
Drug: Trifluridine/Tipiracil (FTD-TPI)
FTD-TPI, tablet, administered orally twice daily, on Days 1 to 5 and Days 8 to 12 of each 28-day cycle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Arm 1, 2 and 3: Overall Survival
Time Frame: Time from date of randomization to death, assessed approximately up to average of 19 months
Time from date of randomization to death, assessed approximately up to average of 19 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Arm 1 and Arm 2: Overall Survival
Time Frame: Time from date of randomization to death, assessed approximately up to average of 19 months
Time from date of randomization to death, assessed approximately up to average of 19 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (assessed up to average of 19 months)
Time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (assessed up to average of 19 months)
Objective Response (OR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) as Assessed by Investigator
Time Frame: Up to average of 19 months
Up to average of 19 months
Duration of Response as Assessed by Investigator
Time Frame: Time from first documentation of objective response to PD or death (assessed up to average of 19 months)
Time from first documentation of objective response to PD or death (assessed up to average of 19 months)
Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to average of 19 months
Up to average of 19 months
Observed Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) Period
Time Frame: At end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1 (Arm 1 and Arm 2 only; each cycle is for 21 days)
At end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1 (Arm 1 and Arm 2 only; each cycle is for 21 days)
Concentration Observed at the end of a Dosing Interval Immediately Before next Dosing (Ctrough)
Time Frame: At end of dosing interval on Cycle1Day1,Cycle2Day1,Cycle3Day1,Cycle4Day1, Cycle5Day1,Cycle6Day1,Cycle7Day1 until treatment discontinuation(assessed up to average of 19months (Arm 1 and Arm 2 only; each cycle is for 21 days)
At end of dosing interval on Cycle1Day1,Cycle2Day1,Cycle3Day1,Cycle4Day1, Cycle5Day1,Cycle6Day1,Cycle7Day1 until treatment discontinuation(assessed up to average of 19months (Arm 1 and Arm 2 only; each cycle is for 21 days)
Number of Participants with Anti-Drug Antibody as measured by ADA assay
Time Frame: Predose(-4to0 hours)on Cycle1Day1,Cycle2 Day1,Cycle 3Day1,Cycle4Day1, Cycle8Day1;thereafter every 4cycles until treatment discontinuation(assessed up to average of 19 months) (Arm 1 and Arm 2 only; each cycle is for 21 days)
Predose(-4to0 hours)on Cycle1Day1,Cycle2 Day1,Cycle 3Day1,Cycle4Day1, Cycle8Day1;thereafter every 4cycles until treatment discontinuation(assessed up to average of 19 months) (Arm 1 and Arm 2 only; each cycle is for 21 days)
Change from Baseline in Global Health Status, Physical, and Role Functioning Subscale Scores of European Organization for research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 1 and Day 1 of every new cycle until treatment discontinuation (assessed up to average of 19 months).
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial impact. The EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score ranges from 0 to 100; High score indicates better GHS/QoL. Score 0 represents: very poor physical condition and QoL. Score 100 represents: excellent overall physical condition and QoL.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 1 and Day 1 of every new cycle until treatment discontinuation (assessed up to average of 19 months).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Medical Responsible, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 6, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 16, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 16, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MS914001_0002
  • 2025-524648-37-00 (Ctis)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data. Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within six months after the approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the United States and the European Union

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified scientific and medical researchers can request the data. Such requests must be submitted in writing to the company's portal and will be internally reviewed regarding criteria for researchers' qualification and legitimacy of the research proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Precemtabart tocentecan

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings